Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391129
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS |
| Date | 2016-08-28 20:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e2gphqFfk87U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <e0sa3kFsgmhU1@mid.individual.net> <noauc2$1qtd$2@gioia.aioe.org> <e0tbj3F56t0U1@mid.individual.net> <nochbp$1t6l$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e1he0rFu6prU1@mid.individual.net> |
Am 16.08.2016 23:13, schrieb Thomas Heger: > It's been pointed out that, by inventing your own meaning for terms used > in physics, you are at best using a private language and at worst simply > making mistakes. This is not how to make a positive contribution. This is a typical statement based on 'group-think' of people who believe, that science is theirs. People may eventually be smarter than the rest and the groups they build could collect a lot of scientific knowledge. But to have knowledge does not make this knowledge a property, since science is about nature and you cannot own nature. So you have also no authority to decide, what is the proper use of a term or in which circumstances its use is allowed. Here we had the question of 'RoS' or 'relativity of simultaneity'. I use a different definition, since I base my understanding of relativity on other foundations than you do. I use ideas of Herman Minkowski and regard SRT as wrong. Since you do the exact opposite, we have some kind of 'linguistic problems' and disagree about certain fundamental assumptions. This would not worry me too much, since I do not belong to your 'in-group' neither and therefore regard as irrelevant, what is the proper use of the term 'simultaneity' in your particular circles. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-16 23:13 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-28 20:40 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-28 11:55 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 05:18 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 17:05 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-29 04:08 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 22:15 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-30 08:38 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 05:43 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-30 22:21 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 06:38 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-31 09:34 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-01 19:43 +1000
csiph-web