Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14733

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/15/22 16:18, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/13/22 00:51, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> Dear Python Team
>>
>> Looking at the current state of the 'adding Python 3.11 as a supported
>> version' transition [1], the tracker [2] shows only 12 red packages
>> (excluding unknowns and packages not in testing) remaining, copied
>> below for reference.
>>
>> We believe all FTBFS and autopkgtest regression bugs have already been
>> filed and tagged.
>>
>> The current state of bugs tagged 'python3.11' [3] is 116 resolved and
>> 49 still open.  Many thanks to everyone who has contributed to fixing
>> these, and especially to the organizers of the recent Python sprint
>> [4].
>>
>> As this transition is non-blocking (i.e. uploaded packages are able to
>> migrate ahead of python3-defaults), we could wait for the remaining
>> bugs to be fixed, or for auto-removal to take its course.  However,
>> with the bookworm transition freeze only one month away [5], we'd like
>> to hear from the Python Team within the next week whether they wish to
>> proceed with Python 3.11 being the only supported version for bookworm
>> (in which case we will allow python3-defaults to migrate right now)
>> or, revert the changes in python3-defaults and have Python 3.10 as the
>> only supported version for bookworm.
>>
>> Should it be the former, we'd like an undertaking from the Python Team
>> that they will help resolve the remaining bugs against key packages
>> [6], as these cannot easily be avoided by manual or auto-removals.
>>
>> On behalf of the Release Team
>> Graham
> 
> 
> Hi Graham,
> 
> For OpenStack, I believe I was able to fix all Python 3.11 bugs (often 
> with the help of upstream, a few times, on my own but very trivial fixes 
> like the easy getargspec -> getfullargspec). The remaining filled RC 
> bugs because of Python 3.11, I don't really mind (even if these 5 
> packages are AUTORM, I'm fine with that, they aren't key packages from 
> the OpenStack perspective).
> 
> However, there's still one very annoying bug in flask-restful that makes 
> it not rebuild under Python 3.11. Keystone needs flask-restful, so I 
> *must* fix it.
> 
> Note here that #1024913 is because of another issue (ie: the autopkgtest 
> functional test doesn't support more than one available Python 
> interpreter, though it's easy to fix: simply kill the server between 
> runs...). Though it hides the real FTBFS issue (failure in unit tests), 
> which I believe is probably due to my upgrade of werkzeug 2.2.2 rather 
> than Python 3.11.
> 
> Help would be greatly appreciated fixing this bug. Hopefully, I can get 
> this done during my holidays (and avoid any other work...).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)

FYI, I have just uploaded a new Debian release of this package that 
fixes all the issues, thanks to a colleague of mine that had time to 
help (which I didn't really have...).

So, I believe I'm all good regarding OpenStack packages right now (even 
if that last one was werkzeug 2.2.2 related, not python 3.11).

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 01:00 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 08:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 19:50 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 10:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2022-12-13 11:00 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 11:10 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:10 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 17:20 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-13 13:40 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-18 19:10 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 10:50 +0100
          Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2022-12-19 17:00 +0100
            Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 21:30 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 17:10 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-16 10:50 +0100

csiph-web