Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #45973
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | <n8ut8l$v4p$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5bda0cadc6d53a77d20e468705959858@dizum.com> <n919ml$ps1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Subject | Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast |
| Message-ID | <063a1950683b63eec1b5ccd593fd83a9@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-02-05 07:30 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Ko0O0ki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:n919ml$ps1$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:
> On 04/02/2016 12:16 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:
Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>
Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.
And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!
Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited
> any good telescopes lately?
Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
<snicker>
========================================================
>>> 1. On a winter's night, with snow on the ground, is it typically colder
>>> or warmer when there is cloud cover versus when it is clear?
Awww, LunkHead is forced to resort to selective snipping of all that
information that proves him *wrong*. LOL
Fixored:
>> Moron keeps bleating out the same questions because moron can't for
>> the life of him conceive of how the world works. It must suck to be so
>> perpetually confounded by reality. LOL
>>
>> Over water or ice, it matters little, due to the ~11-micron infrared
>> atmospheric window, you dolt. Water emits at the ~11-micron infrared
>> window, whereas land emits at longer wavelengths, thus clouds over
>> water, snow or ice will have negligible effect on temperature.
>>
>> Now you get back to denying a well-known and well-studied atmospheric
>> phenomenon, LunkHead... after all, for you moronic libtard Klimate
>> Katastrophe Kooks to be able to continue to k'lame that CO2 is a
>> greenhouse gas, that infrared atmospheric window has to be done away
>> with, because with its existence, your retarded k'lames that CO2 is a
>> greenhouse gas violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics...
>> the NASA SABER study proved that CO2 is a global _coolant_ *because*
>> of that infrared atmospheric window... CO2 emits at the ~11-micron
>> infrared atmospheric window, too, along with at 15-micron and
>> 7-micron... and the 7-micron and 15-micron wavelengths are reabsorbed
>> and re-emitted again and again, with some being emitted at ~11-micron
>> each time, so the great majority of the energy absorbed by CO2 gets
>> emitted at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window and thus chucked
>> straight out to space unimpeded, as the NASA SABER study proved.
>>
>> See what I did there, LunkHead? I corralled you into a discussion you
>> couldn't possibly win, then beat you to a pulp with your own
>> stupidity. You're on *my* turf, you little fucktard. You can't win.
>>
>> And with that, you are well and truly SPNAK!'d. You can't refute
>> NASA's SABER study, you can't refute the reality of the ~11-micron
>> infrared atmospheric window, thus you cannot refute that CO2 causes
>> global *cooling*, not global warming.
>>
>> <snicker>
> BZZZT!
>
> http://littleshop.physics.colostate.edu/activities/atmos1/ColderOnClearThanCloudy.pdf
Bwahahahaaa! A high school-level experiment conflating glass with the
atmosphere? That's your best shot?
In point of fact, if that infrared thermometer used in that high
school-level experiment were utilizing infrared at ~11 microns, there
would be negligible difference between a clear sky and a cloudy sky.
Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14
microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window at which water emits. And lest anyone forget, CO2
also emits at the ~11-micron atmospheric window, thereby decimating
your kooky 'CO2 is a greenhouse gas' AGW contention, and thereby
utterly destroying the entire AGW movement, as the NASA SABER study
proved. The NASA SABER study *proved* that CO2 is a global *cooling*
gas, as is NO... I note you've not even attempted to refute *that* bit
of reality.
You moron. LOL
> You bit my shiny hook at last, ko0ky, and thus exposed your l0on climate
> change denial, and yourself, as intellectually bankrupt.
>
> Final victory on the climate change question goes to kensi.
>
> Thank you for playing, goodbye.
Over land, you moron. Over water or ice, the clouds have negligible
effect because that water or ice emits at the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window, thereby allowing that energy to go right out to
space unhindered.
Nice of you to yet again deny a well-known and thoroughly studied
atmospheric phenomenon, LunkHead... of course, you're yet again 180
degrees out from reality, just as you are about global warming causing
*weaker* hurricanes, just as you are about CO2 causing global
*cooling*, and just as you are about the planet *cooling*. LOL
Christ almighty, LunkHead, if you get any dumber you're going to have
to go back to preschool so they can teach you to tie your shoes. LOL
>>> 2. What might NASA have meant by "an active Sun" *other* than sunspot
>>> activity?
Awww, look at LunkHead snipping like crazy... all that information
that proved you *wrong* must really be causing a lot of butthurt for
you, eh? LOL
Fixored:
>> There's no mention of "sunspot activity" in the *three* referenced
>> peer-reviewed studies proving you *wrong*, you pathetic backpedaling
>> moron. LOL
>>
>> Kensi The K0ok doesn't want anyone to realize that he was yet again
>> 180 degrees out from reality.
>>
>> To wit, LunkHead k'lamed global warming causes stronger hurricanes,
>> but in reality:
>>
>> "The total and UV solar radiation - A hurricane's maximum potential
>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>>
>> To wit, LunkHead k'lamed that CO2 causes global warming:
>>
>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
>> =================================================================
>> "Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
>> James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
>> "When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
>> molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
>>
>> For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
>> absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
>> the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
>> of that total back into space.
