Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #82003
| From | Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot, linux.debian.ports.arm, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Re: What to do with d-i on armel? |
| Date | 2024-03-03 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Ie0jL-ecXH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HTJOx-1x6F-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (2024-01-07): > With Linux 6.6 we dropped the Marvell specific kernel image, as it > was not known to work on any of the available devices. We still have > another armel kernel left, the one of the Raspberry Pi 0 and 1, which > uses an ARMv6 CPU. > > This also removed all the udebs from armel, which makes many d-i > components not longer have fullfiled dependencies and the release stuff > of course acting up. > > Do we have any armel subarch that can be installed via d-i? Unless we get something to support in d-i, I'm wondering how to proceed with dropping support for armel. Unsupported things tend to move to ports while still being supported by porters, so we don't have much to do there besides go with the flow. That'd be the first time (that I can think of) that we have an FTBFS-ing d-i for an architecture that's in unstable. Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/ cleaned up? (The “disabling daily builds” part being trivial.) I see no time pressure here, we have a big transition going on, so it doesn't seem particularly fitting to try and get a d-i release out any day soon. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-07 23:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 20:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 23:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 01:40 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Gianluca Renzi <icjtqr@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 07:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2024-03-03 20:40 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Ástor Ayllón Lázaro <thosleaf@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 22:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-10 09:00 +0100
Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:00 +0100
Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:50 +0100
Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-10 11:50 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-19 18:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-19 18:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-03 21:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2024-03-09 08:00 +0100
csiph-web