Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #416229
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Speed of light |
| Date | 2017-04-13 21:33 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <ocoqr1$u6e$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <a2b59523-dd33-4e53-9cf5-7a7f3c13de95@googlegroups.com> <9102685.nUPlyArG6x@PointedEars.de> <4ad5a7cb-d2e9-4202-8068-5cbcd2991ce3@googlegroups.com> <ocoag8$o3c$3@pcls7.std.com> <a0c2d947-3d0e-47a6-a038-58832b004c9f@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 12:54:34 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >> >> >On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 6:36:29 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn= >> > wrote: >> >> >> > Weinberg said that the fields in QFT are stress and stains in a medium. >> >> >> Most likely he did not. But you may cite evidence. >> >> >Page 25 in his book "Dream Of A Final Theory". >> >> No, Stupid Ken. He said a field is "a sort of a stress in space, >> something like the various sorts of stress that are possible within >> a solid body, but a field is a stress in space itself." Notice he >> doesn't mention needing a medium, it is a sort of a stress in space. >> Note he was making comparisons so that people can understand it. >Moron, no medium no stress......he avoided saying medium by saying >stress in space. What that mean is that space is some sort of >undefined medium. No, Stupid Ken. That is all words you put in his mouth. He never mentioned any medium (YOU did!) or a need for one. He also said it was "sort of a stress", not an actual stress. Remember, Stupid Ken, the photon is neither a pure wave nor a pure particle. One of the particle-like characteristics of the photon is not needing any medium. >> Also he mentions the electron field (not the electrIC field, the >> electrON field, whose quantum manifestations are the electron). >> I repeat an earlier question: Do you believe the electron needs >> a medium to propagate, since you believe the quantum manifestation >> of the electric field, the photon, needs one? Why? No answer, Stupid Ken? Since Weinberg said that electrons are quantum manifestations of the electron field, do you believe that electrons need a medium to propagate?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Science School The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Science School The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-09 13:33 -0700
Re: Science School Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2017-04-11 10:10 +0800
Re: Science School Paul Colquhoun <newsposter@andor.dropbear.id.au> - 2017-04-11 17:39 +1000
Re: Science School Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 15:06 +0200
Re: Science School Jolie Osokuro <uuol@oowo.ou> - 2017-04-11 13:32 +0000
Re: Science School Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 15:48 +0200
Re: Science School kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 08:25 -0700
Re: Science School Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-04-11 18:16 +0200
Re: Science School Wendi Maddox <ox@awdodww.oe> - 2017-04-14 14:40 +0000
Speed of light (was: Science School) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 18:21 +0200
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 20:49 +0200
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 12:17 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 22:00 +0200
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 06:34 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 00:36 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 05:29 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 14:41 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:07 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:20 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:25 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:43 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:53 -0700
Re: Speed of light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 05:47 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:15 +0200
Re: Speed of light moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 16:54 +0000
Re: Speed of light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 10:44 -0700
Re: Speed of light moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 21:33 +0000
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-11 20:22 +0000
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 07:16 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-12 15:49 +0000
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-12 10:04 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 05:22 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 16:33 +0000
Re: Science School Nobody <nobody@nowhere.nohow> - 2017-04-11 00:41 -0400
csiph-web