Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #180430
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac |
| Subject | Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? |
| Organization | Southern Nevada Institute of Technology |
| References | <m1dso8F1e0qU1@mid.individual.net> <m1hrelFjft2U2@mid.individual.net> <XnsB28E498F1958HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> <m1v276Fjpc3U3@mid.individual.net> |
| Date | 2025-02-22 23:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <67ba5900$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Feb 22, 2025 at 3:42:44 PM MST, "David" wrote <m1v276Fjpc3U3@mid.individual.net>: > On 22/02/2025 05:27, Gremlin wrote: >> David <BD@invalid.email> news:m1hrelFjft2U2@mid.individual.net Mon, 17 Feb >> 2025 22:27:33 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >> >>> Malware *CAN* reside in places other than the main hard drive. Here are >>> a few examples: >> >> I'm sure he's well aware of the methods you shared. You actually duplicated >> atleast one...You did this because you don't actually understand things >> concerning these machines on a technical level. For you, some of what can be >> done with them appears to be black magic or something. At some point, you >> assumed that some malware cannot be removed; once you have it, you have it >> it's a done deal. That's not actually true, and I've tried to explain this >> to you several times. You ignore me though and continue on with it. It is >> somewhat annoying, but, I've learned to look over it. >> >>> 1. **USB Drives and External Storage**: Malware can infect USB drives, >>> external hard drives, and SD cards. When these devices are plugged into >>> a computer, the malware can execute or copy itself onto the system. >> >> Via auto run exploits if inserted into a windows based rig, otherwise >> firmware modification; but again, it'll be OS specific. And with Linux, it >> could even be distro specific. IE: works fine on say Linux Mint, but won't >> work on MXLinux. They're based on different bases and this does sometimes >> cause issues. >> >>> 2. **Firmware**: Some sophisticated malware targets the firmware of >>> devices like the BIOS or UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface). >>> It can persist through reboots and even OS reinstalls, making it harder >>> to remove. >> >> It doesn't have to be sophisticated to go that route, but, most of the time >> when they do firmware exploits, it's pretty advanced code with several >> payloads. That's been my experience anyway. >> >>> 3. **Network Devices**: Certain malware can be embedded in devices like >>> routers, network-attached storage (NAS) devices, or printers. These >>> devices may have weak security and can serve as entry points for the >>> malware to infect connected computers. >> >> This is one place where you duplicated yourself. It's firmware, bro. Instead >> of doing a copy/paste, why don't you actually read the material and do what >> we were taught to do as children? Acquire more details; research the matter >> so that you have a solid understanding of what's being discussed. We used >> to use actual books for that, but the internet made that task much easier. >> You still have to actually do it tho. :) >> >>> 4. **RAM**: Some malware operates purely in the system's memory (RAM), >>> leaving no trace on the hard drive. This type of malware is often more >>> challenging to detect, as it can vanish after a reboot. >> >> It still has to be loaded from a solid point to get into the RAM. And while >> it's in solid form, if you don't use the host OS, you can hunt it down. All >> Malware technically resides in RAM anyhow, they're programs like any other. >> They just do things that they shouldn't be doing. But, at the end of the day >> they are still programs, and can be treated the same as any other program. >> >> It's not possible to make truely undetectable malware David, is the point, >> i'm trying to make here. It's quite possible to make it very difficult and >> not possible with certain tools; but as I'm sure you understand, there's >> more than one kind of tool. >> >>> 5. **Cloud Storage or Network Shares**: Malware can infect cloud storage >>> services or network shares. Once a device accesses these locations, it >>> may download or spread the infection to other systems. >> >> That's a software issue. It's nothing new, and, I'd be hesitant to call that >> an actual method. >> >>> 6. **Bootable Media**: In some cases, malware can reside on bootable >>> media, such as CDs, DVDs, or even within boot sector code, and can >>> execute before the operating system even loads. >> >> I'm well aware. It was one of the keypoints I raised with snit when he tried >> his creative routine concerning some of what I wrote about a floppy hanging >> a machine during boot if the bootsector didn't have pass along to HD based >> os and transfer control. He conveniently leaves out my followup to my own >> post where I got specific and asked why he'd allow the machine to even >> attempt a floppy boot. Initially he claimed he was in charge of those >> machines, but!, the moment I asked why he'd do that, he was quick to change >> his tune and reverse course that he wasn't really in charge of them. >> >> A boot sector virus is a bit of a pain to write too, because you are very >> limited on available physical space. If you're a complex critter, you have >> to store the bulk of your code somewhere else, and load it later on. Or, >> reconfigure the host to do that for you. You can just remain a tiny boot >> sector virus and spread your code into other sectors that weren't in use, >> but to protect your code, you went ahead and marked them as being in use so >> the host OS wouldn't go and trash you when someone saved or created a file, >> or did anything else to increase the space consumed. Even a swap file >> adjustment could wreck your code and screw you good. code wise. >> >>> These types of malware often require different approaches to detection >>> and removal since traditional antivirus tools mainly focus on scanning >>> hard drives. >> >> This article you copy and pasted the contents from has issues, David. And >> it's flatout wrong concerning the limitations of AV or what they spend the >> bulk of their time scanning. Scanning for physical copies of malware is only >> a section of their code. In order to properly write a self replicating >> program that wasn't going to be tagged right off, you had to know how your >> adversaries worked; I'm far from the only Vxer at the time who reverse >> engineered the 