Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #416068
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Speed of light |
| Date | 2017-04-13 00:36 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <9102685.nUPlyArG6x@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <37df6911-a6e4-4de9-9038-85c14a56a021@googlegroups.com> <2023753.ElGaqSPkdT@PointedEars.de> <54058103-b5e1-45f1-bc85-bff3184f74c7@googlegroups.com> <1642596.tdWV9SEqCh@PointedEars.de> <a2b59523-dd33-4e53-9cf5-7a7f3c13de95@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto wrote: > On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 2:49:45 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn > wrote: Attribution *line*, _not_ attribution novel. >> The speed of light in vacuum is c₀ = 299'792'458 m∕s. > > This is an artificially This is gibberish. But if you mean “this is artificially”, then no, it is not: It is the result of increasingly precise attempts at measurement. > The fields of QFT defined speed and it is based on the circular > definition for the meter that a meter is 1/299,792,458 light-second. Such a nonsense, it is not even wrong. Instead: By 1983, measurements of the speed of light in vacuum had become so precise that, whereas in the International System of Units (SI) previously the speed of light in vacuum had been based on the meter, with the meter defined based on the wavelength of a specific emission line, it is now the other way around: the meter is defined as 1∕299'792'458 of the distance that light travels in vacuum in 1 second. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre#Wavelength_definition> >> You can either say that the vacuum is the medium through which (_not_: by >> which) light is transmitted, or as vacuum is defined as “space void of >> matter” (QFTs notwithstanding), that there is no medium. It is usually >> generally stated that the transmission of light, and electromagnetic >> radiation in general, does not require a medium. > > The fields QFT do not exist without a medium. Not even wrong. > Weinberg said that the fields in QFT are stress and stains in a medium. Most likely he did not. But you may cite evidence. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Science School The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Science School The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-09 13:33 -0700
Re: Science School Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2017-04-11 10:10 +0800
Re: Science School Paul Colquhoun <newsposter@andor.dropbear.id.au> - 2017-04-11 17:39 +1000
Re: Science School Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 15:06 +0200
Re: Science School Jolie Osokuro <uuol@oowo.ou> - 2017-04-11 13:32 +0000
Re: Science School Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 15:48 +0200
Re: Science School kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 08:25 -0700
Re: Science School Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-04-11 18:16 +0200
Re: Science School Wendi Maddox <ox@awdodww.oe> - 2017-04-14 14:40 +0000
Speed of light (was: Science School) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 18:21 +0200
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 20:49 +0200
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 12:17 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 22:00 +0200
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 06:34 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 00:36 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 05:29 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 14:41 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:07 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:20 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:25 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:43 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:53 -0700
Re: Speed of light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 05:47 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:15 +0200
Re: Speed of light moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 16:54 +0000
Re: Speed of light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 10:44 -0700
Re: Speed of light moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 21:33 +0000
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-11 20:22 +0000
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 07:16 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-12 15:49 +0000
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-12 10:04 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 05:22 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 16:33 +0000
Re: Science School Nobody <nobody@nowhere.nohow> - 2017-04-11 00:41 -0400
csiph-web