Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #116289
| From | Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion |
| Date | 2025-03-08 15:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Ko2SB-4ywi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <KnK9j-4m3r-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KnKM2-4mAk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko0e5-4wRd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko1MR-4xLh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko2SB-4ywi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 02:51:29PM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: >If you don't trust the vendor, then it makes no difference whether or not new >official firmware/microcode can be uploaded/flashed or not. If you don't trust >the vendor, then the initial microcode that came with your device might already >be doing things that go against your interests. > >Of course we cannot have much confidence in a piece of microcode of which we do >not have the source code. But we also cannot have much confidence in a piece of >hardware with non-flashable firmware of which we don't have the vhdl/verilog >sources. So what is the difference? This is an old argument that didn't work for people holding this opinion before and do I wouldn't expect it to work now. I don't expect that people's opinions on this matter can be changed. -- WBR, wRAR
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-03-07 22:00 +0100
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 12:50 +0100
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-03-08 13:50 +0100
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Aurélien COUDERC <libre@coucouf.fr> - 2025-03-08 14:30 +0100
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 15:00 +0100
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-10 12:00 +0100
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-03-08 16:30 +0100
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 16:30 +0100
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2025-03-08 16:50 +0100
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de> - 2025-03-08 23:40 +0100
Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de> - 2025-03-08 16:40 +0100
csiph-web