Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > de.sci.electronics > #196359

Re: DIN standards for reading?

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"DaveC" <not@home.cow> wrote in message 
news:0001HW.1BFE327E00023B161112783CF@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Which DIN?
>>
>> RL
>
> No one in particular. Am having a friendly disagreement with a friend 
> about
> what a DIN number means. Does it define things like material, tolerance,
> finish and hardness or does it include size, thread, etc? In other words,
> does the DIN number define a particular, specific fastener (including
> dimension) or only the standards to which that fastener is measured 
> against?
>
> I always related DINs to the US MILSPEC standards which generally are
> standards, not product definitions.
>

DIN defines the size of things.  Say a bolt with  a certain DIN number 
standard will be so many milimeters long, have a certain number of thread 
pitch per mm.

I don't know for sure, but suspect that it does not mean the bolt will be so 
strong or hardened unless aditional informationis added.

Not that familiar with metric standards, but lets use an American bolt as an 
example.  If you want a 1/4-20 bolt then it will be 1/4 inch in diameter and 
have 20 threads per inch.  It may or may not be hardened, made of 
steel,aluminum or any thing else unless specified.

Back to de.sci.electronics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

DIN standards for reading? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-17 19:59 -0800
  Re: DIN standards for reading? Izur Kockenhan <charly020664@yahoo.de> - 2015-11-18 05:12 +0100
    Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-18 00:20 -0800
  Re: DIN standards for reading? Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2015-11-17 23:41 -0500
    Re: DIN standards for reading? Sebastian Suchanek <sebastian.suchanek@gmx.de> - 2015-11-18 07:00 +0100
      Re: DIN standards for reading? Christian Zietz <newsgroup.1001@chz.xyz> - 2015-11-18 08:27 +0100
  Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-17 23:10 -0800
  Re: DIN standards for reading? legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> - 2015-11-18 15:55 -0500
    Re: DIN standards for reading? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-19 08:38 -0800
      Re: DIN standards for reading? "Ralph Mowery" <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> - 2015-11-19 12:07 -0500
        Re: DIN standards for reading? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-19 09:22 -0800
          Re: DIN standards for reading? "Ralph Mowery" <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> - 2015-11-19 12:53 -0500
        Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-19 09:41 -0800
        Re: DIN standards for reading? Waldemar <waldemar@zedat.fu-berlin.de> - 2015-11-24 17:01 +0100
          Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-25 04:48 -0800
            Re: DIN standards for reading? Waldemar <waldemar@zedat.fu-berlin.de> - 2015-11-26 11:55 +0100
              Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-26 10:18 -0800
                Re: DIN standards for reading? Axel_Berger@b.maus.de (Axel Berger) - 2015-11-27 11:48 +0100
                Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-28 05:45 -0800
      Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-19 09:45 -0800
      Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-19 09:58 -0800

csiph-web