Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.project > #13757

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

From Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.project, linux.debian.devel
Subject Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion
Date 2025-03-08 13:50 +0100
Message-ID <Ko1MR-4xLh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <KnK9j-4m3r-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KnKM2-4mAk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko0e5-4wRd-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> writes:

> Le Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 07:33:53PM +0100, Simon Josefsson a écrit :
>> pandya@disroot.org writes:
>> 
>> > I urge Debian to rethink its decision to officially include non-free
>> > firmware and correct the social contract. Instead of making non-free
>> > firmware the default, Debian should ensure that users consciously
>> > choose to install it while being made aware of the implications.
>> 
>> I agree and would personally come back to use Debian on some of my
>> laptops if there was a supported way to install Debian from official
>> installer images that did not promote non-free software by including
>> firmware on them.
>> 
>> The recent AMD Microcode vulnerability is a good case-study on the
>> dangers of permitting non-free code to run on your CPU:
>> 
>> https://bughunters.google.com/blog/5424842357473280/zen-and-the-art-of-microcode-hacking
>
> Do not fall for the marketing. What was broken was the DRM which
> forbid you to fix the firmware on your own CPU. This is no more a
> vulnerability than letting you boot your own OS.

My point was that there is no reasonable way to gain confidence about
security properties of any piece of non-free microcode.  Everyone can
now produce AMD microcode that corrupts your machine in advanced ways
that evade detection, but we don't know if such malicious corruption is
included in the official microcode.  Having source code for the
microcode would help gain confidence in it, and is the reasonable
request.  If the request is denied, I would consider the vendor not
trustworthy and look into options.

This is a similar vulnerability as installing a non-free operating
system like Windows.  You essentially have to trust the vendor to
provide you with software, which you have no good way of auditing and
ultimately end up in their control.  It wouldn't be a big problem if
software were free of vulnerabilities and never needed updates, but just
like Windows has had bugs, microcode have bugs.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html

/Simon

Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-03-07 22:00 +0100
  Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 12:50 +0100
    Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-03-08 13:50 +0100
      Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Aurélien COUDERC <libre@coucouf.fr> - 2025-03-08 14:30 +0100
      Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-03-08 16:30 +0100
        Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> - 2025-04-10 11:20 +0200
          Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2025-04-10 14:00 +0200
          Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-04-10 14:00 +0200
          Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Henrik Ahlgren <pablo@seestieto.com> - 2025-04-10 14:00 +0200
      Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 16:30 +0100
        Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2025-03-08 16:50 +0100

csiph-web