Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #82003

Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

From Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot, linux.debian.ports.arm, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Date 2024-03-03 21:10 +0100
Message-ID <Ie0jL-ecXH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <HTJOx-1x6F-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (2024-01-07):
> With Linux 6.6 we dropped the Marvell specific kernel image, as it
> was not known to work on any of the available devices.  We still have
> another armel kernel left, the one of the Raspberry Pi 0 and 1, which
> uses an ARMv6 CPU.
> 
> This also removed all the udebs from armel, which makes many d-i
> components not longer have fullfiled dependencies and the release stuff
> of course acting up.
> 
> Do we have any armel subarch that can be installed via d-i?

Unless we get something to support in d-i, I'm wondering how to proceed
with dropping support for armel. Unsupported things tend to move to
ports while still being supported by porters, so we don't have much to
do there besides go with the flow. That'd be the first time (that I can
think of) that we have an FTBFS-ing d-i for an architecture that's in
unstable.

Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
cleaned up? (The “disabling daily builds” part being trivial.)

I see no time pressure here, we have a big transition going on, so it
doesn't seem particularly fitting to try and get a d-i release out any
day soon.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-07 23:30 +0100
  Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 20:00 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 23:30 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 01:40 +0100
        Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Gianluca Renzi <icjtqr@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 07:10 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2024-03-03 20:40 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Ástor Ayllón Lázaro <thosleaf@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 22:00 +0100
  Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-10 09:00 +0100
    Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:00 +0100
      Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:50 +0100
        Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-10 11:50 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-19 18:00 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-19 18:10 +0100
  Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-03 21:10 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2024-03-09 08:00 +0100

csiph-web