Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #66546

Re: SQL filesortcc question

From Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: SQL filesortcc question
Date 2015-07-30 03:04 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87k2ti4cza.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References (13 earlier) <mpbbnm$nca$1@dont-email.me> <871tfq60jm.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <mpbmjv$1nt$1@dont-email.me> <87pp3a4ghd.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <mpbt8v$j9e$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:

> On 30/07/15 01:49, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
>>
>>> On 29/07/15 23:50, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 29/07/15 17:14, James Kuyper wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>>> That strikes me as so implausible that I must favor a different
>>>>>> explanation: you're simply prejudiced against making any changes to C
>>>>>> whatsoever. And that must indeed be a prejudice, not a reasoned
>>>>>> judgment, because the idea that C as originally standardized was so
>>>>>> perfect that it could not be improved upon is just plain ridiculous.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would argue that it is a reasoned judgement *even though* C90 isn't
>>>>> perfect. C90 /must/ remain, for the *practical* reason that it works
>>>>> everywhere. For me, the ability to write /*this*/ like //this
>>>>> isn't sufficient compensation for one of my users no longer being able
>>>>> to compile my code.
>>>>
>>>> But your ability to write //this rather than /*this*/
>>>> does not prevent a single user from compiling your code.
>>>
>>> Because it's you saying it, I'm trying hard to see some sense in what
>>> you say, but I'm afraid I'm failing. Okay, let's try this: it's
>>> certainly true that the ability itself doesn't prevent a user from
>>> compiling my code *provided that* I do not avail myself of that
>>> ability - and indeed that's the route I take. But somehow I don't
>>> think that's what you mean.
>>
>> No, that's exactly what I mean.  You are railing against changes that
>> you do not need to avail yourself of.
>
> Yes.
>
>> I have no complaint about your
>> rational choice to use the smallest practical subset of C that suits
>> your needs, but what is your argument against the growth of C in ways
>> that are not incompatible with that?
>
> This molehill is well on its way to becoming a Munro, isn't it?

What do you mean by this?  I don't know what it is the molehill, what is
the Munro, and who is making the one from the other.  Do you mean that
your main contention ("I'm against making changes to C") is trivial?  Do
mean that I'm making too much of it by asking you to explain your
reasoning for that position?

> C90 has three massive advantages in its favour:
>
> 1) it's really, really fast;
> 2) it's really, really portable;
> 3) it's really, really simple.
>
> C99 and C11 are both less portable and less simple than C90 (although
> I wouldn't want to rank them against each other, since I understand
> that some C11 features are C99 features made optional, which would
> actually increase portability relative to C99 for those not using
> those features).
>
> It is my contention that the extra features of C99 and C11 do not
> compensate for the loss of portability and simplicity that is entailed
> in adding new features to /any/ language.

So the problems are all for other people -- they might have to learn a
more complex language (because there might be no one around to tell them
to just learn C90) and they might loose portability, again because of
bad advice?

When you wrote "For me, the ability to write /*this*/ like //this isn't
sufficient compensation for one of my users no longer being able to
compile my code" were you just being rhetorical?  Did you mean to say
that whilst *you* know how to get your code to compile everywhere, other
people might be seduced into using less universally supported features?
If so, I don't want to argue that point -- you may be right about it --
it was what you seemed to be saying about the effect of the language
changes on *your* code and *your* aim of portability that I had a
problem with.

