Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #413138

Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic

Newsgroups sci.math
Date 2018-05-15 13:50 -0700
References (6 earlier) <pd82mv$656$1@news.muc.de> <59359449-8767-4235-90ae-184881394e91@googlegroups.com> <pdch8h$t87$1@news.muc.de> <8ed48cac-6165-478d-83e9-c3df88d1e5bb@googlegroups.com> <pdfbs0$2oat$1@news.muc.de>
Message-ID <821cdd90-e7fe-4402-bb43-0a36d2c3eeaa@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic
From "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 12:19:34 PM UTC-7, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> 
> >> I've skimmed the article in the English wikipedia on Constructivism.
> >> I don't find it, as yet, an attractive philosophy.  
> 
> 
> > The basic idea behind constructivism is that the logic and reasoning
> > used by the constructivists is much closer to the reasoning used in
> > science and technology than the logic used in classical pure
> > mathematics.
> 
> OK.  That doesn't make me like it, though.
> 
> > In particular, the reasoning used in science and technology would never
> > lead to the conclusion that there exists a super-infinite universe
> > lying beyond the potentially infinite universe that science and
> > technology deals with.
> 
> That's a self-referential statement that appears more meaningful than it
> is.  It says "science ... would never ... beyond the potentially infinite
> univers dealt with by science".  In fact it says nothing.
> 
> The Super-infinite universe is the subject of earnest scientific
> research: it goes by the name "Multiverse".  Who knows, maybe the
> topology of this postulated multiverse is modelled by the familiar
> transfinite numbers somehow.
> 
> -- 
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

Many these days are putting down the Multiple Worlds Interpretation 
because they'd all be in one again and that's just the one (eg that 
the Pauli versus Schroedinger or rather Heisenberg find that the 
objects do have their position and momentum, that measurement is 
in effect as the measurement or observer effect, rather mechanically 
or as courtesy energy and configuration of experiment).

That the universe contains itself or for example that the universe 
of physical objects (eg, particles, waves, fields, or voids) as 
mathematical objects sees that the universe is infinite and full 
of those has also that it's an example of "Cantor's paradox" or 
that it's its own powerset and contains itself.

So, the "trans-finite" is in a sense only as familiar as the 
polynomial or power series, and, there's quite all the rest 
of the "infinite" that the trans-finite is only a tiny part.

Let's keep in mind that physics as science today and theory 
has conservation and symmetry as utmost principle.

