Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14571

Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1

From Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1
Date 2022-10-31 15:50 +0100
Message-ID <FmEgV-oXA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <FjqDv-fZP8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FkPTb-gRY4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <FleHT-h7II-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FlydA-hjOJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <FlOs1-htYH-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> You can avoid resetting or forcing anything by increasing the
> repacksuffix. As far as both git and the tooling are concerned, that
> makes it an all new upstream version without conflicts with the
> repo's current content, so pushing to git works just fine.

> First update the excluded files in d/copyright and commit that
> change, then run with the usual 'gbp import-orig --pristine-tar
> --uscan'. When gbp asks you for the upstream version, modify the +ds
> part to +ds2 and proceed with that.

Thanks! uscan was not quite letting me use gbp import-orig but I was
able to update the excluded files and have uscan re-download the new
tarball correctly. Then I just had to rename the tarball with the +ds2
version and use gbp import-orig <path to new tarball>. Anyway that
produced the intended result, so I pushed that along with the
lintian-overrides, and the pipeline passes.

>> I totally lost interest in maintaining that package and kind of neglected
>> it because of the vendoring and the package itself or rather its upstream.
>> Anyways, I thought I've orphaned it long time ago (maybe I forgot to do
>> that). So thank you for taking over, I'm sure a lot of users will be happy!

No problem! I am happy to help. I added myself as an uploader also,
and I do not think there is a need to formally orphan if the team
still maintains it (and I will continue to upload).

Ileana

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-10-22 19:40 +0200
  Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 16:50 +0200
    Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-10-27 19:20 +0200
      Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 16:10 +0200
        Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-10-29 09:30 +0200
          Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> - 2022-10-31 15:50 +0100
  Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1 Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org> - 2022-10-28 18:20 +0200

csiph-web