Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #82019
| From | Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot |
| Subject | Re: What to do with d-i on armel? |
| Date | 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <IeeG5-elH9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HTJOx-1x6F-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ie0jL-ecXH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IeeG5-elH9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (2024-03-04): > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to > > be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/ > > cleaned up? (The “disabling daily builds” part being trivial.) > > i would remove the d-i package itself (don't we already set the > supported architectures?) No, at least not in debian/control, that's why I'm asking. I would love to avoid having to maintain a list of architectures… > Cleanup installer-armel. ACK. > Remove armel specific udeb sources (I doubt we hve any). Doesn't ring a bell. > I would not try to remove udebs itself but just continue to build them. Sure, nothing to gain there. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-07 23:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 20:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 23:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 01:40 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Gianluca Renzi <icjtqr@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 07:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2024-03-03 20:40 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Ástor Ayllón Lázaro <thosleaf@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 22:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-10 09:00 +0100
Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:00 +0100
Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:50 +0100
Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-10 11:50 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-19 18:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-19 18:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-03 21:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2024-03-09 08:00 +0100
csiph-web