Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359865

Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity

Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Date	2015-08-06 17:54 -0700
Message-ID	<b71bbdbe-2528-4fd2-83dc-2b0d02b243ee@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity
From	Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

** The symmetry is established in the Lorentz transform where mutual time dilation becomes possible. <shrug>

** The Twin paradox comes about when the twins A and B starts out at rest. Then, B moves away and finally return to reunite with A at rest. <shrug>

** After some serious brain storming, the consensus is to manually add a law of physics where the Lorentz transform and thus the mutual time dilation is only valid under inertial frames of reference. On the contrary, Special relativity does not even indicate such a manmade law of nature. <shrug>

** A simple resolution can now be hand waved to resolve the paradox by flipping the observed time dilation of the inertial frame. To this day, there remains no sound mathematics to show so. <shrug>

** The religion of relativity is born, and Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar is worshipped as the god. <shrug>

** Koobee Wublee points out that the traveling twin B can be allowed a period where B is moving but with no acceleration. Thus, both twins are in inertial frames, and mutual time dilation must apply with non-null relative speed. Any arbitrary time spent when both twins are in inertial frames with non-null relative speed spells out fatal contradiction to Special Relativity. <shrug>

** So far, any brain storming is fruitless to resolve the paradox. Koobee Wublee urges the relativistic morons to manually create another physical law of nature. That is the Lorentz transform does not apply to any frames that had been non-inertial in the past, and these buffoons can joyfully flip the time dilation equation just like the happy, mystic, good old time. <shrug>

The following indoctrination is the core in the belief of Special Relativity. <shrug>

** FAITH IS LOGIC
** LYING IS TEACHING
** NOISE IS COHERENCY
** DECEIT IS VALIDATION
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** FICTION IS REALITY
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** BULLSHIT IS TRUTH
** ARROGANCE IS SAGE
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** SCRIPTURE IS AXIOM
** CONJECTURE IS THEORY
** HANDWAVING IS REASONING
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE
** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS
** WORSHIPPING IS STUDYING
** CONTRADICTION IS INMATERIAL
** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY
** MYSTIFICATION IS EDUCATION
** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION
** DEMYSTIFICATION IS CONSPIRACY

<shrug>

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 17:54 -0700
  Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-07 12:04 +1000
    Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:39 -0700
      Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-07 14:52 +1000
        Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 00:08 -0700
          Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-07 19:05 +1000
            Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 23:42 -0700
          Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 06:27 -0700
    Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2015-08-07 10:02 -0600
  Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-06 20:18 -0700
    Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:42 -0700
      Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-07 08:12 -0700
  Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 20:52 -0700
    Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-06 21:14 -0700
  Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-07 00:46 -0400
    Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 00:20 -0700
      Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Edgardo Alcantara <edgardoalcantara@carosseryrepair.org> - 2015-08-08 10:08 +0000
    Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-07 08:29 -0700
      Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-07 12:57 -0400
  Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 00:40 -0700
  Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 07:28 -0500
    Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 06:31 -0700
      Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Emmerich Schultheiß <emme@noemail.thx> - 2015-08-07 13:46 +0000
  Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-07 21:35 +0200
    Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 14:22 -0700
      Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 17:33 -0700
        Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 21:29 -0700
      Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-08 16:23 +0200
        Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 21:49 -0700
          Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-09 14:24 +0200
            Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:21 -0700
              Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-10 09:52 +0200
                Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 16:05 -0700
                Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-11 22:23 +0200
                Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 16:01 -0700
                Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-12 21:07 +0200
                Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 21:32 -0700
                Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-13 18:22 +0200
                Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-12 07:38 -0700
        Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:59 -0700
  Re: Twin Paradox  - Engineering of Special Relativity alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-15 16:35 -0700

csiph-web