Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #82002
| From | Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot, linux.debian.ports.arm, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Re: What to do with d-i on armel? |
| Date | 2024-03-03 20:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <IdZQK-ecyb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HTJOx-1x6F-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HUpuq-1X6H-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Emanuele Rocca wrote...
> Any armel users out there? :-)
Fairly late, but just to avoid the impression there aren't any left:
Yes, here.
But that's not an objection against plans in Debian kernel and/or d-i,
I'm using my own kernel, and should I ever have the need of a new
installation, I know how to debootstrap and the rest.
Besides, the hardware is a Seagate DockStar, so
Architecture: armv5tel
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 1
On-line CPU(s) list: 0
Vendor ID: Marvell
Model name: Feroceon-88FR131
and 128 Mbytes of RAM. Running Debian stable already requires some hacks
to not end up in thrashing, I might do a presentation "Running Debian on
small systems" some day about it.
In summary, I'm glad Debian keeps supporting this device - but I'm
aware the good times are in the past and it will very likely become
e-waste before the hardware dies. If not Debian ends the support, the
Linux kernel will.
Christoph
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-07 23:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 20:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 23:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 01:40 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Gianluca Renzi <icjtqr@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 07:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2024-03-03 20:40 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Ástor Ayllón Lázaro <thosleaf@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 22:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-10 09:00 +0100
Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:00 +0100
Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:50 +0100
Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-10 11:50 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-19 18:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-19 18:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-03 21:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2024-03-09 08:00 +0100
csiph-web