'enemies' software. They do it to each other too, btw, they >> just don't come outright and say that because it's a total violation of >> various licensing agreements and they could actually be sued over it. >> >> AV companies do reverse engineer all software they encounter; malware and >> legit software alike. They make no distinction other than to do a writeup on >> the Malware and remain silent on what they learned from reverse engineering >> their competitors. Multiple companies reverse engineered my BugHunter >> program too; It's one of the reasons (the most important one imho) I wasn't >> worried about people thinking it had a logic bomb or micky. If it did, I'd >> have been exposed by all of the major players and destroy any chance I had >> of redeeming myself and earning the respect as one of the mostly good guys. >> I tried to explain this to Snit before, but, snit being snit wouldn't hear a >> fucking word of it. As you and I both know, even if you choose not to admit >> it in public, He's not a peer of mine and likely won't ever be. And, this >> pisses him the fuck off. I'm not the only one who's tech savvy that he's >> created a problem with. He does it in every technical newsgroup he joins. He >> singles people like me out. He wants to be seen as a peer on the technical >> fronts. >> >> And, I'm sure he's here because of you. Infact, the initial interaction he >> had with me concerning 3D printing tech gave it away. Do you remember that? >> He shared a url to a website that specialized in 3D printers and asked if I >> could determine what kind of printer tech they were using. They openly >> shared that information on the home page; I simply pointed that out to him, >> everybody who visited the site could see the same information as I was >> viewing. He was trying to talk down to me and do his thing. It didn't work >> out for him. >> >> He's all about trying to bring up an 'ego' these days, doesn't want to >> discuss points by point basis, just wants to use chatgpt and troll. He's >> always been a troll mind you, but, he's not even trying to hide it these >> days. Still lies his fucking ass off, and still tries to project his known >> reading comprehension issues on me. He can't make the sale though, ffs, he >> just pulls things entirely from his asshole. >> >> I think? I understand why you associate with him, but, David, he's not the >> one who's going to bring me down. Once again, you've selected someone to >> help you out that can't stand toe to toe with me. He never could. If you'll >> recall, when the can we help him with his computer discussion started; I >> asked him some questions about it when it was running, and then I shared my >> initial diagnosis; that I don't think we have a mainboard problem, I think >> we're looking at a bad hard drive. If you'll recall, SC did not initially >> agree with my assesment. Which is understandable; he didn't know that I'm >> actually a multi cert comp technician who's built and serviced tens of >> thousands of machines during the course of my career. >> >> I wasn't asking Snit those questions randomly, and I didn't take a shot in >> the dark guess on my diagnosis for the rig, I was going by decades of hands >> on experience; actually working on them for a living. Not doing it on the >> side from my house. I've done that too, on my off days, but I have an actual >> lab here to do that stuff with. It's basically a duplicate of everything I >> was able to access at the shop I worked for. My former employer insisted I >> do this due to my health; some days I just couldn't go in and stay all day, >> but I could swing by and pickup a few machines to work on, to lighten the >> shops load. >> >> Back then you really needed multiple computers to assist you with repairs. >> That's especially true today. You could get buy using the only PC you had if >> you were in a bind, but, it's much more efficient to have multiple machines >> available to you. You can assign tasks more efficiently that way. Especially >> with data recovery efforts, that can take hours to days and the machine >> doing the task is tied up, focused entirely on that single project. It's not >> wise to try and use said machine while it's in the middle of data recovery. >> you may not get a 2nd chance to pull data if it's interrupted. >> >> And, as you well know, my diagnosis was confirmed as being accurate, despite >> Snits efforts to stall and take his sweet time, deliberately ignoring my >> specific instructions and taking 'help' from anyone who posted. That >> actually makes troubleshooting remotely a bit of a pain. Time is wasted, and >> it only adds to possible confusion for him. I tried to explain this to you >> and SC; but you guys refused to just lemme do my thing. I'd have had that >> confirmed diagnosis a lot sooner if you guys had remained on the sidelines. >> I understand, you were both trying to help; but when you're actually serious >> about the trade, you don't do that. >> >> It's too many chiefs and too few indians then, you understand? I'm not >> trying to insult either of you, btw, I'm just reminding you of things. The >> two of you were basically, I think without even realizing it, helping Snit >> try to make me look incompetent. That was the actual reason he agreed to let >> me try and diagnose his machine via usenet; He didn't think I'd actually be >> able to. He thought I was BSing, just as he thought I wasn't actually Raid >> for a long time. Until well, enough proof was posted that he couldn't >> continue making that claim. It just wasn't working out. Now he's trying to >> sell the story that he never did that. Now he's trying to say I accused him >> of not posting as Raid or some completely unrelated bullshit; that wasn't >> what I accused him of. And you know that. I was rightfully accusing him of >> lieing and spinning things around. Which publically agree or not, you know >> damn well that's part of what he does here. >> >> I do understand why SC disagreed with my initial diagnosis; that's where >> hands on experience comes into play, in my favor in this case. I've never >> been what you call a hobbyist level computer user. My experience isn't >> limited to fixing friends and family computers as time allowed. I actually >> did it, every day, for a living. I didn't even spend a solid hour doing my >> CompTIA testing, David. I was high at the time and I fucked around; but I >> still passed with 95% average. Had I actually dedicated myself to it, I'd >> have 0wned it outright. I'm not a hobbyist repair person friends and family >> call; I have considerably more hands on experience