Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373000
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" |
| Date | 2016-09-27 11:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D41006FF.7E9C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | <D40FE0C3.7E97E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <nse6hd$2u4$3@dont-email.me> <D40FF80C.7E9AB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ahjdguer003.g@perch.invalid> |
On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article ahjdguer003.g@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 9/27/16, 9:25 AM, in article nse6hd$2u4$3@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
>> <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>
>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>>>
>>>> Curious why you denied you were the one talking about the script's window
>>>> in the following exchange:
>>>>
>>>> Owl:
>>>> -----
>>>> For example, Script1 inadvertently sends something to Script2's
>>>> window: ...
>>>> ------
>>>
>>> Stop lying, imbecile
>>
>> Ah, those damned unquotable lies of mine. Keep in mind that is an exact
>> quote from Owl.
>
> Out of context. You later referenced "the script's window" while referring
> to the script editor's window, in a lame attempt to muddy the waters.
I *responded* to your use. You then asked why. I gave you a very full answer
you ran from. Here part of it is again:
* The ONLY windows being controlled by these scripts are the ones from
the terminal. In these cases the windows can be referenced by ID,
index, and more but in NO case are they in a situation where another
script cannot control them at ANY time, even in the middle of one
script running.
* I am the one who taught you this (and even after you were told you kept
asking) and then you trolled and pretended I did not know this or did not
understand the implication of referencing windows by ID or index!
* Scripts can run in windows but they need not. Even if they do,
though, they are not the ones being controlled, nor do they in any way
"own" any of the windows which are being controlled by the scripts. Again,
ANY script can send messages to ANY window... by index, ID, or more.
* The script editors' windows (the one the scripts are in) are NOT being
controlled by the scripts we have been looking at. They COULD be, but they
are not. These windows (the scripts' windows) are completely irrelevant to
the conversation EXCEPT when you keep talking about them and use the term
"script's windows" to maybe (mean) the terminal's windows because that is
how lost you are!
* When I respond to you speaking of the "script's windows" and note you are
lost, I mean whichever windows you are talking about: either the windows of
the script editor, which is not relevant, or the windows the scripts are
referencing which are NOT the script's windows but you are too lost to
understand that!
> When I then tell you that NO that is NOT the window I am talking about,
> you start dancing. Keep it up though. The more you do it, the dumber
> you look.
By all means DO explain what you mean. I have asked you half a dozen times
or more only to have you try to turn things around...
Owl:
-----
For example, Script1 inadvertently sends something to Script2's
window: ...
------
Snit:
-----
The scripts windows are not even the ones being discussed! It is
the terminal windows which are having things done with them!
This is a concept you keep getting wrong over and over and over.
-----
Owl:
-----
What the FUCK are you babbling about NOW? I am NOT talking
about the script's window you MORON.
-----
You screwed up. You could have just admitted to it and moved on... but you
opted to troll instead, so I am rubbing your nose in your mess.
>> The fact he was ignorant is not a shame for him at all... but the fact he
>> trolled me over it is. That is why he is running... and why I find it so
>> amusing to keep posting the same post in an effort to get him to reply.
>>
>> He never will, though... he, like you, is ashamed of his ignorance.
>
> Oh yeah. I am so ashamed for pwning you.
See: you screwed up, got ashamed, and are STILL trolling.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 08:39 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 18:25 +0200
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:18 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:05 +0200
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:34 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:13 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:22 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:29 +0200
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:55 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:33 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:53 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 20:01 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 13:18 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 21:49 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:54 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:09 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 18:58 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0700
Re: Ping Owl: Your reference to "Script2's window" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:39 -0700
csiph-web