Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359876
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity |
| Date | 2015-08-07 14:52 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d2irskF27etU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <b71bbdbe-2528-4fd2-83dc-2b0d02b243ee@googlegroups.com> <d2ii0uF50dU1@mid.individual.net> <8a3c51c3-ef7e-4535-ab8d-7b7daf0b346a@googlegroups.com> |
On 7/08/2015 2:39 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote: > On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 7:04:18 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 7/08/2015 10:54 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote: > >>> ** Koobee Wublee points out that the traveling twin B can be >>> allowed a period where B is moving but with no acceleration. >>> Thus, both twins are in inertial frames, and mutual time dilation >>> must apply with non-null relative speed. Any arbitrary time >>> spent when both twins are in inertial frames with non-null >>> relative speed spells out fatal contradiction to Special >>> Relativity. <shrug> >> >> The twins can never meet again unless at least one twin changes >> frame (that is, does not remain in the same inertial frame). > > If they end up 1 meter away at rest, would that constitute as "have > united again"? If they end up 10 meters away at rest, would that > constitute as "have united again"? Try to understand the physics of > the Twin paradox instead of looking for bullshit to justify for the > mysticism. <shrug> > They have to end up in the same place - no distance between them at all. Though I don't know why you raised that point. The argument that there is a paradox is based on the supposed symmetry of the scenario. Since a change of inertial frame by just one twin breaks the symmetry, there is no paradox. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-07 12:04 +1000
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:39 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-07 14:52 +1000
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 00:08 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-07 19:05 +1000
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 23:42 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 06:27 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2015-08-07 10:02 -0600
Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-06 20:18 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:42 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-07 08:12 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 20:52 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-06 21:14 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-07 00:46 -0400
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 00:20 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Edgardo Alcantara <edgardoalcantara@carosseryrepair.org> - 2015-08-08 10:08 +0000
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-07 08:29 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-07 12:57 -0400
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 00:40 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 07:28 -0500
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 06:31 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Emmerich Schultheiß <emme@noemail.thx> - 2015-08-07 13:46 +0000
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-07 21:35 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 14:22 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 17:33 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 21:29 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-08 16:23 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 21:49 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-09 14:24 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:21 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-10 09:52 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 16:05 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-11 22:23 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 16:01 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-12 21:07 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 21:32 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-13 18:22 +0200
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-12 07:38 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:59 -0700
Re: Twin Paradox - Engineering of Special Relativity alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-15 16:35 -0700
csiph-web