Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373033

Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window"

From "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window"
Date 2016-09-27 20:01 +0000
Organization O.W.L.
Message-ID <ahfadgji3033.34@perch.invalid> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <D40FF80C.7E9AB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ahjdguer003.g@perch.invalid> <D41006FF.7E9C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <hjgdavuc793.gji@perch.invalid> <D4100E21.7E9DE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 9/27/16, 11:33 AM, in article hjgdavuc793.gji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article ahjdguer003.g@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>> 
>>>>> The fact he was ignorant is not a shame for him at all... but the fact he
>>>>> trolled me over it is. That is why he is running... and why I find it so
>>>>> amusing to keep posting the same post in an effort to get him to reply.
>>>>> 
>>>>> He never will, though... he, like you, is ashamed of his ignorance.
>>>> 
>>>> Oh yeah.  I am so ashamed for pwning you.
>>> 
>>> See: you screwed up, got ashamed, and are STILL trolling.
>>> 
>> 
>> Tard, your boneheaded script wrote to whatever window had focus and
>> you argued that that was a good design.
> 
> Please quote the argument you mean.
> 

So now you don't think your script was a good design?  I agree.


>> Moron.  Stay away from computers.
> 
> You also never showed a single instance where the script would fail...

Sure I did.  I demonstrated your hair-brained method of writing to
the top window in a video, showing how commands from different scripts
get intermixed. 

> but
> then whined a whole lot. With that said, when you asked if it could run into
> trouble if another script was running at the same time I noted it could...
> as could a script which referenced those same windows by ID and not index!
> 

No they would not.  A script targeting a window by windowid is not going
to write to the wrong window.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 08:39 -0700
  Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 18:25 +0200
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:18 -0700
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:05 +0200
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:34 -0700
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:13 +0000
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:22 -0700
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:29 +0200
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
              Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:55 -0700
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:33 +0000
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:53 -0700
              Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 20:01 +0000
                Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 13:18 -0700
                Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 21:49 +0000
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:54 +0000
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
  Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:09 +0000
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:58 +0000
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:39 -0700

csiph-web