Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast

From	"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Newsgroups	alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast
Date	2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
Organization	Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Message-ID	<MPG.311f67dc5b3284df98c57d@news.altopia.com> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <n919ml$ps1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <063a1950683b63eec1b5ccd593fd83a9@dizum.com> <n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <a56f36549e06183d9cbf20e4f756bc5d@dizum.com> <ijdbbbpihfm5jlt3evgogmfdl40p4qj7pn@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <ijdbbbpihfm5jlt3evgogmfdl40p4qj7pn@4ax.com>, 
skeet@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Sat,  6 Feb 2016 07:38:10 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> >Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >
> >Ko0Ooki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
> ><news:n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
> >the wood chipper again:
> >
> >Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
> >========================================================
> >========================================================
> >> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  
> >
> >Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
> >coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
> >apparently.
> >
> >And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
> >on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
> >
> >Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
> >anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
> >it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
> >between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
> >f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
> >getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
> >mouth!
> >
> >Oh, here's Kensi:
> ><http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
> >
> >She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
> >I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
> >
> >Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
> >thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
> >
> ><https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
> >
> >You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
> >say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
> >"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
> >kinky. LOL
> >
> >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
> >
> >> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> >> any good telescopes lately?
> >
> >Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
> >capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
> >
> ><snicker>
> >========================================================
> >========================================================
> >
> >I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
> >time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
> >work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
> >which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
> >lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
> >because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
> >assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
> >jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
> >dude.
> >
> ><snicker>
> >
> >> On 05/02/2016 1:30 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> >> Emeritus wrote:
> >
> >>>> http://littleshop.physics.colostate.edu/activities/atmos1/ColderOnClearThanCloudy.pdf
> >
> >>> Bwahahahaaa! A high school
> >
> >> Colorado State University physics department. Are you illiterate or 
> >> something?
> >
> >Yeah, it's still a high school level experiment. If what they're
> >teaching in "college level" physics classes in Colorado is pointing a
> >temperature gun at a pane of glass and conflating the glass to a
> >cloud, they must all be high. LOL
> >
> >>> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14
> >>> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared
> >>> atmospheric window
> >
> >> So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok.
> >
> >Lunkhead is now attempting to state that the ~11-micron infrared
> >atmospheric window extends from 5.5 to 14 micron. LOL!
> >
> >Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared
> >range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6
> >micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at
> >~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow
> >window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which
> >constitutes the infrared atmospheric window.
> >
> >Water and ice emit at ~11 micron. Right in the center of the
> >atmospheric infrared window, thus that energy is radiated straight out
> >to space unimpeded, without heating the atmosphere, even if clouds are
> >present. Moron. LOL
> >
> >So the infrared thermometer used in that high school-level experiment
> >would have been picking up reflected IR from ~5.5 to ~8 microns and
> >from ~12.5 to ~14 microns, which is outside the infrared atmospheric
> >window and thus reflecting the heat of the infrared laser diode, thus
> >skewing the results.
> >
> >But then, high school-level experiments are the best LunkHead can
> >do... meanwhile, those peer reviewed studies remain unrefuted, the
> >NASA SABER study remains undisputed, and LunkHead remains *wrong*. LOL
> >
> >--------------------------
> >
> >Kensi The K0ok doesn't want anyone to realize that he was yet again
> >180 degrees out from reality. To wit, LunkHead k'lamed global warming
> >causes stronger hurricanes, but in reality:
> >
> >"The total and UV solar radiation -  A hurricane's maximum potential
> >energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
> >convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
> >An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
> >through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
> >response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
> >_decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
> >leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
> >
> >To wit, LunkHead k'lamed that CO2 causes global warming:
> >
> ><http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
> >=================================================================
> >"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
> >James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
> >"When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
> >molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
> >
> >For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
> >absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
> >the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
> >of that total back into space.