from repairing hardware >> to software. FFS, I've rebuilt a corrupted windows registry hive by hand >> using a hex editor and writing little tools with ASIC to patch bytes. It >> took me 3 fucking hours, but I did it. Why didn't I just reload it? Well, >> that machine ran a plasma cutter that used proprietary as fuck software with >> a dongle and he had no way to reinstall it; lost the cdrom a long time ago. >> And despite my efforts to find a suitable copy online that would >> specifically run that hardware; It was deuces. So, if I couldn't keep the >> software in working condition, there was no point in going any further with >> the rig. It would either be able to run that huge plasma cutter or it >> wouldn't. And if it didn't, we didn't get paid for the job. Boss didn't like >> non paying jobs very much. It was in my best interest to repair whatever >> machine came onto my bench. >> >> I didn't always have the luxury of rename windows directories and reload, or >> wipe and reload. Sometimes, the machine had very specific software that >> required you actually be a real Technician because you'd be doing what had >> to be done to restore the OS and software, without reloading; because as I >> wrote above, that wasn't an option. I've always hated that 'fix' methodology >> too, because if you really know what the fuck you're doing, you should not >> have to resort to a clean reload. Anybody can wipe and reload a box, you do >> it all the fucking time. >> >> SC probably thought I was getting ahead of myself. But, again, I remind you >> I asked snit specific questions about the machines behavior and they weren't >> random ones. I was getting a feel for the status, mostly due to the way in >> which he described it began to fail on him. My decades of fixing these >> fucking things for a living is what lead me to that diagnosis. You have to >> understand, I've been repairing these rigs since before I was even a >> teenager; that's how I made money as a kid going to school. I didn't grow up, >> become an adult, and then decide 'hey I wanna work on computers and >> electronics' I was *already doing that* and had been since I was literally, >> a little kid. >> >> Snit will come along and accuse me of having a huge ego here, I've little >> doubt. But, I'm sure you know this has fuckall to do with any ego on my part. >> I'm simply being blunt candid and honest. There's no ego here, I have >> nothing to prove.. My own known history did that for me. You read what >> chatgpt actually knows about me, you've even shared some of it's information >> on me here. I'm not an ego driven maniac that snits working so hard to paint >> me out as; when he could be more productive and work for a living. >> >> If I was, you wouldn't have interacted with me beyond the first couple of >> emails between us. Snit's just using that as his latest bullshit excuse for >> his inability to keep up with me. A situation he put himself in, too, btw. I >> wasn't trying to 'compete' with him or anyone else here. I respect (greatly) >> two of the posters especially, and you know them both. And you know why I >> hold them in such high regard too. >> >> They are, 100%, peers of mine. We're on the same level for the most part. >> Perhaps some skillset differences due to personal interest differences, but >> at the end of the day, they're just as competent as I am. I do not question >> the advice they provide others here when they choose to do so; I'm sure >> you've noticed that. I'm also sure you've noticed that when either of them >> or both disagrees with me, I still remain respectful (er for the most part >> anyhow. I do have a sailors mouth, after all. And, I really am the same way >> irl as I am here online. There is no persona, it's just me) I don't try to >> dog either of them. We can have arguments, etc, and, still not take it >> personal. As an actual peer would. >> >> Sorry for the long response, but, I don't have the free time I once had to >> fiddle fart and fuck around. So I tend to condense things. Hopefully you're >> okay with this and we can have reasonable adult conversations. > > HOW would you like me to respond to this, Dustin? With anger, hatred, blame against me... and adoration toward him. In short you need to join into his delusions. -- Specialist in unnecessary details and overcomplicated solutions.
Back to uk.comp.sys.mac | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 10:25 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-02-16 06:34 -0500
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 13:45 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 06:46 -0700
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-02-16 10:37 -0500
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 17:26 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-02-16 14:55 -0500
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 20:44 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 20:46 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 20:55 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:07 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 21:16 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:17 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 21:26 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 22:08 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 23:34 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 23:38 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 23:54 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 00:21 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-17 01:26 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 01:45 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-17 01:26 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 01:45 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-17 04:41 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 05:22 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-22 05:27 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 05:53 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 15:33 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 17:17 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 18:00 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 18:17 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 18:22 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 18:59 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 19:19 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 19:36 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 19:52 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 20:49 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 20:56 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 21:20 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:23 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 23:45 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 23:52 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 23:58 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 00:18 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 12:34 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 14:11 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 14:21 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 07:37 -0700