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 11:20 -0700
  Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2018-05-11 19:33 +0000
    Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:16 -0700
      Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 16:48 -0700
      Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 18:31 -0700
        Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 18:46 -0700
          Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 18:49 -0700
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-12 00:59 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 02:20 -0700
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:43 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 14:09 -0700
        Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:40 -0700
          Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2018-05-12 20:48 +0000
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 14:50 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2018-05-13 01:00 +0000
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:10 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2018-05-14 17:33 +0000
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 21:09 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2018-05-15 19:19 +0000
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 13:50 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic "Shobe, Martin" <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-15 21:34 -0500
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic FredJeffries <fredjeffries@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 09:10 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic FredJeffries <fredjeffries@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 09:15 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-15 05:33 -0700
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2018-05-12 19:02 -0400
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-13 01:38 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 21:40 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2018-05-15 05:22 -0400
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-13 01:31 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-13 03:51 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-13 05:18 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-13 06:59 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2018-05-13 11:02 +0000
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-13 05:37 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2018-05-13 21:57 +0100
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-14 04:44 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2018-05-14 13:29 +0100
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-14 07:42 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-14 09:36 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-14 09:42 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2018-05-14 18:29 +0100
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-14 12:03 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-14 12:06 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-14 12:10 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 13:44 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2018-05-14 18:16 +0100
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-15 05:44 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-14 06:38 -0700
          Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 17:58 -0700
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 18:04 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 18:19 -0700
      Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic FredJeffries <fredjeffries@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 09:14 -0700
        Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 10:07 -0700
          Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic FredJeffries <fredjeffries@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 09:26 -0700
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:18 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic FredJeffries <fredjeffries@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:26 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-16 14:06 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-16 15:53 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2018-05-16 19:07 -0400
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 01:17 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2018-05-17 09:42 -0400
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:40 -0700
        Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-15 11:06 -0700
    Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-12 01:05 -0700
    Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic David Petry <davidlpetry@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:57 -0700
      Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2018-05-13 00:20 +0000
  Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic "Shobe, Martin" <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-11 20:03 -0500
    Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-12 00:59 -0700
    Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-05-12 01:59 -0700
      Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 02:55 -0700
        Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 03:04 -0700
        Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-05-12 03:06 -0700
          Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 03:09 -0700
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 03:13 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-05-12 03:20 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 03:28 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 03:24 -0700
  Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-12 01:14 -0700
    Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-13 09:07 -0700
      Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-13 11:08 -0700
        Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-13 12:05 -0700
          Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-13 12:53 -0700
      Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-15 11:02 -0700
        Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-05-15 21:13 +0200
          Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-16 11:30 -0700
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zeit Geist <Tucsondrew@me.com> - 2018-05-16 12:23 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-16 14:00 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zeit Geist <Tucsondrew@me.com> - 2018-05-16 16:18 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-16 16:27 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-17 05:01 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 08:34 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-17 09:34 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 10:12 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-17 10:57 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 11:56 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 12:00 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-17 12:29 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 13:38 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-18 08:12 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 12:23 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-19 04:53 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-19 07:21 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-19 09:11 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-20 03:20 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-20 04:48 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-20 05:19 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-20 10:09 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-20 13:26 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-20 18:10 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-21 06:05 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-21 07:24 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-21 08:59 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-21 11:48 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-22 05:45 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-05-22 14:51 +0200
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-22 06:31 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-22 13:26 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-22 14:22 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-23 06:06 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-23 07:19 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-23 11:56 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-23 12:08 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-23 13:22 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-23 18:11 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-24 02:47 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 06:00 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-24 07:43 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 08:10 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-24 09:37 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 09:45 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-25 09:05 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 11:09 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-25 15:26 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 23:14 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 03:23 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-26 06:37 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 06:50 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 07:30 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-26 08:39 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 09:15 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-27 05:37 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-27 08:58 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-28 03:53 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 05:04 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-28 05:10 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 05:19 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-29 04:53 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-29 06:22 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-29 06:36 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-29 07:12 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-29 08:35 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-29 08:52 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-30 04:25 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 04:50 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-31 06:17 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-31 07:05 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-31 09:53 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-31 11:47 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-06-01 03:58 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-06-01 05:07 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-06-01 05:24 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-06-01 06:27 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 10:21 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:04 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 16:27 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-06-02 07:23 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 00:11 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:12 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-23 12:49 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-23 12:51 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-23 13:24 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 02:09 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2018-05-22 19:09 +0100
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-22 13:29 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 22:32 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-24 03:57 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 04:48 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-24 07:29 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-05-24 16:39 +0200
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-05-18 01:19 +0200
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-18 08:14 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-05-18 17:31 +0200
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-18 10:09 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic FredJeffries <fredjeffries@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 10:53 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 13:54 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 13:55 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 14:09 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 14:19 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 14:23 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 14:37 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zeit Geist <Tucsondrew@me.com> - 2018-05-18 14:33 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-19 04:58 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-19 05:28 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-19 05:34 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-19 05:36 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-19 05:46 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zeit Geist <Tucsondrew@me.com> - 2018-05-19 09:00 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-20 03:21 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-05-19 02:01 +0200
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2018-05-21 16:40 +0100
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-21 09:06 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-21 13:52 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-22 05:45 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-22 08:27 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-22 13:29 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-22 13:43 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-22 13:52 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-23 06:06 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zeit Geist <Tucsondrew@me.com> - 2018-05-22 17:30 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-23 06:06 -0700
        Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-15 17:14 -0700
          Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-16 11:26 -0700
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic wpihughes@gmail.com - 2018-05-16 16:35 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-17 05:03 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 05:33 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-17 09:31 -0700
  Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 12:40 -0500
  Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 22:36 -0700
    Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-14 04:49 -0700
      Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 01:34 -0700
        Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2018-05-17 05:08 -0700
          Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 10:03 -0700
            Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 10:06 -0700
              Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 10:19 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 10:26 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 10:30 -0700
                Re: The fundamental theorem of set theory is problematic FredJeffries <fredjeffries@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 12:29 -0700

csiph-web