> >
> >{NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
> >wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
> >=================================================================
> >
> >To wit, LunkHead k'lames the planet is warming, in spite of the proof
> >from NASA, UAH, UK Met, RSS, NSIDC, SIDC SILSO and other research
> >facilities proving it's cooling:
> >
> >=================================================================
> ><http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
> >The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
> >*decrease*.
> >
> >Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
> >The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
> >*decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
> >
> ><http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
> ><https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
> >Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
> >orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
> >cooling has set in... since 1998.
> >
> ><http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
> >Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
> >
> >Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
> >*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
> >years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
> ><http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
> >
> >Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
> >Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
> >years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
> >archived it):
> ><http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
> >Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
> >temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
> >
> >"There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
> >is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
> >
> ><http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
> >"We have been building models and there are now robust
> >contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
> >Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
> >physical model says it has to be warming."
> >
> >===============================================================
> >Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
> ><http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
> >
> >"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
> >warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
> >relations problem for us."  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
> >scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
> >out of the bag.
> >
> >You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
> >ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
> >===============================================================
> >
> >You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
> >can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*, 
> >you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
> >window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
> >your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
> >do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
> >your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
> >and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
> >
> >SPNAK!
> >
> >>>> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered.
> >
> >>> Look at LunkHead dancing furiously in trying to cover up the fact that
> >>> he was *wrong* in his contention that global warming caused stronger
> >>> hurricanes. LOL
> >>> 
> >>> "The total and UV solar radiation -  A hurricane's maximum potential
> >>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
> >>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
> >>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
> >>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
> >>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
> >>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
> >>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
> >>> 
> >>> Three peer reviewed studies, combined with the NASA SABER study, prove
> >>> you *wrong* on every single contention you've made, LunkHead... and
> >>> coincidentally, it proves the entire underlying premise of the Klimate
> >>> Katastrophe Kook AGW crowd is a fucking lie that only uneducated
> >>> halfwits believe in. LOL
> >
> >> *noisy crickets*
> >
> >Spankard. Backpedal faster, you're losing. LOL
> >
> >>>> ... 4*pi. For the regular, Platonic solid tetrahedron with
> >>>> equilaterial-triangle faces, in Euclidean space, it's 6*cos^-1(1/3) -
> >>>> 4*pi, and will exceed this in positively-curved space and be deficient
> >>>> of it in negatively-curved space.)
> >
> >>> Nicely cut-n-pasted from what I'm sure was another of your all-day
> >>> Google-raping sessions, LunkHead.
> >
> >And now let's watch the kooktard who's been proven to be *wrong*,
> >who's had his stupid face rubbed in the reality that the planet is
> >*cooling*, that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas, that he's a gullible
> >goof who bought into the lie of AGW because he's a gullible goof who
> >bought into the lie of liberalism... let's watch that spankard
> >fucktard spew unrelated froth as means of propping up a weak little
> >straw man so he can declare some form of 'victolly' before he runs
> >away with his tail tucked. LOL
> >
> ><Turns On LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
> >---------------------------------
> >> Then you won't mind backing up that accusation with proof. Say, a link 
> >> to where I allegedly plagiarized that from. C'mon -- if I really did 
> >> plagiarize it from something I found with a Google search, you really 
> >> shouldn't have any trouble finding the original. Just paste a phrase 
> >> from what I wrote into google and try to find something (other than 
> >> Google Groups's archive of my post, of course) that I copied it from. Go 
> >> on, and then post the link here. Your failure to do so will be taken as 
> >> your tacit admission that your accusation was a load of bullshit without 
> >> any truth to it whatsoever.
> >> 
> >> Meanwhile, I will use the formula to derive the result for the 
> >> triangular chunk of a sphere surface from ninety-degree segments of 
> >> three great circles:
> >
> >IOW, you're a lune-loon. LOL
> >
> >> First, note that such a triangle covers 1/8 of the sphere's surface, as 
> >> one can, using three mutually perpendicular planes intersecting the 
> >> sphere,
> >
> >So you've created 4 lunes as a part of the spherical surface bounded
> >by two great circles at their axial antipodal intersections, then
> >introduced another great circle to create triangles from the lunes.
