Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391129

Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS
Date 2016-08-28 20:40 +0200
Message-ID <e2gphqFfk87U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <e0sa3kFsgmhU1@mid.individual.net> <noauc2$1qtd$2@gioia.aioe.org> <e0tbj3F56t0U1@mid.individual.net> <nochbp$1t6l$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e1he0rFu6prU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 16.08.2016 23:13, schrieb Thomas Heger:

> It's been pointed out that, by inventing your own meaning for terms used
> in physics, you are at best using a private language and at worst simply
> making mistakes. This is not how to make a positive contribution.

This is a typical statement based on 'group-think' of people who 
believe, that science is theirs.

People may eventually be smarter than the rest and the groups they build 
could collect a lot of scientific knowledge.

But to have knowledge does not make this knowledge a property, since 
science is about nature and you cannot own nature.

So you have also no authority to decide, what is the proper use of a 
term or in which circumstances its use is allowed.

Here we had the question of 'RoS' or 'relativity of simultaneity'.

I use a different definition, since I base my understanding of 
relativity on other foundations than you do.

I use ideas of Herman Minkowski and regard SRT as wrong.  Since you do 
the exact opposite, we have some kind of 'linguistic problems' and 
disagree about certain fundamental assumptions.

This would not worry me too much, since I do not belong to your 
'in-group' neither and therefore regard as irrelevant, what is the 
proper use of the term 'simultaneity' in your particular circles.


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-16 23:13 +0200
  Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-28 20:40 +0200
    Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-28 11:55 -0700
      Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 05:18 +1000
        Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 17:05 -0700
          Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-29 04:08 +0200
            Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 22:15 -0700
              Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-30 08:38 +0200
                Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 05:43 +1000
                Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-30 22:21 +0200
                Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 06:38 +1000
                Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-31 09:34 +0200
                Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-01 19:43 +1000

csiph-web