Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #372992

Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window"

From "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window"
Date 2016-09-27 18:09 +0000
Organization O.W.L.
Message-ID <ahjdgje9aa.ji@perch.invalid> (permalink)
References <D40FE0C3.7E97E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Curious why you denied you were the one talking about the script's window in
> the following exchange:
> 
>   Owl: 
>     ----- 
>     For example, Script1 inadvertently sends something to Script2's
>     window: ... 
>     ------ 
>     
>   Snit: 
>     ----- 
>     The scripts windows are not even the ones being discussed! It is
>     the terminal windows which are having things done with them!
>     This is a concept you keep getting wrong over and over and over.
>     ----- 
>     
>   Owl: 
>     ----- 
>     What the FUCK are you babbling about NOW?  I am NOT talking
>     about the script's window you MORON.
>     ----- 
>     
> Not how you asked me about the script's windows but then denied you were
> talking about the scripts windows AS you call me names (you could not help
> yourself from trolling). So I noted what you were claiming:
> 
>   Snit: 
>     ----- 
>     Ah, so when you said: "Script1 inadvertently sends something to
>     Script2's window" you did not mean Script2's window.
>     ----- 
>     
> And instead of actually noting how much you screwed up, you tried to turn
> things around: 
> 
>   Owl: 
>     ----- 
>     What did you mean by "the scripts windows"?
>     ----- 
>     
> Even though you were trolling and working to turn things around after your
> complete and utter screw up, I answered in great detail (and I quote it
> below). But you have yet to answer a very simple question. When you said:
> 
>   Owl: 
>     ----- 
>     For example, Script1 inadvertently sends something to Script2's
>     window: ... 
>     ------ 
> 
> What "script's window" did you mean?
> 
> And, as promised, the rather detailed answer to your question (even as you
> troll me I am happy to help you learn... after all, that focused on
> technology and not insults, and THAT is what I am here for -- though bullet
> two is a response to your trolling):
> 
> * The ONLY windows being controlled by these scripts are the ones from
> the terminal. In these cases the windows can be referenced by ID,
> index, and more but in NO case are they in a situation where another
> script cannot control them at ANY time, even in the middle of one
> script running. 
> 
> * I am the one who taught you this (and even after you were told you kept
> asking) and then you trolled and pretended I did not know this or did not
> understand the implication of referencing windows by ID or index!
> 
> * Scripts can run in windows but they need not. Even if they do,
> though, they are not the ones being controlled, nor do they in any way
> "own" any of the windows which are being controlled by the scripts. Again,
> ANY script can send messages to ANY window... by index, ID, or more.
> 
> * The script editors' windows (the one the scripts are in) are NOT being
> controlled by the scripts we have been looking at. They COULD be, but they
> are not. These windows (the scripts' windows) are completely irrelevant to
> the conversation EXCEPT when you keep talking about them and use the term
> "script's windows" to maybe (mean) the terminal's windows because that is
> how lost you are! 
> 
> * When I respond to you speaking of the "script's windows" and note you are
> lost, I mean whichever windows you are talking about: either the windows of
> the script editor, which is not relevant, or the windows the scripts are
> referencing which are NOT the script's windows but you are too lost to
> understand that! 
> 

you got pwned.  deal.
 
 

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 08:39 -0700
  Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 18:25 +0200
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:18 -0700
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:05 +0200
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:34 -0700
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:13 +0000
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:22 -0700
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:29 +0200
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
              Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:55 -0700
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:33 +0000
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:53 -0700
              Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 20:01 +0000
                Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 13:18 -0700
                Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 21:49 +0000
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:54 +0000
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
  Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:09 +0000
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:58 +0000
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:39 -0700

csiph-web