Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.net.news.management > #17832
| From | Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.net.news.management, uk.net.news.moderation |
| Subject | Re: Engineered constitutional crisis |
| Date | 2023-01-21 22:50 +0000 |
| Organization | Brymor |
| Message-ID | <ET4$sLWswGzjFwOh@this.machine> (permalink) |
| References | <73973d5e-b4c5-4398-9a80-1da584d7518fn@googlegroups.com> <ID+8IKO18AzjFwub@this.machine> <k32n42Fb1sU1@mid.individual.net> <O3V91oRaCDzjFwcF@this.machine> <k336uiF2n9uU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In message <k336uiF2n9uU1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> writes >On 21 Jan 2023 at 18:36:10 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote: > >> In message <k32n42Fb1sU1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter >> <roger@hayter.org> writes >>> On 21 Jan 2023 at 16:13:41 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>> >>>> In message <XnsAF939221C335237B93@88.198.57.247>, Pamela >>>> <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> writes >>>>> On 14:12 21 Jan 2023, Bryan Morris said: >>>>>> In message <slrntsns3u.3rma.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon >>>>>> Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>>> On 2023-01-21, Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 21/01/2023 in message <k31uuaFr523U1@mid.individual.net> The >>>>>>>> Todal wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please post some examples here. As many as you like. I've not seen >>>>>>>>> any. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Presumably that's a joke? Look at the example of what Ribbens said >>>>>>>> in the quotes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Excellent, so this is your opportunity to explain what moderation >>>>>>> policy or policies my post contravened. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you don't know you don't deserve to be a moderator >>>>> >>>>> As I read this thread, what I see is you making loud complaints but >>>>> failing to follow up with examples when invited. >>>> >>>> I'm not falling into that trap, my name isn't Norman >>>> If you don't know what I mean you're part of the problem >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are you posting just for a moan or do you intend to make some >>>>> constructive criticism? >>>> >>>> Apart from one recently appointed moderator (who never uses 1 word when >>>> 6 will do;) ) generally the remaining moderators use their positions to >>>> make snide , off topic, political remarks in a legal newsgroup >>> >>> But you don't need to be a moderator to do that in ulm! It is not >>>against the >>> moderation policy. >> >>> >> It SHOULD be a policy that moderators of a moderated group confine >> themselves to dealing with issues related directly to the objectives of >> the group (in this case legal issues). The moderators should also deal >> with snide , off topic, political remarks made by other posters. That >> surely is the role of a moderator > >You are welcome to request a discussion of the setting up of such a newsgroup, >but that doesn't happen to be the written policy of ULM, which the electorate >supported x years ago. > > Thank you for your condescending response that I'm welcome to request a discussion If you don't understand responsibilities of those given authority to act as a moderator you probably don't understand the responsibilities of judges in applying laws in a neutral way > > >> >>> Indeed it was only a couple of years ago that Jeremy Corbyn was being >>> regularly accused in ulm of being a traitor to the UK, a supporter of >>> terrorists and an anti-semite. Much worse than is currently being said about >>> any current Tory. >>> >>> But somehow that didn't worry you; becuse you supported that >>>particular bit of >>> lying propaganda perhaps? >> >> 2 years ago from memory I no longer subscribed to that group (and last >> year, being in hospital for over 2 months, I was off usenet for a long >> time.) But no, and I won't give my opinion on Corbyn who I once knew, >> comments about him, unless relevant in a legal newsgroup, should not be >> posted there. > >I apologise if you were not one of the mob of like-minded people who supported >the media campaign against Corbyn. But many who did are now complaining about >the Todal and Jon Ribbens saying unkind things about the Tories. (By the way, >I really wish I was in a position to claim to have "carelessly" "forgotten" to >pay a million pounds of tax.) > > I refuse to be drawn into a political discussion on this group about what you call the "media campaign against Corbyn" Though from that remark of yours I conclude you support Corbyn's views for which he has lost the Labour whip > >>> >>> >>> I believe your protestss are totally hypocritical and designed to score >>> party-political points. I am unsurprised, but sad, to see that >>>Tories also see >>> it as important to support Keith Starmer. One would almost think he >>>was one of >>> them. >>> >>> >> Keith? > >Who knows? He sounds like a Keith and has more in common with Ramsay Macdonald >than Keir Hardie! > > -- Bryan Morris
Back to uk.net.news.management | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 17:05 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-19 18:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 21:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 21:53 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 22:04 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-19 22:14 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 01:31 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 01:52 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 02:12 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 02:40 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 19:57 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 02:37 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 08:41 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 09:22 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:30 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:00 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:15 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:02 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:12 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:17 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:21 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 16:13 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 17:53 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 18:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:23 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 22:50 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:23 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 21:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:44 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:26 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 15:47 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 11:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:43 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:48 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Algernon Goss-Custard <Ben@nowhere.com> - 2023-01-21 15:30 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 15:51 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:28 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:22 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:49 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:20 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:27 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 20:01 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:28 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-22 09:22 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:01 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:17 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:30 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 21:08 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-22 08:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 01:20 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:04 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-23 13:17 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:34 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roland Perry <roland@perry.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 06:37 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 08:55 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:35 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 17:09 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-29 19:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-30 00:52 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-30 01:21 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis JNugent <jenningsandco@mail.com> - 2023-01-21 17:18 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:13 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 12:15 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 12:47 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:11 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:18 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 16:00 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:59 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 13:06 +0000
csiph-web