Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #45995

Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0Ooki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

> On 05/02/2016 1:30 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:

>>> http://littleshop.physics.colostate.edu/activities/atmos1/ColderOnClearThanCloudy.pdf

>> Bwahahahaaa! A high school

> Colorado State University physics department. Are you illiterate or 
> something?

Yeah, it's still a high school level experiment. If what they're
teaching in "college level" physics classes in Colorado is pointing a
temperature gun at a pane of glass and conflating the glass to a
cloud, they must all be high. LOL

>> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14
>> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared
>> atmospheric window

> So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok.

Lunkhead is now attempting to state that the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window extends from 5.5 to 14 micron. LOL!

Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared
range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6
micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at
~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow
window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which
constitutes the infrared atmospheric window.

Water and ice emit at ~11 micron. Right in the center of the
atmospheric infrared window, thus that energy is radiated straight out
to space unimpeded, without heating the atmosphere, even if clouds are
present. Moron. LOL

So the infrared thermometer used in that high school-level experiment
would have been picking up reflected IR from ~5.5 to ~8 microns and
from ~12.5 to ~14 microns, which is outside the infrared atmospheric
window and thus reflecting the heat of the infrared laser diode, thus
skewing the results.

But then, high school-level experiments are the best LunkHead can
do... meanwhile, those peer reviewed studies remain unrefuted, the
NASA SABER study remains undisputed, and LunkHead remains *wrong*. LOL

--------------------------

Kensi The K0ok doesn't want anyone to realize that he was yet again
180 degrees out from reality. To wit, LunkHead k'lamed global warming
causes stronger hurricanes, but in reality:

"The total and UV solar radiation -  A hurricane's maximum potential
energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
_decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."

To wit, LunkHead k'lamed that CO2 causes global warming:

<http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
=================================================================
"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
"When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."

For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
of that total back into space.

{NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
=================================================================

To wit, LunkHead k'lames the planet is warming, in spite of the proof
from NASA, UAH, UK Met, RSS, NSIDC, SIDC SILSO and other research
facilities proving it's cooling:

=================================================================
<http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
*decrease*.

Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
*decrease* from 2005 to 2015.

<http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
cooling has set in... since 1998.

<http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.

Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>

Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
archived it):
<http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.

"There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
is not statistically significant." - James Hansen

<http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
"We have been building models and there are now robust
contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
physical model says it has to be warming."

===============================================================
Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
<http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>

"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
relations problem for us."  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
out of the bag.

You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
===============================================================

You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*, 
you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.

SPNAK!

>>> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered.

>> Look at LunkHead dancing furiously in trying to cover up the fact that
>> he was *wrong* in his contention that global warming caused stronger
>> hurricanes. LOL
>> 
>> "The total and UV solar radiation -  A hurricane's maximum potential
>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>> 
>> Three peer reviewed studies, combined with the NASA SABER study, prove
>> you *wrong* on every single contention you've made, LunkHead... and
>> coincidentally, it proves the entire underlying premise of the Klimate
>> Katastrophe Kook AGW crowd is a fucking lie that only uneducated
>> halfwits believe in. LOL

> *noisy crickets*

Spankard. Backpedal faster, you're losing. LOL

>>> ... 4*pi. For the regular, Platonic solid tetrahedron with
>>> equilaterial-triangle faces, in Euclidean space, it's 6*cos^-1(1/3) -
>>> 4*pi, and will exceed this in positively-curved space and be deficient
>>> of it in negatively-curved space.)

>> Nicely cut-n-pasted from what I'm sure was another of your all-day
>> Google-raping sessions, LunkHead.

And now let's watch the kooktard who's been proven to be *wrong*,
who's had his stupid face rubbed in the reality that the planet is
*cooling*, that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas, that he's a gullible
goof who bought into the lie of AGW because he's a gullible goof who
bought into the lie of liberalism... let's watch that spankard
fucktard spew unrelated froth as means of propping up a weak little
straw man so he can declare some form of 'victolly' before he runs
away with his tail tucked. LOL

