Re: clock rate

Message-ID	<57B9E7A0.288@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2016-08-21 10:40 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: clock rate
References	(12 earlier) <72172f5e-8726-4621-9d70-127a1b40db92@googlegroups.com> <np9en5$ufg$2@dont-email.me> <8d63ce51-ec69-49f5-99fd-0c3578de7114@googlegroups.com> <npbia2$2so$1@dont-email.me> <2ce07234-260d-4d88-a5d9-092c9b3e0b02@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

xxein1@att.net wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 2:39:01 AM UTC-4, Poutnik Fornntp wrote:
> > Dne 21/08/2016 v 01:19 xxein1@att.net napsal(a):
> > >>
> > > xxein:  OK.  Have it your way.  What does GR predict for this case?  How is it justified?  Until you answer, you are either lazy or unable to do it,
> > > you make an unjustified claim before that.
> > >
> > > "I station a clock a few meters above the ground.  From somewhere above, I drop an identical clock so that it passes by the stationary clock.  At the instant it passes, as a matter of principle, which clock will have the faster time rate?"
> > >
> > > Did I answer my own question incorrectly?  Did I answer my own question?  Did anyone else (pun) answer my question?  Does anyone know how to answer the question?  Did anyone ask how to answer the question?  Is it beneath one's dignity to answer the question?  Is the answer contained in MTW pp 476 eqns 405-434 - inhomogeneous polymorphic class2 rotational matrices?
> > >
> > > What does GR say about it?  Does GR assume something not in evidence?  Is GR lacking evidence?  Is it beyond the limits of GR?  Why or why not?
> > >
> > > Am I the only one able to calculate it and answer the question?  Can anyone prove me wrong.  You can't because you don't know what 'right' is.
> > >
> > > Where is Hillman, Gibbs, Baez, or Roberts?  What do they have to say about this?  Would they know or just think they know?
> > >
> > > Who can one rely upon for this matter?  Who can analyze all the aspects of this and be confident with an answer?  It doesn't cost anything to try.
> > >
> >
> > You can get the professional quality answers easier,
> > if reposted in a cooperative style.
> >
> > Not in confrontation and demanding style,
> > that does not really search for the answer,
> > but just for confirmation of your a priori idea.
> >
> > Searching for confirmation,
> > you evade scientific methods that could violate it.
> >
> > --
> > Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
> > Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
> 
> xxein:  OK.
> 
> I station a clock a few meters above the ground.  From somewhere above, I drop an identical clock so that it passes by the stationary clock.  At the instant it passes, as a matter of principle, which clock will have the faster time rate?


sounds like an engeneering problem, not a pysics problem.

Thread

clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-18 16:08 -0700
  Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-18 18:48 -0500
    Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-18 19:15 -0700
      Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-19 08:23 -0500
        Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 11:34 -0700
          Re: clock rate "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 11:39 -0700
            Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 13:11 -0700
              Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 20:40 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 07:08 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 23:29 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 08:48 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 02:10 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 11:29 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 02:48 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:16 +0200
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:25 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 16:19 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-21 00:39 -0500
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 07:52 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 07:52 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 07:55 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:07 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 09:28 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 18:50 +0200
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 10:23 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:31 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 11:41 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 08:38 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:01 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:11 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 10:19 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 19:29 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:43 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 10:40 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:47 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 08:49 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:34 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 09:58 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:42 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 08:53 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 02:46 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:20 +0200
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-21 09:13 -0500
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:56 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-21 12:29 -0500
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:37 -0700
              Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-20 15:08 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 15:42 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 10:20 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:28 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 11:44 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:56 -0700
                Re: clock rate "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 13:09 -0700
                Re: clock rate "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-21 13:43 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 13:57 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 15:07 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 17:05 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-22 11:48 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-22 13:58 -0500
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-22 17:26 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-23 05:00 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-23 08:42 -0500
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-23 09:00 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-24 14:43 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-25 10:22 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-25 11:31 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-25 12:11 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-25 17:31 -0500
              Re: clock rate "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 03:11 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:47 -0700
  Re: clock rate Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-19 12:41 +1000
    Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-18 22:27 -0700
      Re: clock rate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 07:47 -0500
        Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 11:21 -0700
      Re: clock rate Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-20 16:10 +1000
        Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 01:34 -0700
  Re: clock rate Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-08-19 07:47 +0200
  Re: clock rate Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 10:16 -0700
    Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:02 -0700

csiph-web