Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14571
| From | Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 |
| Date | 2022-10-31 15:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FmEgV-oXA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FjqDv-fZP8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FkPTb-gRY4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <FleHT-h7II-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FlydA-hjOJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <FlOs1-htYH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> You can avoid resetting or forcing anything by increasing the > repacksuffix. As far as both git and the tooling are concerned, that > makes it an all new upstream version without conflicts with the > repo's current content, so pushing to git works just fine. > First update the excluded files in d/copyright and commit that > change, then run with the usual 'gbp import-orig --pristine-tar > --uscan'. When gbp asks you for the upstream version, modify the +ds > part to +ds2 and proceed with that. Thanks! uscan was not quite letting me use gbp import-orig but I was able to update the excluded files and have uscan re-download the new tarball correctly. Then I just had to rename the tarball with the +ds2 version and use gbp import-orig <path to new tarball>. Anyway that produced the intended result, so I pushed that along with the lintian-overrides, and the pipeline passes. >> I totally lost interest in maintaining that package and kind of neglected >> it because of the vendoring and the package itself or rather its upstream. >> Anyways, I thought I've orphaned it long time ago (maybe I forgot to do >> that). So thank you for taking over, I'm sure a lot of users will be happy! No problem! I am happy to help. I added myself as an uploader also, and I do not think there is a need to formally orphan if the team still maintains it (and I will continue to upload). Ileana
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-10-22 19:40 +0200
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 16:50 +0200
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-10-27 19:20 +0200
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 16:10 +0200
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-10-29 09:30 +0200
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> - 2022-10-31 15:50 +0100
Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org> - 2022-10-28 18:20 +0200
csiph-web