>>
>> {NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
>> wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
>> =================================================================
>>
>> To wit, LunkHead k'lames the planet is warming, in spite of the proof
>> from NASA, UAH, UK Met, RSS, NSIDC, SIDC SILSO and other research
>> facilities proving it's cooling:
>>
>> =================================================================
>> <http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
>> The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
>> *decrease*.
>>
>> Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
>> The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
>> *decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
>>
>> <http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
>> Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
>> orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
>> cooling has set in... since 1998.
>>
>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>
>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>
>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>> archived it):
>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>>
>> "There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
>> is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
>>
>> <http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
>> "We have been building models and there are now robust
>> contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
>> Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
>> physical model says it has to be warming."
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>>
>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
>> relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
>> scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
>> out of the bag.
>>
>> You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
>> ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
>> can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*,
>> you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
>> window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
>> your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
>> do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
>> your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
>> and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
>>
>> See what I did there, LunkHead? I backed you into a corner and kicked
>> your stupid teeth in with truth and reality, and in the process proved
>> that the whole Klimate Katastrophe Kook "zOMG! Antruppymudduck
>> Gloobeal Woarmying! DDUUUURRRRHHH!" lie is a fucking scam, believed
>> only by anti-science morons too stupid to understand how things work.
>>
>> LunkHead is an anti-science nitwit who doesn't understand that his
>> k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas violates the First and Second
>> Law of Thermodynamics, which makes Anthropogenic Global Warming a
>> fairy tale that only morons who don't understand how the world works
>> believe in.
>>
>> Spankard yet again gets his stupid ass drop-kicked across Usenet. LOL
> Non-answer.
It was the correct answer, and it proved you *wrong* yet again. You
just don't like that the answer proved you *wrong* while using several
peer-reviewed studies which you find yourself utterly unable to
refute. Just admit you're an anti-science dimwit who bought into the
Klimate Katastrophe Kook 'CO2 is a global warming gas' lie because
it's a libtard cause, that you've been proven *wrong*, that you're a
spankard, and slink away to nurse your wounds, Spankard. LOL
> What I said was mentioned word-for-word was "an active Sun".
> You have k'lamed that they meant something different from "sunspot
> activity" by this. You have been asked to state exactly what.
>
> Our ruling on question #2 is that you answered with (approximately 200
> screedy lines of) *crickets*.
>
> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered.
Look at LunkHead dancing furiously in trying to cover up the fact that
he was *wrong* in his contention that global warming caused stronger
hurricanes. LOL
"The total and UV solar radiation - A hurricane's maximum potential
energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
_decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
Three peer reviewed studies, combined with the NASA SABER study, prove
you *wrong* on every single contention you've made, LunkHead... and
coincidentally, it proves the entire underlying premise of the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook AGW crowd is a fucking lie that only uneducated
halfwits believe in. LOL
>> And you call yourself an astrophysicist? Pshaw, you're not even smart
>> enough to be an astrologer.
> To get angles summing to other than 180 degrees the triangle has to be
> in a curved manifold. The angle sum will be less the more negative the
> curvature's manifold, and greater the more positive, being 180 when the
> manifold is flat. A good example: take the meridians at 0 degrees and 90
> degrees longitude on Earth, and take the segments of these meridians
> from north pole to equator. Add in the arc of the equator joining these
> endpoints by the shortest distance. This is a triangle in Earth's
> surface as a curved manifold, as the sides are segments of great
> circles, which are geodesics of that manifold. The interior angles are
> all 90 degrees, so the angle sum is 270 degrees.
>
> From this can be intuited that the relative scale of the triangle and
> the (possibly negative) radius of curvature of the manifold determines
> the angle excess/deficit, as making the sphere and triangle smaller by
> the same factor preserves the angle sum of 270. (Earth is actually
> (approximately) an oblate spheroid, which doesn't alter the angles,
> though it makes the triangle a not-quite-equilateral isosceles
> triangle.) Make only the triangle smaller and the angle excess shrinks
> toward zero, the angle sum tending to 180, and ditto making only the
> sphere bigger. The exact quantitative relationship is given by the
> Gauss-Bonnet theorem, which states:
>
> integral_M K dA + integral_dM k_g ds = 2*pi*chi(M)
>
> where M is the portion of the manifold enclosed by the triangle (or,
> actually, any figure) and dA differential units of the enclosed area, K
> is the Gaussian curvature over M, dM is the triangle itself (or other
> figure), k_g is the geodesic curvature of this boundary, ds is the
> differential on the perimeter (so integral_M dA = area A and integral_dM
> ds = perimeter s), and chi(M) is the Euler characteristic of M (1 for a
> simply-connected, bounded area with no holes such as our triangle). For
> a piecewise-geodesic boundary like our triangle, integral_dm k_g ds is
> the sum of the angles by which the geodesic segments turn at the corners
> of the boundary, which is pi minus the interior angles. So for the
> triangle, it's 3*pi minus the sum of the interior angles whose sum with
> integral_M K dA equals 2*pi*chi(M) = 2*pi, i.e. 3*pi - angle_sum +
> curvature_integral = 2*pi, or angle_sum - pi = curvature_integral -- the
> deviation of the angle sum from 180 degrees (but expressed in radians)
> equals the integral of the curvature of the manifold over the portion
> enclosed by the triangle. For a manifold of constant curvature (e.g. a
> sphere) that integral equals the triangle's area times the constant
> curvature (so, the angle deviation grows as the triangle's area grows,
> and as the curvature grows); the curvature in question is 1/r^2 where r
> is the radius of curvature (for a sphere, this is the radius of the
> sphere; for a manifold of constant negative curvature, it's actually
> imaginary and of smaller magnitude as the curvature becomes stronger).
