Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.net.news.management > #17830
| From | Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.net.news.management, uk.net.news.moderation |
| Subject | Re: Engineered constitutional crisis |
| Date | 2023-01-21 22:23 +0000 |
| Organization | Metazoon |
| Message-ID | <k336uiF2n9uU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <73973d5e-b4c5-4398-9a80-1da584d7518fn@googlegroups.com> <ID+8IKO18AzjFwub@this.machine> <k32n42Fb1sU1@mid.individual.net> <O3V91oRaCDzjFwcF@this.machine> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 21 Jan 2023 at 18:36:10 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote: > In message <k32n42Fb1sU1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter > <roger@hayter.org> writes >> On 21 Jan 2023 at 16:13:41 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >> >>> In message <XnsAF939221C335237B93@88.198.57.247>, Pamela >>> <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> writes >>>> On 14:12 21 Jan 2023, Bryan Morris said: >>>>> In message <slrntsns3u.3rma.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon >>>>> Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>> On 2023-01-21, Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 21/01/2023 in message <k31uuaFr523U1@mid.individual.net> The >>>>>>> Todal wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please post some examples here. As many as you like. I've not seen >>>>>>>> any. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Presumably that's a joke? Look at the example of what Ribbens said >>>>>>> in the quotes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Excellent, so this is your opportunity to explain what moderation >>>>>> policy or policies my post contravened. >>>>> >>>>> If you don't know you don't deserve to be a moderator >>>> >>>> As I read this thread, what I see is you making loud complaints but >>>> failing to follow up with examples when invited. >>> >>> I'm not falling into that trap, my name isn't Norman >>> If you don't know what I mean you're part of the problem >>>> >>>> >>>> Are you posting just for a moan or do you intend to make some >>>> constructive criticism? >>> >>> Apart from one recently appointed moderator (who never uses 1 word when >>> 6 will do;) ) generally the remaining moderators use their positions to >>> make snide , off topic, political remarks in a legal newsgroup >> >> But you don't need to be a moderator to do that in ulm! It is not against the >> moderation policy. > >> > It SHOULD be a policy that moderators of a moderated group confine > themselves to dealing with issues related directly to the objectives of > the group (in this case legal issues). The moderators should also deal > with snide , off topic, political remarks made by other posters. That > surely is the role of a moderator You are welcome to request a discussion of the setting up of such a newsgroup, but that doesn't happen to be the written policy of ULM, which the electorate supported x years ago. > >> Indeed it was only a couple of years ago that Jeremy Corbyn was being >> regularly accused in ulm of being a traitor to the UK, a supporter of >> terrorists and an anti-semite. Much worse than is currently being said about >> any current Tory. >> >> But somehow that didn't worry you; becuse you supported that particular bit of >> lying propaganda perhaps? > > 2 years ago from memory I no longer subscribed to that group (and last > year, being in hospital for over 2 months, I was off usenet for a long > time.) But no, and I won't give my opinion on Corbyn who I once knew, > comments about him, unless relevant in a legal newsgroup, should not be > posted there. I apologise if you were not one of the mob of like-minded people who supported the media campaign against Corbyn. But many who did are now complaining about the Todal and Jon Ribbens saying unkind things about the Tories. (By the way, I really wish I was in a position to claim to have "carelessly" "forgotten" to pay a million pounds of tax.) >> >> >> I believe your protestss are totally hypocritical and designed to score >> party-political points. I am unsurprised, but sad, to see that Tories also see >> it as important to support Keith Starmer. One would almost think he was one of >> them. >> >> > Keith? Who knows? He sounds like a Keith and has more in common with Ramsay Macdonald than Keir Hardie! -- Roger Hayter
Back to uk.net.news.management | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 17:05 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-19 18:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 21:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 21:53 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 22:04 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-19 22:14 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 01:31 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 01:52 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 02:12 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 02:40 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 19:57 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 02:37 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 08:41 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 09:22 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:30 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:00 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:15 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:02 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:12 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:17 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:21 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 16:13 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 17:53 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 18:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:23 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 22:50 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:23 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 21:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:44 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:26 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 15:47 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 11:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:43 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:48 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Algernon Goss-Custard <Ben@nowhere.com> - 2023-01-21 15:30 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 15:51 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:28 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:22 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:49 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:20 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:27 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 20:01 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:28 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-22 09:22 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:01 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:17 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:30 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 21:08 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-22 08:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 01:20 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:04 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-23 13:17 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:34 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roland Perry <roland@perry.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 06:37 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 08:55 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:35 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 17:09 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-29 19:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-30 00:52 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-30 01:21 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis JNugent <jenningsandco@mail.com> - 2023-01-21 17:18 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:13 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 12:15 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 12:47 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:11 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:18 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 16:00 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:59 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 13:06 +0000
csiph-web