Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > de.sci.electronics > #197099

Re: DIN standards for reading?

Show all headers | View raw

Am 25.11.2015 um 13:48 schrieb w-buechsenschuetz@web.de:
> X-No-archive: Yes
>
> Am Dienstag, 24. November 2015 17:01:12 UTC+1 schrieb Waldemar:
>
>> Another example: DIN912 defines cylindrical bolts with allen key
>> fitting. All of them. Including UNC & UNF i.e. non-metric bolts.
>
> Are you sure that there are DIN standard dimensions for UNC and UNF threads? I do not think so.
>
> There are some threads of non-metric origin which are used and standardized in Germany, too, like the threads used for plumbing tubes. The dimensions, of course, are indicated in mm but the values are rather odd.
>
> The german industry does not support the usage of non-metric threads for standard fasteners. In all catalogues of dealers of nuts and bolts I could find things like "non-metric bolts with UNC threads similar to DIN912" which means that their appearance is similar to the standard of metric bolts.

I'm not sure but some distributors claim to sell DIN912 UNC and UNF 
bolts. For example this one:
http://www.wegertseder.com/index_prod.asp?page=http://www.wegertseder.com/shop/_cartgive/det.asp?numm=2554&cache=42334,4946875

I do not have access to DIN standards.

Waldemar

Back to de.sci.electronics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

DIN standards for reading? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-17 19:59 -0800
  Re: DIN standards for reading? Izur Kockenhan <charly020664@yahoo.de> - 2015-11-18 05:12 +0100
    Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-18 00:20 -0800
  Re: DIN standards for reading? Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2015-11-17 23:41 -0500
    Re: DIN standards for reading? Sebastian Suchanek <sebastian.suchanek@gmx.de> - 2015-11-18 07:00 +0100
      Re: DIN standards for reading? Christian Zietz <newsgroup.1001@chz.xyz> - 2015-11-18 08:27 +0100
  Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-17 23:10 -0800
  Re: DIN standards for reading? legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> - 2015-11-18 15:55 -0500
    Re: DIN standards for reading? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-19 08:38 -0800
      Re: DIN standards for reading? "Ralph Mowery" <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> - 2015-11-19 12:07 -0500
        Re: DIN standards for reading? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-19 09:22 -0800
          Re: DIN standards for reading? "Ralph Mowery" <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> - 2015-11-19 12:53 -0500
        Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-19 09:41 -0800
        Re: DIN standards for reading? Waldemar <waldemar@zedat.fu-berlin.de> - 2015-11-24 17:01 +0100
          Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-25 04:48 -0800
            Re: DIN standards for reading? Waldemar <waldemar@zedat.fu-berlin.de> - 2015-11-26 11:55 +0100
              Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-26 10:18 -0800
                Re: DIN standards for reading? Axel_Berger@b.maus.de (Axel Berger) - 2015-11-27 11:48 +0100
                Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-28 05:45 -0800
      Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-19 09:45 -0800
      Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-19 09:58 -0800

csiph-web