<Turns On LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
---------------------------------
> Then you won't mind backing up that accusation with proof. Say, a link 
> to where I allegedly plagiarized that from. C'mon -- if I really did 
> plagiarize it from something I found with a Google search, you really 
> shouldn't have any trouble finding the original. Just paste a phrase 
> from what I wrote into google and try to find something (other than 
> Google Groups's archive of my post, of course) that I copied it from. Go 
> on, and then post the link here. Your failure to do so will be taken as 
> your tacit admission that your accusation was a load of bullshit without 
> any truth to it whatsoever.
> 
> Meanwhile, I will use the formula to derive the result for the 
> triangular chunk of a sphere surface from ninety-degree segments of 
> three great circles:

IOW, you're a lune-loon. LOL

> First, note that such a triangle covers 1/8 of the sphere's surface, as 
> one can, using three mutually perpendicular planes intersecting the 
> sphere,

So you've created 4 lunes as a part of the spherical surface bounded
by two great circles at their axial antipodal intersections, then
introduced another great circle to create triangles from the lunes.
Nothing very difficult yet, LunkHead. They teach this in introductory
geometry, right? Or did the college you attended teach you such
"advanced theory" as aiming a temperature gun at a pane of glass, and
conflating glass with clouds? LOL

> divide it into eight such curved triangular surfaces.

You're not breaking any new ground here, LunkHead.

> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area

You mean its surface area. Sloppiness begets sloppiness. LOL

> is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi

Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead. LOL

You mean the Gaussian curve = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi),
and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r
due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's
Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL

You mean 1 / area^2? Did LunkHead just fuck up his simple geometry?
LOL

Of course, in the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, the non-Euclidean
space would have positive *and* negative Gaussian curvature, and
therefore you'd be working with a Gaussian curvature described by -1 /
area^2 *and* 1 / area^2, right? After all, doesn't a 4-D Minkowski
space-time manifold essentially project and transform the (usually
roughly) spherical (elliptical geometry) objects within it to a plane
geometry with hyperbolic mass "points" at the intersections of the
principal curvatures and tangential plane to produce homeomorphic
isometries? Sure it does. Isn't that what Lobachevsky discovered? Sure
it is. I mean, isn't that how gravity essentially works, via the
metric curvature tensor isometric differential in the tensor field
between the curvature of a Riemannian manifold and Euclidean space, as
described by the geodesic deviation equation? Sure it is.

But don't go there, that way lies you outing yourself as an
introductory college course-level geometry goof.

<snicker>

> divided by its surface area.

Wow, LunkHead "knows" that a sphere of radius r has Gaussian curvature
of 1/r^2. Carl Friedrich Gauss, LunkHead ain't. That's what happens
when you try to rape Wikipedia, you poseur. LOL

Of course, LunkHead is deliberately sticking with simple geometric
shapes, while conveniently neglecting to mention that a 4-D Minkowski
space-time manifold in the presence of an orbiting mass will be more
akin to a complex saddle surface with pseudospherical hyperbolic
surface geometry, and that'd require differential trigonometry of the
eigenvalues of the shape operator to figure out the principal
curvatures, and LunkHead doesn't dare stray into that territory. LOL

He's fine (FSVO "fine", given that he's already fucked up his simple
Gaussian curvature equation above. LOL) as long as he sticks to
describing a simple triangle or sphere wrapped on a non-Euclidean
positive-Gaussian-curvature space, which he can describe via the more
general (and easier) Gauss-Bonnet theorem, but complex shapes which
require surface integrals of the Gaussian curvature to derive the
total curvature and thus the deviation of the sums of a triangle's
angles from 180 degrees would expose him as a Google-raping fraud with
an introductory geometry college class or two under his belt, and as a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy kook merely playing at being an
astrophysicist.

