Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373051

Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window"

Show all headers | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 9/27/16, 1:01 PM, in article ahfadgji3033.34@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/27/16, 11:33 AM, in article hjgdavuc793.gji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article ahjdguer003.g@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>>>> The fact he was ignorant is not a shame for him at all... but the fact he
>>>>>>> trolled me over it is. That is why he is running... and why I find it so
>>>>>>> amusing to keep posting the same post in an effort to get him to reply.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> He never will, though... he, like you, is ashamed of his ignorance.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Oh yeah.  I am so ashamed for pwning you.
>>>>> 
>>>>> See: you screwed up, got ashamed, and are STILL trolling.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Tard, your boneheaded script wrote to whatever window had focus and
>>>> you argued that that was a good design.
>>> 
>>> Please quote the argument you mean.
>> 
>> So now you don't think your script was a good design?  I agree.
> 
> Please quote the argument you mean.
> 
> Do not run off. Do not ask other questions. Do not dodge or move goal posts
> or otherwise wiggle out of your claim.
> 
> Please quote the argument you mean.
> 

I'm not digging back through last week's posts.  If you now agree that
your script design was crap, then fine.  On the other hand if you still
cling to the idea that it was a good design, then there's no need to
dig back.  I point you here.


>>>> Moron.  Stay away from computers.
>>> 
>>> You also never showed a single instance where the script would fail...
>> 
>> Sure I did. 
> 
> Ah, then I missed it. My apologies. Link?
> 

You didn't miss it.  You commented on it.

https://vid.me/nR1G

I suppose I should clarify about how your script "failed".  It failed
as a design.  It did not fail to execute a broken design.  It succeeded
masterfully at that.
  


>> I demonstrated your hair-brained method of writing to the top window in a
>> video, showing how commands from different scripts get intermixed.
> 
> By all means please do re-post the link. I missed it and apologize.
> 
>>> but then whined a whole lot. With that said, when you asked if it could run
>>> into trouble if another script was running at the same time I noted it
>>> could... as could a script which referenced those same windows by ID and not
>>> index!
>> 
>> No they would not.
> 
> LOL! Keep in mind I have shown you videos proving what I told you.
> 

Nope.
(Nice splitting to remove context, though).

> And below you show you STILL do not get it:

I don't get what?  That you implemented a broken design?  Of course
I get that.

> a script targeting the TOP
> window will send the messages to the TOP window.

Do tell.

> A script targeting a window
> with ID 1234 will send the messages to the window with ID 1234.
> 

More nuggets of arcana.


> Whether they are the right or wrong window depends on what you, the
> programmer, WANT. The script does not know what it is "supposed" to do in
> any way other than doing what it is told!
> 

Yes, if you tell it to do retarded things, that's what it will do.


>> A script targeting a window by windowid is not going to write to the wrong
>> window.
> 
 

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 08:39 -0700
  Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 18:25 +0200
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:18 -0700
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:05 +0200
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:34 -0700
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:13 +0000
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:22 -0700
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:29 +0200
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
              Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:55 -0700
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:33 +0000
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:53 -0700
              Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 20:01 +0000
                Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 13:18 -0700
                Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 21:49 +0000
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:54 +0000
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
  Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:09 +0000
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:58 +0000
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:39 -0700

csiph-web