> >Nothing very difficult yet, LunkHead. They teach this in introductory
> >geometry, right? Or did the college you attended teach you such
> >"advanced theory" as aiming a temperature gun at a pane of glass, and
> >conflating glass with clouds? LOL
> >
> >> divide it into eight such curved triangular surfaces.
> >
> >You're not breaking any new ground here, LunkHead.
> >
> >> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area
> >
> >You mean its surface area. Sloppiness begets sloppiness. LOL
> >
> >> is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi
> >
> >Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
> >Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
> >backpedal, LunkHead. LOL
> >
> >You mean the Gaussian curve = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi),
> >and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r
> >due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's
> >Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL
> >
> >You mean 1 / area^2? Did LunkHead just fuck up his simple geometry?
> >LOL
> >
> >Of course, in the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, the non-Euclidean
> >space would have positive *and* negative Gaussian curvature, and
> >therefore you'd be working with a Gaussian curvature described by -1 /
> >area^2 *and* 1 / area^2, right? After all, doesn't a 4-D Minkowski
> >space-time manifold essentially project and transform the (usually
> >roughly) spherical (elliptical geometry) objects within it to a plane
> >geometry with hyperbolic mass "points" at the intersections of the
> >principal curvatures and tangential plane to produce homeomorphic
> >isometries? Sure it does. Isn't that what Lobachevsky discovered? Sure
> >it is. I mean, isn't that how gravity essentially works, via the
> >metric curvature tensor isometric differential in the tensor field
> >between the curvature of a Riemannian manifold and Euclidean space, as
> >described by the geodesic deviation equation? Sure it is.
> >
> >But don't go there, that way lies you outing yourself as an
> >introductory college course-level geometry goof.
> >
> ><snicker>
> >
> >> divided by its surface area.
> >
> >Wow, LunkHead "knows" that a sphere of radius r has Gaussian curvature
> >of 1/r^2. Carl Friedrich Gauss, LunkHead ain't. That's what happens
> >when you try to rape Wikipedia, you poseur. LOL
> >
> >Of course, LunkHead is deliberately sticking with simple geometric
> >shapes, while conveniently neglecting to mention that a 4-D Minkowski
> >space-time manifold in the presence of an orbiting mass will be more
> >akin to a complex saddle surface with pseudospherical hyperbolic
> >surface geometry, and that'd require differential trigonometry of the
> >eigenvalues of the shape operator to figure out the principal
> >curvatures, and LunkHead doesn't dare stray into that territory. LOL
> >
> >He's fine (FSVO "fine", given that he's already fucked up his simple
> >Gaussian curvature equation above. LOL) as long as he sticks to
> >describing a simple triangle or sphere wrapped on a non-Euclidean
> >positive-Gaussian-curvature space, which he can describe via the more
> >general (and easier) Gauss-Bonnet theorem, but complex shapes which
> >require surface integrals of the Gaussian curvature to derive the
> >total curvature and thus the deviation of the sums of a triangle's
> >angles from 180 degrees would expose him as a Google-raping fraud with
> >an introductory geometry college class or two under his belt, and as a
> >lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy kook merely playing at being an
> >astrophysicist.
> >
> ><snicker>
> >
> >> If the triangle's area is 
> >> x times the sphere's surface area, then the area times the curvature is 
> >> x*A*4*pi/A = 4*pi*x. For x = 1/8 that gives pi/2. Previously established 
> >> was that for a triangle in a curved manifold angle_sum - pi = 
> >> curvature_integral, which for a surface of constant curvature is just 
> >> area * curvature, so angle_sum - pi = pi/2 in our example. So, angle_sum 
> >> = 3*pi/2, or 270 degrees.
> >> 
> >> What's interesting here is that this angle sum applies to *any* 
> >> triangular chunk of the surface of a sphere whose area is 1/8 of the 
> >> whole sphere. It could be a weird long and narrow triangle with that 
> >> area and the angle sum will still be 270. Just eyeballing a sphere can 
> >> tell you that the special case of three of the vertices of an inscribed 
> >> octahedron (not including any two antipodal ones) will give you a 
> >> triangle with than angle sum, but not that *any* triangle of the same 
> >> area will do likewise.
