Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > uk.net.news.management > #17789

Re: Engineered constitutional crisis

Show all headers | View raw

In message <slrntsjsvi.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens 
<jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes
>On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote:
>> In message <slrntsjg5i.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens
>><jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes
>>>On 2023-01-19, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote:
>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 21:53:15 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote:
>>>>> In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter
>>>>> <roger@hayter.org> writes
>>>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, 
>>>>>>>>Jon Ribbens
>>>>>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes
>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>Conservative
>>>>>>>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn
>>>>>>>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The row appears contrived.  Whilst Scottish law has always / long
>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage),
>>>>>>>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept
>>>>>>>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic
>>>>>>>>>>>>decision of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the Scottish government.  The result a court case and a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>political row
>>>>>>>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by 
>>>>>>>>>>>the Tories,
>>>>>>>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> not "unable to accept" it,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish
>>>>>>>>>> law either.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred
>>>>>>>>>> towards them,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but 
>>>>>>>>>the current
>>>>>>>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're
>>>>>>>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any
>>>>>>>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action 
>>>>>>>>>the Tory
>>>>>>>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run
>>>>>>>>> by any other party.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in
>>>>>>>> uk.legal.moderated
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a totally
>>>>>> inappropriate newsgroup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting inappropriate
>>>>> personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator?
>>>>
>>>> A personal comment would normally have to be about a specific person.
>>>
>>>Perhaps "Bryan Morris" is secretly Keir Starmer in disguise.
>> Oh you're a Corbynista too?
>
>So you didn't even read the message that prompted your immoderate
>outburst. Why am I not surprised?

Yes I know you think Starmer is a shithead. No doubt you share Corbyn's 
views on matters that keep him outside the Labour whip
-- 
Bryan Morris

Back to uk.net.news.management | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 17:05 +0000
  Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-19 18:25 +0000
    Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 21:36 +0000
      Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 21:53 +0000
        Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 22:04 +0000
          Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-19 22:14 +0000
            Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 01:31 +0000
              Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 01:52 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 02:12 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 02:40 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 19:57 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 02:37 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 08:41 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 09:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:00 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:15 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:02 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:12 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:21 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 16:13 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 17:53 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 18:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:23 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 22:50 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:23 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 21:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:44 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:26 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 15:47 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 11:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:48 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Algernon Goss-Custard <Ben@nowhere.com> - 2023-01-21 15:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 15:51 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:28 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:49 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:20 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:27 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 20:01 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:28 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-22 09:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:01 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 21:08 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-22 08:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 01:20 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:04 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-23 13:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:34 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roland Perry <roland@perry.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 06:37 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 08:55 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:35 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 17:09 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-29 19:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-30 00:52 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-30 01:21 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis JNugent <jenningsandco@mail.com> - 2023-01-21 17:18 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:13 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 12:15 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 12:47 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:11 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:18 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 16:00 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:59 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 13:06 +0000

csiph-web