Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > uk.net.news.management > #17808

Re: Engineered constitutional crisis

From Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine>
Newsgroups uk.net.news.management, uk.net.news.moderation
Subject Re: Engineered constitutional crisis
Date 2023-01-21 14:11 +0000
Organization Brymor
Message-ID <asfITWM0J$yjFw3D@this.machine> (permalink)
References (15 earlier) <k311g1Fms1bU3@mid.individual.net> <xn0nx3won44fdvs005@news.individual.net> <k31vngFr8vvU1@mid.individual.net> <g$x23tKNd9yjFwQQ@this.machine> <1q4wr2v.1psj2iwo4mbedN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In message <1q4wr2v.1psj2iwo4mbedN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, Sn!pe 
<snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes
>Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote:
>
>> In message <k31vngFr8vvU1@mid.individual.net>, The Todal
>> <the_todal@icloud.com> writes
>> >On 21/01/2023 08:41, Jeff Gaines wrote:
>> >> On 21/01/2023 in message <k311g1Fms1bU3@mid.individual.net> Mike
>> >>Fleming  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> As I asked "are you deemed worthy of being a moderator in
>> >>>>  uk.legal.moderated"
>> >>>
>> >>> What have his very reasonable political views got to do with his
>> >>>ability to be a moderator in uk.legal.moderated?
>> >>  That is a tautology. Moderators in ulm often make highly offensive
>> >>remarks about our properly elected government which indicates their
>> >>views are too extreme for them to have impartial views on other
>> >>matters.  The group seems to exist to pour socialist dogma down
>> >>people's throats  and whine about Brexit.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Is it offensive (for example) to point out that Nadhim Zahawi was under
>> >investigation by the HMRC while he was Chancellor, and that he
>> >aggressively threatened The Independent with legal action if they
>> >published this fact, and that he has now been obliged to pay HMRC a
>> >penalty of more than 1m and possibly as much as 5m?
>> >
>> >It may be disrespectful to the man but does he deserve respect? Is it
>> >"socialist dogma" to print this story?
>> >
>> >The Independent article is here - I think you can register and login free.
>> >
>> >https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nadhim-zahawi-tax-legal-a
>> >ction-b2266128.html
>> >
>> >quote
>> >
>> >In an extraordinary exchange before The Independent broke the story
>> >that he was being investigated last July, Mr Zahawi repeatedly
>> >threatened legal action:
>> >
>> >• When asked about the NCA inquiry, he responded: "One hundred per
>> >cent I will take legal action."
>> >
>> >• When questioned about the HMRC probe, he responded: "I will take
>> >legal action."
>> >
>> >• When pressed for an answer, he responded: "I have responded to
>> >you. I repeat I will take legal action."
>> >
>> >The Independent first reported that Inland Revenue experts were
>> >investigating Mr Zahawi's tax affairs on 6 July after a secret
>> >inquiry by the NCA in 2020.
>>
>> Here we go again, you just don't get it do you
>>
>> What the fuck has this to do with uk.legal.moderated and this group
>>
>> Write what you want to The Gnurdian Mrs Rayner but not here
>>
>
>Can it be that ulm has succumbed to the wider Usenet malaise of a
>thriving newsgroup being effectively killed by politically motivated
>activists swamping the group with off-topic argy-bargy?
>
>I do hope not, I've seen too many once valuable groups go that way.
>One would hope that a moderated group might be able to defend
>itself against such destructive nonsense.
>
>[frownie goes here]
>
Problem is that it is largely the so called moderators who feel free to 
swamp the group with off-topic argy-bargy
-- 
Bryan Morris

Back to uk.net.news.management | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 17:05 +0000
  Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-19 18:25 +0000
    Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 21:36 +0000
      Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 21:53 +0000
        Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 22:04 +0000
          Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-19 22:14 +0000
            Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 01:31 +0000
              Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 01:52 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 02:12 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 02:40 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 19:57 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 02:37 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 08:41 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 09:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:00 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:15 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:02 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:12 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:21 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 16:13 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 17:53 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 18:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:23 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 22:50 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:23 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 21:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:44 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:26 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 15:47 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 11:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:48 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Algernon Goss-Custard <Ben@nowhere.com> - 2023-01-21 15:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 15:51 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:28 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:49 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:20 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:27 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 20:01 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:28 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-22 09:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:01 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 21:08 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-22 08:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 01:20 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:04 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-23 13:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:34 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roland Perry <roland@perry.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 06:37 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 08:55 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:35 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 17:09 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-29 19:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-30 00:52 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-30 01:21 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis JNugent <jenningsandco@mail.com> - 2023-01-21 17:18 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:13 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 12:15 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 12:47 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:11 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:18 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 16:00 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:59 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 13:06 +0000

csiph-web