Groups > uk.net.news.management > #17826

Re: Engineered constitutional crisis

From	Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine>
Newsgroups	uk.net.news.management, uk.net.news.moderation
Subject	Re: Engineered constitutional crisis
Date	2023-01-21 18:36 +0000
Organization	Brymor
Message-ID	<O3V91oRaCDzjFwcF@this.machine> (permalink)
References	<73973d5e-b4c5-4398-9a80-1da584d7518fn@googlegroups.com> <WsYLjvMoL$yjFw2q@this.machine> <XnsAF939221C335237B93@88.198.57.247> <ID+8IKO18AzjFwub@this.machine> <k32n42Fb1sU1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In message <k32n42Fb1sU1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter 
<roger@hayter.org> writes
>On 21 Jan 2023 at 16:13:41 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote:
>
>> In message <XnsAF939221C335237B93@88.198.57.247>, Pamela
>> <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> writes
>>> On 14:12  21 Jan 2023, Bryan Morris said:
>>>> In message <slrntsns3u.3rma.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon
>>>> Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes
>>>>> On 2023-01-21, Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 21/01/2023 in message <k31uuaFr523U1@mid.individual.net> The
>>>>>> Todal wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please post some examples here. As many as you like. I've not seen
>>>>>>> any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Presumably that's a joke? Look at the example of what Ribbens said
>>>>>> in the quotes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Excellent, so this is your opportunity to explain what moderation
>>>>> policy or policies my post contravened.
>>>>
>>>> If you don't know you don't deserve to be a moderator
>>>
>>> As I read this thread, what I see is you making loud complaints but
>>> failing to follow up with examples when invited.
>>
>> I'm not falling into that trap, my name isn't Norman
>> If you don't know what I mean you're part of the problem
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you posting just for a moan or do you intend to make some
>>> constructive criticism?
>>
>> Apart from one recently appointed moderator (who never uses 1 word when
>> 6 will do;) ) generally the remaining moderators use their positions to
>> make snide , off topic, political remarks in a legal newsgroup
>
>But you don't need to be a moderator to do that in ulm! It is not against the
>moderation policy.

>
It SHOULD be a policy that moderators of a moderated group confine 
themselves to dealing with issues related directly to the objectives of 
the group (in this case legal issues). The moderators should also deal 
with snide , off topic, political remarks made by other posters. That 
surely is the role of a moderator

>  Indeed it was only a couple of years ago that Jeremy Corbyn was being
>regularly accused in ulm of being a traitor to the UK,  a supporter of
>terrorists and an anti-semite. Much worse than is currently being said about
>any current Tory.
>
>But somehow that didn't worry you; becuse you supported that particular bit of
>lying propaganda perhaps?

2 years ago from memory I no longer subscribed to that group (and last 
year, being in hospital for over 2 months, I was off usenet for a long 
time.) But no, and I won't give my opinion on Corbyn who I once knew, 
comments about him, unless relevant in a legal newsgroup, should not be 
posted there.
>
>
>I believe your protestss are totally hypocritical and designed to score
>party-political points. I am unsurprised, but sad, to see that Tories also see
>it as important to support Keith Starmer. One would almost think he was one of
>them.
>
>
Keith?

-- 
Bryan Morris

Thread

Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 17:05 +0000
  Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-19 18:25 +0000
    Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 21:36 +0000
      Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 21:53 +0000
        Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 22:04 +0000
          Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-19 22:14 +0000
            Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 01:31 +0000
              Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 01:52 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 02:12 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 02:40 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 19:57 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 02:37 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 08:41 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 09:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:00 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:15 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:02 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:12 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:21 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 16:13 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 17:53 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 18:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:23 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 22:50 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:23 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 21:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:44 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:26 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 15:47 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 11:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:48 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Algernon Goss-Custard <Ben@nowhere.com> - 2023-01-21 15:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 15:51 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:28 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:49 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:20 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:27 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 20:01 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:28 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-22 09:22 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:01 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:30 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 21:08 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-22 08:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 01:20 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:04 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-23 13:17 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:34 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roland Perry <roland@perry.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 06:37 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 08:55 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:36 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:35 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 17:09 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-29 19:25 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-30 00:52 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-30 01:21 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis JNugent <jenningsandco@mail.com> - 2023-01-21 17:18 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:13 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 12:15 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 12:47 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:11 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:18 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 16:00 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:59 +0000
                Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 13:06 +0000

csiph-web