Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #416135

Re: Speed of light

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Speed of light
Date 2017-04-13 15:43 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <4057423.71ecxZkqEx@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <3063977a-339e-4855-a36f-281d213b7535@googlegroups.com> <3609208.WqxBL6FxY0@PointedEars.de> <36de15e7-9b94-452c-937f-47a3aedd80a8@googlegroups.com> <4193340.xy7EcECd8a@PointedEars.de> <fa70a593-7366-4f91-ac57-576688a112f5@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote:

> W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 15:20:05 UTC+2 użytkownik Thomas
> 'PointedEars' Lahn napisał:
>> mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote:
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Your real name belongs there.
>> 
>> > W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 14:41:23 UTC+2 użytkownik Thomas
>> > 'PointedEars' Lahn napisał:
>> 
>> Which part of “attribution line” did you not understand?
> 
> Command some glowing worms, will you?

That is not a response to my notice, and not an answer to my question.

>> >> mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote:
>> >> > And pears are growing on a willow. The willow
>> >> > is defined this way - I can write this definition
>> >> > whenever you want, [insult]
>> >> You can do that, but by contrast to the SI definition [of the meter]
>> >> you will find very few people, if any, agreeing with that, because by
>> >> contrast your definition has nothing to do with reality.
>> > Unfortunately, you only imagined this contrast:(
>> Well, which international standard contains your definition?
> 
> Changing the subject. […]

No, the subject is still the same.  We are still talking about the validity 
of definitions.  You have claimed that your definition would be on an equal 
level with the SI definition of the meter.  It is now up to you to either 
substantiate that claim or to retract it, lest you destroy what little 
credibility you might have left here.

(JFYI: Judging from your record, I do not expect that you are going to do 
either.  Further evasion/insults by you will cause EOD for me.)

> [insult]

You should be ashamed of yourself.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Science School The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-09 13:03 -0700
  Re: Science School The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-09 13:33 -0700
  Re: Science School Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2017-04-11 10:10 +0800
    Re: Science School Paul Colquhoun <newsposter@andor.dropbear.id.au> - 2017-04-11 17:39 +1000
    Re: Science School Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 15:06 +0200
      Re: Science School Jolie Osokuro <uuol@oowo.ou> - 2017-04-11 13:32 +0000
        Re: Science School Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 15:48 +0200
      Re: Science School kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 08:25 -0700
        Re: Science School Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-04-11 18:16 +0200
          Re: Science School Wendi Maddox <ox@awdodww.oe> - 2017-04-14 14:40 +0000
        Speed of light (was: Science School) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 18:21 +0200
          Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
            Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 20:49 +0200
              Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 12:17 -0700
                Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 22:00 +0200
              Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 06:34 -0700
                Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 00:36 +0200
                Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 05:29 -0700
                Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 14:41 +0200
                Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:07 -0700
                Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:20 +0200
                Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:25 -0700
                Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:43 +0200
                Re: Speed of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 06:53 -0700
                Re: Speed of light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 05:47 -0700
                Re: Speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-13 15:15 +0200
                Re: Speed of light moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 16:54 +0000
                Re: Speed of light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 10:44 -0700
                Re: Speed of light moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 21:33 +0000
            Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-11 20:22 +0000
              Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 07:16 -0700
                Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-12 15:49 +0000
                Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-12 10:04 -0700
                Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 05:22 -0700
                Re: Speed of light (was: Science School) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 16:33 +0000
  Re: Science School Nobody <nobody@nowhere.nohow> - 2017-04-11 00:41 -0400

csiph-web