> >> 
> >> Now, you go ahead and try to find somewhere I might have plagiarized 
> >> *that* from as well. And fail. But you are obsessed with proving me to 
> >> be some sort of fraud, so you will spend a long time fruitlessly 
> >> spinning your wheels trying before you give up, and that shall be my 
> >> next victory over you. That, and knowing all sorts of math that you 
> >> don't, and never will, because you're too ... lunkheaded.
> >---------------------------------
> ><Turns Off LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
> >
> >Whew! That was quite the butthurt bleating, LunkHead. I've got you
> >desperately raping Google *and* spewing hard about a completely
> >unrelated topic, all while my steel-toed boot continues to rapid-fire
> >kick your stoooopid kook ass on the topic that matters... that of
> >anthropogenic global warming being proven to be a scam by none other
> >than NASA, that of your continuing to deny the well-known and
> >thoroughly-studied existence of the 11-micron infrared atmospheric
> >window, and that of your continuing to deny that CO2 is a global
> >*coolant* _because_ of that 11-micron infrared atmospheric window, as
> >the NASA SABER study and the other referenced peer-reviewed studies
> >proved.
> >
> >SPNAK!
> >
> >> *sn<SMACKAKOOK!>
> >
> >You're not worthy of the <snicker>, LunkHead. The <snicker> is
> >reserved for those intelligent enough that they don't have to rape
> >Google and plagiarize / modify website information to try to "prove"
> >they're not a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroom-goober.
> >
> ><snicker>
> 
> 
> 
> Damn!   Fakey proves himself yet again, a foam frother from the start.

That was quite the screed.  He's obviously majorly butthurt over Kensi 
kicking his stupid ass to the curb, and being more intelligent than him.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, and new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved

Thread

Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:19 -0800
  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-04 18:16 +0100
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:35 -0700
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 23:50 -0500
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-04 21:30 -0800
        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 13:58 -0500
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:09 -0800
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Batty <bat@belfry.invalid> - 2016-02-08 14:08 +0000
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-05 07:30 +0100
        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 14:14 -0500
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:19 -0800
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:41 -0500
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 14:49 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:09 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 18:55 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:53 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:50 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 01:57 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:48 -0700
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:08 -0700
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:56 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0700
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:33 -0500
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:07 -0700
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:17 +0100
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 06:46 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 19:35 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 12:07 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 14:34 -0500
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:38 +0100
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0500
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:20 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:51 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:54 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:39 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:01 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:51 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:51 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:26 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:41 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 07:53 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 18:49 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 13:34 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:40 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 06:17 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 01:59 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 02:31 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 06:27 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 16:42 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:21 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 07:57 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 17:14 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:23 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 10:57 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-09 19:10 +0000
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 11:23 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-10 05:27 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 05:45 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:42 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:53 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:29 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-09 23:47 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:22 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:25 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:34 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:28 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 11:57 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:06 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 18:38 -0700
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:02 -0700
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-06 02:20 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:44 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:59 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:04 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:57 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 11:26 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:56 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:54 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:16 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:05 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:39 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:06 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:34 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:58 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-07 21:55 -0800
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:17 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:57 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:07 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 21:46 -0800
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 20:53 -0800
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-11 07:17 +0100
        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-11 01:28 -0500
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-11 01:35 -0500
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-11 01:39 -0500
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-11 17:50 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-11 12:27 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-11 14:41 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-11 12:43 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-12 04:55 +0100
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-11 00:06 -0800
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 04:44 -0800
  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Skip" <skip@dont-email.me> - 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100
  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast TOSEM <7he0ther5ide0f3ternal.Midnight@derbyshire.kooks.out.example.invalid> - 2016-02-07 00:23 +1000
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 17:11 -0500

csiph-web