<snicker>

> If the triangle's area is 
> x times the sphere's surface area, then the area times the curvature is 
> x*A*4*pi/A = 4*pi*x. For x = 1/8 that gives pi/2. Previously established 
> was that for a triangle in a curved manifold angle_sum - pi = 
> curvature_integral, which for a surface of constant curvature is just 
> area * curvature, so angle_sum - pi = pi/2 in our example. So, angle_sum 
> = 3*pi/2, or 270 degrees.
> 
> What's interesting here is that this angle sum applies to *any* 
> triangular chunk of the surface of a sphere whose area is 1/8 of the 
> whole sphere. It could be a weird long and narrow triangle with that 
> area and the angle sum will still be 270. Just eyeballing a sphere can 
> tell you that the special case of three of the vertices of an inscribed 
> octahedron (not including any two antipodal ones) will give you a 
> triangle with than angle sum, but not that *any* triangle of the same 
> area will do likewise.
> 
> Now, you go ahead and try to find somewhere I might have plagiarized 
> *that* from as well. And fail. But you are obsessed with proving me to 
> be some sort of fraud, so you will spend a long time fruitlessly 
> spinning your wheels trying before you give up, and that shall be my 
> next victory over you. That, and knowing all sorts of math that you 
> don't, and never will, because you're too ... lunkheaded.
---------------------------------
<Turns Off LunkHead's Spew Spigot>

Whew! That was quite the butthurt bleating, LunkHead. I've got you
desperately raping Google *and* spewing hard about a completely
unrelated topic, all while my steel-toed boot continues to rapid-fire
kick your stoooopid kook ass on the topic that matters... that of
anthropogenic global warming being proven to be a scam by none other
than NASA, that of your continuing to deny the well-known and
thoroughly-studied existence of the 11-micron infrared atmospheric
window, and that of your continuing to deny that CO2 is a global
*coolant* _because_ of that 11-micron infrared atmospheric window, as
the NASA SABER study and the other referenced peer-reviewed studies
proved.

SPNAK!

> *sn<SMACKAKOOK!>

You're not worthy of the <snicker>, LunkHead. The <snicker> is
reserved for those intelligent enough that they don't have to rape
Google and plagiarize / modify website information to try to "prove"
they're not a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroom-goober.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded
that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied
having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of
course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she
failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy
and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the
DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as
such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a
mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's
"been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this
k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief
that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given
19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new
AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per
year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in
decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually
growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had
the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd
used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out
so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's
growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is
slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat);
she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling
for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the
revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to
give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a
warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature
change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same
web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature
change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then
she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being
forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the
driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been
unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher
in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991
Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were
conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the
result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a
conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that
takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to
provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them
as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and
k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that
she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her
ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was
a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame
that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority
of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals),
she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience",
"profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's
thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 561 days and counting
(ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear
that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me
everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in
her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level
of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts
grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more
and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring
for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough
attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL

Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:19 -0800
  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-04 18:16 +0100
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:35 -0700
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 23:50 -0500
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-04 21:30 -0800
        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 13:58 -0500
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:09 -0800
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Batty <bat@belfry.invalid> - 2016-02-08 14:08 +0000
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-05 07:30 +0100
        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 14:14 -0500
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:19 -0800
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:41 -0500
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 14:49 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:09 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 18:55 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:53 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:50 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 01:57 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:48 -0700
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:08 -0700
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:56 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0700
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:33 -0500
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:07 -0700
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:17 +0100
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 06:46 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 19:35 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 12:07 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 14:34 -0500
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:38 +0100
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0500
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:20 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:51 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:54 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:39 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:01 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:51 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:51 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:26 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:41 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 07:53 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 18:49 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 13:34 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:40 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 06:17 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 01:59 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 02:31 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 06:27 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 16:42 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:21 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 07:57 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 17:14 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:23 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 10:57 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-09 19:10 +0000
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 11:23 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-10 05:27 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 05:45 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:42 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:53 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:29 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-09 23:47 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:22 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:25 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:34 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:28 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 11:57 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:06 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 18:38 -0700
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:02 -0700
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-06 02:20 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:44 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:59 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:04 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:57 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 11:26 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:56 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:54 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:16 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:05 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:39 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:06 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:34 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:58 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-07 21:55 -0800
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:17 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:57 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:07 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 21:46 -0800
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 20:53 -0800
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-11 07:17 +0100
        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-11 01:28 -0500
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-11 01:35 -0500
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-11 01:39 -0500
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-11 17:50 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-11 12:27 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-11 14:41 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-11 12:43 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-12 04:55 +0100
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-11 00:06 -0800
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 04:44 -0800
  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Skip" <skip@dont-email.me> - 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100
  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast TOSEM <7he0ther5ide0f3ternal.Midnight@derbyshire.kooks.out.example.invalid> - 2016-02-07 00:23 +1000
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 17:11 -0500

csiph-web