Groups > de.sci.electronics > #197199

Re: DIN standards for reading?

From	Axel_Berger@b.maus.de (Axel Berger)
Newsgroups	de.sci.electronics
Message-ID	<201511271148.a46652@b.maus.de> (permalink)
References	<57c1517d-e149-4ff6-bfe7-6f37860ffa27@googlegroups.com>
Organization	MAUS Berlin (+49-30-82701142)
Subject	Re: DIN standards for reading?
Date	2015-11-27 11:48 +0100

Show all headers | View raw

w-buechsenschuetz wrote on Thu, 15-11-26 19:18:
>have severe doubts that there are DIN threads with non-metric dimensions

That's what books of tables are for. I find DIN 13 for metric threads 
(just the treads, there are other standards for the whole bolt 
referring here for the thread), DIN 2999 describing the Whitworth 
thread for tubes (cylindrical inside, cone-shaped outside), DIN 103 for 
trapezoid metric threads (for movement not fastening as in a vice) BUT 
the Whitworth tread for bolts i.e. 3/8" is listed as /not standardized/ 
so there is indeed no DIN for it.
As that was mentioned here before, DIN 898 decribes strength classes 
for bolts and nuts and i.e. DIN 609 and many others the shapes and 
lengths of bolts and their heads.

So yes, there is a DIN for a non-metric thread but only for a special 
case, not for simple nuts and bolts.

Thread

DIN standards for reading? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-17 19:59 -0800
  Re: DIN standards for reading? Izur Kockenhan <charly020664@yahoo.de> - 2015-11-18 05:12 +0100
    Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-18 00:20 -0800
  Re: DIN standards for reading? Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2015-11-17 23:41 -0500
    Re: DIN standards for reading? Sebastian Suchanek <sebastian.suchanek@gmx.de> - 2015-11-18 07:00 +0100
      Re: DIN standards for reading? Christian Zietz <newsgroup.1001@chz.xyz> - 2015-11-18 08:27 +0100
  Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-17 23:10 -0800
  Re: DIN standards for reading? legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> - 2015-11-18 15:55 -0500
    Re: DIN standards for reading? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-19 08:38 -0800
      Re: DIN standards for reading? "Ralph Mowery" <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> - 2015-11-19 12:07 -0500
        Re: DIN standards for reading? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-19 09:22 -0800
          Re: DIN standards for reading? "Ralph Mowery" <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> - 2015-11-19 12:53 -0500
        Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-19 09:41 -0800
        Re: DIN standards for reading? Waldemar <waldemar@zedat.fu-berlin.de> - 2015-11-24 17:01 +0100
          Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-25 04:48 -0800
            Re: DIN standards for reading? Waldemar <waldemar@zedat.fu-berlin.de> - 2015-11-26 11:55 +0100
              Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-26 10:18 -0800
                Re: DIN standards for reading? Axel_Berger@b.maus.de (Axel Berger) - 2015-11-27 11:48 +0100
                Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-28 05:45 -0800
      Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-19 09:45 -0800
      Re: DIN standards for reading? w-buechsenschuetz@web.de - 2015-11-19 09:58 -0800

csiph-web