Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #416135
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Speed of light |
| Date | 2017-04-13 15:43 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <4057423.71ecxZkqEx@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <3063977a-339e-4855-a36f-281d213b7535@googlegroups.com> <3609208.WqxBL6FxY0@PointedEars.de> <36de15e7-9b94-452c-937f-47a3aedd80a8@googlegroups.com> <4193340.xy7EcECd8a@PointedEars.de> <fa70a593-7366-4f91-ac57-576688a112f5@googlegroups.com> |
mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 15:20:05 UTC+2 użytkownik Thomas > 'PointedEars' Lahn napisał: >> mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote: >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Your real name belongs there. >> >> > W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 14:41:23 UTC+2 użytkownik Thomas >> > 'PointedEars' Lahn napisał: >> >> Which part of “attribution line” did you not understand? > > Command some glowing worms, will you? That is not a response to my notice, and not an answer to my question. >> >> mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote: >> >> > And pears are growing on a willow. The willow >> >> > is defined this way - I can write this definition >> >> > whenever you want, [insult] >> >> You can do that, but by contrast to the SI definition [of the meter] >> >> you will find very few people, if any, agreeing with that, because by >> >> contrast your definition has nothing to do with reality. >> > Unfortunately, you only imagined this contrast:( >> Well, which international standard contains your definition? > > Changing the subject. […] No, the subject is still the same. We are still talking about the validity of definitions. You have claimed that your definition would be on an equal level with the SI definition of the meter. It is now up to you to either substantiate that claim or to retract it, lest you destroy what little credibility you might have left here. (JFYI: Judging from your record, I do not expect that you are going to do either. Further evasion/insults by you will cause EOD for me.) > [insult] You should be ashamed of yourself. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Science School The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Science School The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-09 13:33 -0700
Re: Science School Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2017-04-11 10:10 +0800
Re: Science School Paul Colquhoun <newsposter@andor.dropbear.id.au> - 2017-04-11 17:39 +1000
Re: Science School Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 15:06 +0200
Re: Science School Jolie Osokuro <uuol@oowo.ou> - 2017-04-11 13:32 +0000
Re: Science School Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 15:48 +0200
Re: Science School kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 08:25 -0700
Re: Science School Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-04-11 18:16 +0200
Re: Science School Wendi Maddox <ox@awdodww.oe> - 2017-04-14 14:40 +0000
Speed of light (was: Science School) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 18:21 +0200
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 20:49 +0200
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 12:17 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 22:00 +0200
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 06:34 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 00:36 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 05:29 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 14:41 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:07 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:20 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:25 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:43 +0200
Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:53 -0700
Re: Speed of light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 05:47 -0700
Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:15 +0200
Re: Speed of light moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 16:54 +0000
Re: Speed of light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 10:44 -0700
Re: Speed of light moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 21:33 +0000
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-11 20:22 +0000
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 07:16 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-12 15:49 +0000
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-12 10:04 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 05:22 -0700
Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 16:33 +0000
Re: Science School Nobody <nobody@nowhere.nohow> - 2017-04-11 00:41 -0400
csiph-web