Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391149
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS |
| Date | 2016-08-29 04:08 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e2hjocFlekfU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <e1he0rFu6prU1@mid.individual.net> <e2gphqFfk87U1@mid.individual.net> <a3632bfd-6b55-4426-afed-017e0f61630a@googlegroups.com> <npvddq$k5p$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fbaf0134-350d-4ae0-9b96-db2c09a47dc2@googlegroups.com> |
Am 29.08.2016 02:05, schrieb JanPB: >>> >>> the mainstream has invented things like "Dark Energy& Mass" that they Predict will have (NO DETECTABLE PROPERTIES " to balance their EQUATIONS >>> >>> MAGIC .......... >> >> They invented length and time contractions in order to try to make sense >> of the MMX null result and avoid the real and obvious explanation that >> light is essentially ballistic. > > And of course nobody noticed this except you. No, there have been quite a few physicists, who had the believe, that light behaves like ballistic particles. Among them was actually Newton. But this would not help that much, unless you explain, what the term 'particle' stands for. Usually quantum physicists call certain structures 'particle', if they show up long enough to be detected in a bubble chamber or similar device. But what is that particle 'in real'? My own assumption is, that all particles are certain structures within an undivided field, which I call 'spacetime'. So my own theory about matter is called 'structured spacetime'. (https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 ) TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-16 23:13 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-28 20:40 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-28 11:55 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 05:18 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 17:05 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-29 04:08 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 22:15 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-30 08:38 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 05:43 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-30 22:21 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 06:38 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-31 09:34 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-01 19:43 +1000
csiph-web