Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #372967
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" |
| Date | 2016-09-27 08:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D40FE0C3.7E97E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
Curious why you denied you were the one talking about the script's window in
the following exchange:
Owl:
-----
For example, Script1 inadvertently sends something to Script2's
window: ...
------
Snit:
-----
The scripts windows are not even the ones being discussed! It is
the terminal windows which are having things done with them!
This is a concept you keep getting wrong over and over and over.
-----
Owl:
-----
What the FUCK are you babbling about NOW? I am NOT talking
about the script's window you MORON.
-----
Not how you asked me about the script's windows but then denied you were
talking about the scripts windows AS you call me names (you could not help
yourself from trolling). So I noted what you were claiming:
Snit:
-----
Ah, so when you said: "Script1 inadvertently sends something to
Script2's window" you did not mean Script2's window.
-----
And instead of actually noting how much you screwed up, you tried to turn
things around:
Owl:
-----
What did you mean by "the scripts windows"?
-----
Even though you were trolling and working to turn things around after your
complete and utter screw up, I answered in great detail (and I quote it
below). But you have yet to answer a very simple question. When you said:
Owl:
-----
For example, Script1 inadvertently sends something to Script2's
window: ...
------
What "script's window" did you mean?
And, as promised, the rather detailed answer to your question (even as you
troll me I am happy to help you learn... after all, that focused on
technology and not insults, and THAT is what I am here for -- though bullet
two is a response to your trolling):
* The ONLY windows being controlled by these scripts are the ones from
the terminal. In these cases the windows can be referenced by ID,
index, and more but in NO case are they in a situation where another
script cannot control them at ANY time, even in the middle of one
script running.
* I am the one who taught you this (and even after you were told you kept
asking) and then you trolled and pretended I did not know this or did not
understand the implication of referencing windows by ID or index!
* Scripts can run in windows but they need not. Even if they do,
though, they are not the ones being controlled, nor do they in any way
"own" any of the windows which are being controlled by the scripts. Again,
ANY script can send messages to ANY window... by index, ID, or more.
* The script editors' windows (the one the scripts are in) are NOT being
controlled by the scripts we have been looking at. They COULD be, but they
are not. These windows (the scripts' windows) are completely irrelevant to
the conversation EXCEPT when you keep talking about them and use the term
"script's windows" to maybe (mean) the terminal's windows because that is
how lost you are!
* When I respond to you speaking of the "script's windows" and note you are
lost, I mean whichever windows you are talking about: either the windows of
the script editor, which is not relevant, or the windows the scripts are
referencing which are NOT the script's windows but you are too lost to
understand that!
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 08:39 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 18:25 +0200
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:18 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:05 +0200
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:34 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:13 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:22 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:29 +0200
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:55 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:33 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:53 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 20:01 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 13:18 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 21:49 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:54 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:09 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:58 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:39 -0700
csiph-web