Re: clock rate

Message-ID	<57B9E2C5.3CFA@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2016-08-21 10:20 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: clock rate
References	(4 earlier) <0c5a50ac-3802-45b1-b832-447d8e49ff58@googlegroups.com> <37139726-ab06-4f5e-ba67-97a2da657e8d@googlegroups.com> <2646195c-06b1-4df5-aed8-d89b90391ada@googlegroups.com> <57B8D4C1.4D25@ix.netcom.com> <a331db0e-7157-4ac6-b0b5-aea95d9ba3ec@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

xxein1@att.net wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, August 20, 2016 at 6:06:53 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > xxein1@att.net wrote:
> > >
> 
> >
> >
> > Everyone knows...you're the better model, xx(ein)Stein.
> >
> >
> > If the two clocks are falling towards the earth...at the sametime..the earth is falling up at the sametime towards the clock. Did you figure that in?
> 
> xxein:  I know of that but that is not the scenario I posed.  Does that enable you to answer my simple question?
> 
> "I station a clock a few meters above the ground.  From somewhere above, I drop an identical clock so that it passes by the stationary clock.  At the instant it passes, as a matter of principle, which clock will have the faster time rate?"  And assume a non-rotating Earth.  And for more simplicity - an isolated Earth.



what would happen if you performed the expirement on the moon?



the fastest time rate would be the clock above because it started
already in the future.


relativity has nothing to do with accelration...so it doesn't matter.

Thread

clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-18 16:08 -0700
  Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-18 18:48 -0500
    Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-18 19:15 -0700
      Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-19 08:23 -0500
        Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 11:34 -0700
          Re: clock rate "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 11:39 -0700
            Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 13:11 -0700
              Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 20:40 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 07:08 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 23:29 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 08:48 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 02:10 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 11:29 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 02:48 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:16 +0200
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:25 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 16:19 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-21 00:39 -0500
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 07:52 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 07:52 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 07:55 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:07 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 09:28 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 18:50 +0200
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 10:23 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:31 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 11:41 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 08:38 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:01 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:11 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 10:19 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 19:29 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:43 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 10:40 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:47 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 08:49 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:34 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 09:58 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:42 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 08:53 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 02:46 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:20 +0200
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-21 09:13 -0500
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:56 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-21 12:29 -0500
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:37 -0700
              Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-20 15:08 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 15:42 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 10:20 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:28 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 11:44 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:56 -0700
                Re: clock rate "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 13:09 -0700
                Re: clock rate "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-21 13:43 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 13:57 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 15:07 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 17:05 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-22 11:48 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-22 13:58 -0500
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-22 17:26 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-23 05:00 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-23 08:42 -0500
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-23 09:00 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-24 14:43 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-25 10:22 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-25 11:31 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-25 12:11 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-25 17:31 -0500
              Re: clock rate "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 03:11 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:47 -0700
  Re: clock rate Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-19 12:41 +1000
    Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-18 22:27 -0700
      Re: clock rate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 07:47 -0500
        Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 11:21 -0700
      Re: clock rate Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-20 16:10 +1000
        Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 01:34 -0700
  Re: clock rate Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-08-19 07:47 +0200
  Re: clock rate Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 10:16 -0700
    Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:02 -0700

csiph-web