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 16:47 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 16:11 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 16:44 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 16:51 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2025-02-17 00:26 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-03-08 08:48 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-17 01:26 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 01:41 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-17 04:41 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 05:25 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 05:42 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-22 05:27 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 05:43 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-02-16 14:57 -0500
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 20:51 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 21:13 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:19 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 23:25 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 23:38 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> - 2025-02-16 16:19 -0600
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-16 23:49 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> - 2025-02-17 15:58 -0600
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <BD@invalid.email> - 2025-02-17 22:27 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2025-02-17 15:08 -0800
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-02-19 23:10 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David@home.today> - 2025-02-19 23:29 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-22 05:27 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 05:50 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David@home.today> - 2025-02-22 22:36 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 15:42 -0700
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 22:42 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David@home.today> - 2025-02-23 00:03 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 02:22 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-03-08 08:52 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-03-08 14:16 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-03-08 22:33 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-03-08 23:19 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-22 05:27 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 05:39 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 23:30 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 17:11 -0700
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 00:18 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 17:25 -0700
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 00:58 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 18:51 -0700
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 01:55 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 19:01 -0700
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 02:41 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-22 05:27 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 05:38 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David@home.today> - 2025-02-22 22:42 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 23:08 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-22 05:27 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 05:46 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-17 01:26 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 01:43 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-17 15:07 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-22 05:27 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-17 01:26 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 01:45 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-17 04:41 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 05:21 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-02-22 05:27 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 05:54 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 08:45 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-02-26 10:28 +0100
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-03-04 10:11 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-02-26 04:52 -0500
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 12:46 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-02-26 08:04 -0500
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 13:57 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 14:01 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-02-26 09:47 -0500
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-02-26 09:49 -0500
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 15:24 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 15:05 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 16:08 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 16:42 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 16:51 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 16:56 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 17:11 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 17:30 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 19:36 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 19:57 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-02-26 08:35 +0100
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 08:36 +0000
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-02-26 11:41 +0100
Re: So ...... is this real, or imagined? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 14:02 +0000
Ping: Apd David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 22:44 +0000
Ping: Apd David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-02-26 22:46 +0000
csiph-web