Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391218

Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS

Show all headers | View raw

Am 29.08.2016 07:15, schrieb JanPB:

>>>>> the mainstream has invented things like "Dark Energy&   Mass" that they Predict will have (NO DETECTABLE PROPERTIES " to balance their EQUATIONS
>>>>>
>>>>> MAGIC ..........
>>>>
>>>> They invented length and time contractions in order to try to make sense
>>>> of the MMX null result and avoid the real and obvious explanation that
>>>> light is essentially ballistic.
>>>
>>> And of course nobody noticed this except you.
>>
>> No, there have been quite a few physicists, who had the believe, that
>> light behaves like ballistic particles. Among them was actually Newton.
>
> I meant today.
>

You want to say, there is no recent physicists, who supports light 
particle ideas or 'emission theory of light' ?

This is most likely wrong, too.

As a matter of fact, I do not know, if there are some (or many) 
supporters of similar concepts today. But Google certainly spits out 
something...

like e.g.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

"Experimental verification of ballistic theories of light in Russia and 
the soviet union"

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0030400X14010135

http://worldnpa.org/the-ritz-ballistic-theory-adjusting-the-speed-of-light-to-c-near-the-earth-and-other-celestial-bodies-3/


I personally don't think, that light is carried by particles.


But if light moves with constant velocity, this would indicate the 
existence of a mechanism, which governs the velocity on the way of the 
beam.

This would also need to provide additional energy, to keep the beam at 
constant velocity.

This invisible energy could actually be called 'dark energy'. So I would 
agree with this name for such an assumed mechanism.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-16 23:13 +0200
  Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-28 20:40 +0200
    Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-28 11:55 -0700
      Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 05:18 +1000
        Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 17:05 -0700
          Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-29 04:08 +0200
            Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 22:15 -0700
              Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-30 08:38 +0200
                Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 05:43 +1000
                Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-30 22:21 +0200
                Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 06:38 +1000
                Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-31 09:34 +0200
                Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-01 19:43 +1000

csiph-web