Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #82019

Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

From Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot
Subject Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Date 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
Message-ID <IeeG5-elH9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <HTJOx-1x6F-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ie0jL-ecXH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IeeG5-elH9-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (2024-03-04):
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
> > be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
> > cleaned up? (The “disabling daily builds” part being trivial.)
> 
> i would remove the d-i package itself (don't we already set the
> supported architectures?)

No, at least not in debian/control, that's why I'm asking. I would love
to avoid having to maintain a list of architectures…

> Cleanup installer-armel.

ACK.

> Remove armel specific udeb sources (I doubt we hve any).

Doesn't ring a bell.

> I would not try to remove udebs itself but just continue to build them.

Sure, nothing to gain there.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-07 23:30 +0100
  Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 20:00 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 23:30 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 01:40 +0100
        Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Gianluca Renzi <icjtqr@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 07:10 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2024-03-03 20:40 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Ástor Ayllón Lázaro <thosleaf@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 22:00 +0100
  Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-10 09:00 +0100
    Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:00 +0100
      Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:50 +0100
        Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-10 11:50 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-19 18:00 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-19 18:10 +0100
  Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-03 21:10 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2024-03-09 08:00 +0100

csiph-web