Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359895
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity |
| Date | 2015-08-07 19:05 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d2janjF5lh4U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <b71bbdbe-2528-4fd2-83dc-2b0d02b243ee@googlegroups.com> <d2ii0uF50dU1@mid.individual.net> <8a3c51c3-ef7e-4535-ab8d-7b7daf0b346a@googlegroups.com> <d2irskF27etU1@mid.individual.net> <076fd822-055f-41d2-b6b5-6f610d6a88d3@googlegroups.com> |
On 7/08/2015 5:08 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote: > On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 9:52:39 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 7/08/2015 2:39 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote: > >>> If they end up 1 meter away at rest, would that constitute as >>> "have united again"? If they end up 10 meters away at rest, >>> would that constitute as "have united again"? Try to understand >>> the physics of the Twin paradox instead of looking for bullshit >>> to justify for the mysticism. <shrug> >> >> They have to end up in the same place - no distance between them >> at all. > > No, they don't have to be as long as the relative speed between them > is null. Why? Think both in the same inertial frames of reference. > <shrug> > >> Though I don't know why you raised that point. > > That is because Koobee Wublee has sensed Sylvia's confusion before > time. <shrug> > >> The argument that there is a paradox is based on the supposed >> symmetry of the scenario. Since a change of inertial frame by just >> one twin breaks the symmetry, there is no paradox. > > This is called hand waving and bullshit. SR is the only place where > one can bullshit its way around ass's end as long as this buffoon > worships Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. <shrug> > You can argue from symmetry, or you can argue from math. You are doing neither. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-07 12:04 +1000
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:39 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-07 14:52 +1000
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 00:08 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-07 19:05 +1000
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 23:42 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 06:27 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2015-08-07 10:02 -0600
Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-06 20:18 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:42 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-07 08:12 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 20:52 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-06 21:14 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-07 00:46 -0400
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 00:20 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Edgardo Alcantara <edgardoalcantara@carosseryrepair.org> - 2015-08-08 10:08 +0000
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-07 08:29 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-07 12:57 -0400
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 00:40 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 07:28 -0500
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 06:31 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Emmerich Schultheiß <emme@noemail.thx> - 2015-08-07 13:46 +0000
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-07 21:35 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 14:22 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 17:33 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 21:29 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-08 16:23 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 21:49 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-09 14:24 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:21 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-10 09:52 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 16:05 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-11 22:23 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 16:01 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-12 21:07 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 21:32 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-13 18:22 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-12 07:38 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:59 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-15 16:35 -0700
csiph-web