Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > uk.net.news.management > #17792

Re: Engineered constitutional crisis

From Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk>
Newsgroups uk.net.news.management, uk.net.news.moderation
Subject Re: Engineered constitutional crisis
Date 2023-01-21 02:37 +0000
Message-ID <k311g1Fms1bU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <XsNLzqL+7eyjFwmW@this.machine> <slrntsjsvi.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu> <WsWLDIOSifyjFwWU@this.machine> <slrntsjvo7.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu> <fePpfGE2IvyjFwUl@this.machine>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 20/01/2023 19:57, Bryan Morris wrote:
> In message <slrntsjvo7.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens 
> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes
>> On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote:
>>> In message <slrntsjsvi.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens
>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes
>>>> On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote:
>>>>> In message <slrntsjg5i.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon 
>>>>> Ribbens
>>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes
>>>>>> On 2023-01-19, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 21:53:15 GMT, "Bryan Morris" 
>>>>>>> <nospam@this.machine> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter
>>>>>>>> <roger@hayter.org> writes
>>>>>>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>,
>>>>>>>>>>> Jon Ribbens
>>>>>>>>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conservative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The row appears contrived.  Whilst Scottish law has 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always / long
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Scottish government.  The result a court case and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> political row
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Tories,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not "unable to accept" it,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Scottish
>>>>>>>>>>>>> law either.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then 
>>>>>>>>>>>> sure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hatred
>>>>>>>>>>>>> towards them,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but
>>>>>>>>>>>> the current
>>>>>>>>>>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking
>>>>>>>>>>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was 
>>>>>>>>>>>> run by any
>>>>>>>>>>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action
>>>>>>>>>>>> the Tory
>>>>>>>>>>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> *not* run
>>>>>>>>>>>> by any other party.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in
>>>>>>>>>>> uk.legal.moderated
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a 
>>>>>>>>> totally
>>>>>>>>> inappropriate newsgroup.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting 
>>>>>>>> inappropriate
>>>>>>>> personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A personal comment would normally have to be about a specific 
>>>>>>> person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps "Bryan Morris" is secretly Keir Starmer in disguise.
>>>>> Oh you're a Corbynista too?
>>>>
>>>> So you didn't even read the message that prompted your immoderate
>>>> outburst. Why am I not surprised?
>>>
>>> Yes I know you think Starmer is a shithead. No doubt you share Corbyn's
>>> views on matters that keep him outside the Labour whip
>>
>> I'm sorry to report that you are even worse at reading minds
>> than you are at reading words.
> 
> I read OK, is English not your first language?
> 
> As I asked "are you deemed worthy of being a moderator in
>   uk.legal.moderated"

What have his very reasonable political views got to do with his ability 
to be a moderator in uk.legal.moderated?

Back to uk.net.news.management | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 17:05 +0000
  Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-19 18:25 +0000
    Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 21:36 +0000
      Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 21:53 +0000
        Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 22:04 +0000
          Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-19 22:14 +0000
            Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 01:31 +0000
              Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 01:52 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 02:12 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 02:40 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 19:57 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 02:37 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 08:41 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 09:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:00 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:15 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:02 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:12 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:21 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 16:13 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 17:53 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 18:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:23 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 22:50 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:23 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 21:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:44 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:26 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 15:47 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 11:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:48 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Algernon Goss-Custard <Ben@nowhere.com> - 2023-01-21 15:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 15:51 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:28 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:49 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:20 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:27 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 20:01 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:28 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-22 09:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:01 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 21:08 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-22 08:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 01:20 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:04 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-23 13:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:34 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roland Perry <roland@perry.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 06:37 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 08:55 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:35 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 17:09 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-29 19:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-30 00:52 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-30 01:21 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis JNugent <jenningsandco@mail.com> - 2023-01-21 17:18 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:13 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 12:15 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 12:47 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:11 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:18 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 16:00 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:59 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 13:06 +0000

csiph-web