Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373038

Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window"

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window"
Date 2016-09-27 13:18 -0700
Message-ID <D4102231.7EA18%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <ahjdguer003.g@perch.invalid> <D41006FF.7E9C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <hjgdavuc793.gji@perch.invalid> <D4100E21.7E9DE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ahfadgji3033.34@perch.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/27/16, 1:01 PM, in article ahfadgji3033.34@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 9/27/16, 11:33 AM, in article hjgdavuc793.gji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article ahjdguer003.g@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>> 
>>>>>> The fact he was ignorant is not a shame for him at all... but the fact he
>>>>>> trolled me over it is. That is why he is running... and why I find it so
>>>>>> amusing to keep posting the same post in an effort to get him to reply.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> He never will, though... he, like you, is ashamed of his ignorance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Oh yeah.  I am so ashamed for pwning you.
>>>> 
>>>> See: you screwed up, got ashamed, and are STILL trolling.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Tard, your boneheaded script wrote to whatever window had focus and
>>> you argued that that was a good design.
>> 
>> Please quote the argument you mean.
> 
> So now you don't think your script was a good design?  I agree.

Please quote the argument you mean.

Do not run off. Do not ask other questions. Do not dodge or move goal posts
or otherwise wiggle out of your claim.

Please quote the argument you mean.

>>> Moron.  Stay away from computers.
>> 
>> You also never showed a single instance where the script would fail...
> 
> Sure I did. 

Ah, then I missed it. My apologies. Link?

> I demonstrated your hair-brained method of writing to the top window in a
> video, showing how commands from different scripts get intermixed.

By all means please do re-post the link. I missed it and apologize.

>> but then whined a whole lot. With that said, when you asked if it could run
>> into trouble if another script was running at the same time I noted it
>> could... as could a script which referenced those same windows by ID and not
>> index!
> 
> No they would not.

LOL! Keep in mind I have shown you videos proving what I told you.

And below you show you STILL do not get it: a script targeting the TOP
window will send the messages to the TOP window. A script targeting a window
with ID 1234 will send the messages to the window with ID 1234.

Whether they are the right or wrong window depends on what you, the
programmer, WANT. The script does not know what it is "supposed" to do in
any way other than doing what it is told!

> A script targeting a window by windowid is not going to write to the wrong
> window.



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 08:39 -0700
  Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 18:25 +0200
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:18 -0700
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:05 +0200
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:34 -0700
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:13 +0000
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:22 -0700
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:29 +0200
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
              Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:55 -0700
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:33 +0000
            Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:53 -0700
              Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 20:01 +0000
                Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 13:18 -0700
                Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 21:49 +0000
        Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:54 +0000
          Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
  Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:09 +0000
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:58 +0000
      Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
    Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:39 -0700

csiph-web