Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #403250
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio |
| Date | 2016-12-29 05:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ecjj9oFm2nkU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <dc3956e4-3b20-41e7-bbc6-f7f07183e32b@googlegroups.com> |
Am 29.12.2016 05:25, schrieb David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller: > If Units of Mass is Directly Analogous to units of Time, Then the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio The question is still unsolved: what actually is mass? I compare the features of mass to the stability of a gyroscope. This spinning device is trying to stabilize its own axis of spin. Now matter could be interpreted as 'timelike stable patterns' (of/in spacetime). Since spacetime has a strange feature, which is called 'antisymmetric', the 'points' could build patterns. And the timelike stable ones are, what we call 'matter'. So mass behaves timelike. Timelike means: does not move very much or has low velocity (is inert). The inverse to timelike is spacelike. That means: does not need time to spread over some space. This is the behaviour of static fields. Now a (tiny) static field and around a stable mass is actually an atom. And atoms are the constituents of matter. But atoms are not composed from matter, but are 'patterns', hence are more or less made from nothing. This is why celestial bodies could grow or you could create particle pairs (or dust) from nothing. (In case you are interested, please have a look at my text: https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 ) TH > > Proton compared to Electron = (2/G + c)^2*2e-18 = 1836.1548459 > > (2/G + c)^2*2e-18 = 1832.1183469 > > (1.49833385e+10*2 + 299792458)^2*2e-18 = 1832.1183469 > > solve (30.299792458^2) * 2 = 1836.154845995747363528 > > 2e-18 / (c / 1e+16) = 6.6712819e-11 > > 0.5109989461 * ((30.2997745373^2) * 2) = 938.272081304 > > solve (3^4/2^2 * pi^2 * 299.792458^-1 ) = 0.666659497 > > http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+(3%5E4%2F2%5E2+*+pi%5E2+*+299.792458%5E-1++) > > > If Units of Mass is Directly Analogous to units of Time, Then the The Koide Formula is a Time Ratio Also > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula Well, I would agree, but still prefer to draw things instead of making calculations. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 20:25 -0800
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 20:50 -0800
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-29 05:55 +0100
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 05:53 -0800
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-30 04:41 +0100
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio Sharleen Hagans <nnnsaa@nnnsaa.org> - 2016-12-30 03:51 +0000
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 20:08 -0800
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-01-01 06:14 +0100
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 20:07 -0800
If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 07:27 -0800
If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 12:07 -0800
If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 13:05 -0800
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 13:19 -0800
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 14:16 -0800
Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 19:49 -0800
csiph-web