Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

From	Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.devel
Subject	Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion
Date	2025-03-10 12:00 +0100
Message-ID	<KoJ1v-50aR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <KnKM2-4mAk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko0e5-4wRd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko1MR-4xLh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko2SB-4ywi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko2SB-4ywi-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 06:58:08PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
>>If you don't trust the vendor, then it makes no difference whether or not new
>>official firmware/microcode can be uploaded/flashed or not. If you don't trust
>>the vendor, then the initial microcode that came with your device might already
>>be doing things that go against your interests.
>>
>>Of course we cannot have much confidence in a piece of microcode of which we do
>>not have the source code. But we also cannot have much confidence in a piece of
>>hardware with non-flashable firmware of which we don't have the vhdl/verilog
>>sources. So what is the difference?
>
>This is an old argument that didn't work for people holding this 
>opinion before and do I wouldn't expect it to work now. I don't expect 
>that people's opinions on this matter can be changed.


See?

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Thread

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-03-07 22:00 +0100
  Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 12:50 +0100
    Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-03-08 13:50 +0100
      Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Aurélien COUDERC <libre@coucouf.fr> - 2025-03-08 14:30 +0100
      Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion  of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 15:00 +0100
        Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion  of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-10 12:00 +0100
      Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-03-08 16:30 +0100
      Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 16:30 +0100
        Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2025-03-08 16:50 +0100
        Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of  Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de> - 2025-03-08 23:40 +0100
  Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of  Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de> - 2025-03-08 16:40 +0100

csiph-web