<snip>
-- 
Ben.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

SQL filesortcc question doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2015-07-15 20:40 +0000
  Re: SQL filesortcc question Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2015-07-15 16:08 -0500
  Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-15 17:15 -0400
    Re: SQL filesortcc question doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2015-07-15 23:22 +0000
    Re: SQL filesortcc question jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-07-16 18:35 +0200
      Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-16 17:48 +0100
        Re: SQL filesortcc question jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-07-16 19:38 +0200
          Re: SQL filesortcc question doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2015-07-16 19:48 +0000
            Re: SQL filesortcc question jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-07-16 22:17 +0200
              Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-07-16 21:44 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2015-07-16 23:51 +0000
              Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-17 09:05 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2015-07-16 23:52 +0000
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-17 11:36 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> - 2015-07-17 22:22 +0000
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-17 18:44 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-18 11:13 +1200
              Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-16 22:06 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2015-07-16 23:52 +0000
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-17 01:24 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2015-07-17 00:26 +0000
              Re: SQL filesortcc question doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2015-07-16 23:50 +0000
          Re: SQL filesortcc question John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 13:39 -0700
        Re: SQL filesortcc question doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2015-07-16 19:48 +0000
        Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-17 09:07 +1200
        Re: SQL filesortcc question Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-07-16 16:05 -0700
        Re: SQL filesortcc question David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 17:28 -0700
        Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-20 11:13 -0700
          Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-20 19:27 +0100
            Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-21 08:46 +1200
              Re: SQL filesortcc question raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-07-22 15:12 +0000
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-26 11:55 +1200
              Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 15:01 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-26 11:51 +1200
            Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-25 10:02 -0700
              Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-27 23:35 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-28 14:16 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-28 04:49 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-27 23:25 -0500
                Re: SQL filesortcc question raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-07-28 09:32 +0000
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-28 10:22 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-27 22:33 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-28 04:57 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-28 16:38 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-28 00:51 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-28 07:06 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-28 20:32 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-28 10:02 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-28 22:08 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 18:17 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-29 12:14 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-29 11:27 -0500
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-29 13:01 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-29 17:33 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-29 21:07 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-29 16:33 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-29 22:12 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-07-29 23:50 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-30 00:13 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-07-30 01:49 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-30 02:07 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-07-30 03:04 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-30 08:25 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-30 09:15 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-30 17:17 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-07-30 17:00 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-30 17:12 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-30 15:12 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-30 23:13 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-07-31 10:29 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-31 08:10 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-31 11:12 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-07-31 22:56 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-31 18:34 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-01 13:55 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-01 07:13 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-01 15:36 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-01 09:19 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-08-01 18:16 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-01 15:30 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-08-02 09:00 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-08-02 09:19 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-08-09 14:23 +0000
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-02 06:35 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-02 19:11 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-02 10:28 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-03 09:04 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-03 00:19 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-03 13:55 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-03 07:03 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-03 16:53 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-09-06 09:19 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-06 21:20 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-09-05 14:07 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-06 12:24 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-09-06 13:49 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-06 15:41 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-09-07 07:24 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-07 17:04 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-02 06:48 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-08-04 08:00 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-04 08:52 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-09-05 11:56 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-08-04 23:45 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-05 08:45 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-09-05 12:00 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-01 13:17 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-08-01 16:11 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-01 14:00 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-02 10:40 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-01 16:20 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-22 08:24 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:26 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 05:39 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-01 13:51 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-02 10:38 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-01 16:14 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-02 01:15 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-01 16:24 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-02 02:32 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:57 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-01 22:23 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 01:21 -0500
                Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-02 19:21 +0200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 14:05 -0500
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 01:24 -0500
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-01 23:56 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-08-09 14:25 +0000
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-30 14:19 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-29 19:53 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-29 23:45 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-30 04:22 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-30 13:13 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-30 13:27 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-30 13:57 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-30 14:11 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-30 14:39 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-30 15:05 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-30 14:03 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-30 11:22 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-29 18:32 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-30 14:38 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-07-30 10:56 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-30 22:28 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-30 10:57 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-08-03 08:02 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-03 08:33 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-08-03 20:50 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-08-04 04:52 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-04 06:08 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:20 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-04 06:45 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-09-05 12:15 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-03 19:09 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-08-04 06:09 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:40 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-09-05 13:24 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-09-05 21:51 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-09-05 17:16 -0400
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-09-05 19:59 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-09-06 07:51 +0100
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-09-06 17:32 -0700
            Re: SQL filesortcc question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-25 10:04 -0700
        Re: SQL filesortcc question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-07-21 13:23 +0200
          Re: SQL filesortcc question raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-07-22 15:14 +0000
          Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 15:25 -0700
            Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-26 11:31 +1200
              Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 17:10 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-26 13:29 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 23:51 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-26 20:24 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-26 03:02 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-27 09:22 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-26 15:04 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-27 10:32 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-26 16:49 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-27 21:46 +1200
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-27 04:53 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-26 14:58 -0700
                Re: SQL filesortcc question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-26 15:15 -0700
      Re: SQL filesortcc question doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2015-07-16 19:47 +0000
  Re: SQL filesortcc question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-16 09:55 +1200

csiph-web