Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #82019

Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot
Subject Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Date Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:30:02 +0100
Message-ID <IeeG5-elH9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <HTJOx-1x6F-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ie0jL-ecXH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IeeG5-elH9-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Mon Mar 4 11:29:42 2024
Old-Return-Path <kibi@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-114.607 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.088, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Organization Debian
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xskfub7xxnh2opzv"
Content-Disposition inline
X-Debian-User kibi
X-Mailing-List <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/142041
List-ID <debian-kernel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20240304112918.gbamws5qvrydm5gv@mraw.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 58
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:29:18 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <20240304112918.gbamws5qvrydm5gv@mraw.org>
X-Original-References <20240107220748.rykbtd7kaniu47yn@shell.thinkmo.de> <20240303200106.3r7kvhoh4qypfuxq@mraw.org> <20240304110524.4midlz46qrnmnvon@shell.thinkmo.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:82019 linux.debian.maint.boot:72201

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (2024-03-04):
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
> > be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
> > cleaned up? (The “disabling daily builds” part being trivial.)
> 
> i would remove the d-i package itself (don't we already set the
> supported architectures?)

No, at least not in debian/control, that's why I'm asking. I would love
to avoid having to maintain a list of architectures…

> Cleanup installer-armel.

ACK.

> Remove armel specific udeb sources (I doubt we hve any).

Doesn't ring a bell.

> I would not try to remove udebs itself but just continue to build them.

Sure, nothing to gain there.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-07 23:30 +0100
  Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 20:00 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 23:30 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 01:40 +0100
        Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Gianluca Renzi <icjtqr@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 07:10 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2024-03-03 20:40 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Ástor Ayllón Lázaro <thosleaf@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 22:00 +0100
  Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-10 09:00 +0100
    Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:00 +0100
      Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:50 +0100
        Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-10 11:50 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-19 18:00 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-19 18:10 +0100
  Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-03 21:10 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
      Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
    Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2024-03-09 08:00 +0100

csiph-web