>
> The importance of the foregoing to an astrophysicist is, of course,
> general relativity. Space itself (and indeed, space-time) is a curved
> manifold, and in fact this phenomenon affects not only "plane" figures
> but solids, and thus spherical angles, in curved space(-time). For
> instance, a tetrahedron's four interior solid angles' sum will change
> near, say, a black hole or other dense object. (There's no nice tidy
> constant in steradians here analogous to angle sum = pi radians for a
> plane triangle; the sum of the solid angles of a tetrahedron depends on
> the six dihedral angles of the tetrahedron, being twice their sum minus
> 4*pi. For the regular, Platonic solid tetrahedron with
> equilaterial-triangle faces, in Euclidean space, it's 6*cos^-1(1/3) -
> 4*pi, and will exceed this in positively-curved space and be deficient
> of it in negatively-curved space.)
Nicely cut-n-pasted from what I'm sure was another of your all-day
Google-raping sessions, LunkHead. See how hard I've got you working to
justify your existence? Pwned. LOL
>> <sn<SMACKAK00K!>
> Since you have now been thoroughly and utterly *destroyed* on every one
> of your kOoky contentions, our ruling is: Snicker denied.
Since you've been proven *wrong* on every one of your kooky AGW
contentions, the ruling is that you're an anti-science moron who was
so gullible you bought into a lie because it was tied to that other
lie you bought into... the lie of libtardation, LunkHead. LOL
> *sn<SMACKAKOOK!>
You're not worthy of the <snicker>, LunkHead. That's for people who
*aren't* so gullible they buy into stupid lies that are easily
disproved, then defend those lies as means of defending their libtard
insanity.
<snicker>
Why can't you refute the unmanipulated satellite temperature data,
LunkHead? Why do you keep running from it? It's peer-reviewed data,
unmanipulated, unadjusted, from prestigious institutions of
research... and it proves you Klimate Katastrophe Kooks *wrong*. LOL!
<http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
*decrease*.
Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
*decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
<http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
cooling has set in... since 1998.
<http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
archived it):
<http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
"There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
<http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
"We have been building models and there are now robust
contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
physical model says it has to be warming."
===============================================================
Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
<http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
out of the bag.
You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
===============================================================
SPNAK! on LunkHead, who can't refute the reality I promulgate, and
who will most definitely run away. Again.
<snicker>
--
Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded
that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied
having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of
course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she
failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy
and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the
DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as
such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a
mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's
"been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this
k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief
that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given
19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new
AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per
year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in
decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually
growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had
the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd
used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out
so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's
growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is
slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat);
she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling
for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the
revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to
give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a
warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature
change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same
web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature
change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then
she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being
forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the
driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been
unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher
in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991
Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were
conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the
result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a
conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that
takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to
provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them
as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and
k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that
she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her
ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was
a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame
that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority
of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals),
she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience",
"profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's
thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 560 days and counting
(ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear
that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me
everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in
her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level
of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts
grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more
and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring
for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough
attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:19 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-04 18:16 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:35 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 23:50 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-04 21:30 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 13:58 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:09 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Batty <bat@belfry.invalid> - 2016-02-08 14:08 +0000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-05 07:30 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 14:14 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:19 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 14:49 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:09 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 18:55 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:53 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:50 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 01:57 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:48 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:08 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:56 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:33 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:07 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 06:46 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 19:35 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 12:07 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 14:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:38 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:20 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:51 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:54 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:39 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:01 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:51 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:51 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:26 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 07:53 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 18:49 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 13:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:40 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 06:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 01:59 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 02:31 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 06:27 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 16:42 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:21 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 07:57 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 17:14 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:23 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 10:57 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 11:23 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-10 05:27 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 05:45 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:42 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:53 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:29 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-09 23:47 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:22 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:25 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:28 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 11:57 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:06 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 18:38 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:02 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-06 02:20 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:44 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:59 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:04 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:57 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 11:26 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:56 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:54 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:16 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:05 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:39 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:06 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:58 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-07 21:55 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:17 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:57 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:07 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 21:46 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 20:53 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-11 07:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-11 01:28 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-11 01:35 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-11 01:39 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-11 17:50 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-11 12:27 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-11 14:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-11 12:43 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-12 04:55 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-11 00:06 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 04:44 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Skip" <skip@dont-email.me> - 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast TOSEM <7he0ther5ide0f3ternal.Midnight@derbyshire.kooks.out.example.invalid> - 2016-02-07 00:23 +1000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 17:11 -0500
csiph-web