Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14560
| From | Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 |
| Date | 2022-10-28 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <FlydA-hjOJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FjqDv-fZP8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FkPTb-gRY4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <FleHT-h7II-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> I did just notice the upstream release contains several other files > worth considering for removal: a bunch of windows executables [1]. I agree and can remove those from the source tarball too. To do that with the current upstream version in salsa though requires me to git reset, re-import the 2022.10.25+ds upstream with updated Files-Excluded, then add back the other commits. I have done that locally but this requires a force push which is not allowed for the debian branch since it is protected. Alternatively I can keep the existing upstream import (which only excludes get-pipenv.py and not the *.exe files) and add the new excluded files in debian/copyright for the next upstream import. Please let me know your preference on these repack options, and I will update accordingly. > Lintian seems to think the source for some html file is missing, but > at first glance that hit may well be a false positive triggered by > some bits of javascript. > Unrelated to any of the above, I pushed some minor changes and > enabled the CI on salsa. Thanks! I noticed the false positive and since the lintian test on the pipeline fails, I will add a lintian-overrides file so that it can pass. I have not pushed that to salsa yet, but I will after hearing your preference with the repack. Ileana
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-10-22 19:40 +0200
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 16:50 +0200
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-10-27 19:20 +0200
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 16:10 +0200
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-10-29 09:30 +0200
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> - 2022-10-31 15:50 +0100
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org> - 2022-10-28 18:20 +0200
csiph-web