Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash

From	anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash
Date	2016-08-04 08:21 +0000
Organization	Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID	<2016Aug4.102135@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <9f31d956-c03c-4f0c-9333-179c9ffc1056@googlegroups.com> <2016Aug2.172855@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <bomdnajyMrI0ej3KnZ2dnUU78TednZ2d@supernews.com> <2016Aug3.093228@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <pb-dnTfT8MOOvD_KnZ2dnUU78UPNnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>> Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>>>Can you expand on this?  I don't see what code might throw.
>> 
>> Ctrl-C.  Of course it depends on the quality of implementation whether
>> that becomes an exception or not, but at least in Gforth and
>> SwiftForth, it does.
>
>I don't think it's a QOI issue at all: a standard program is quite
>entitled to assume that code doesn't throw, and doesn't need to defend
>against that possibility.

Which, conversely, means that you think that this behaviour of Gforth
and SwiftForth is non-standard.

I think you are wrong.  The standard has a throw code -28 (user
interrupt), which seems to be designed for that.  And Forth is a
practical language for real-world environments, and users typing
Ctrl-C are a fact in the real world.  What should a system do when the
user types Ctrl-C?

1) Ignore it?  That's certainly not what the user intended.

2) Exit the Forth system without letting the application do any
cleanup (the vfxlin way; does VFX behave the same way on other OSs)?
There is no provision for such behaviour in the standard, and as a
user I find this behaviour not very helpful.  Still, better than
option 1).

3) Return to the Forth command line without letting the application do
any cleanup (iForth-2.1 behaves that way).  There is no provision for
such behaviour in the standard, either.  As a user, I find it better,
but the lack of cleanup is not user-friendly.  There may be
incompletly updated data structures, but if the user is worried about
that, he can just exit the system, so this is better than option 2).

4) THROW a Forth exception so that the application can clean up and/or
handle the Ctrl-C in some other application-defined way.  The
exception -28 in the standard is an indication that this is a standard
behaviour, but a more explicit wording would not hurt.  Option 4 is at
least as useful as the other options in the usual case: Even on
programs that are not designed for asynchronous THROWs, it likely
performs all cleanups designed for synchronous THROWs; it may miss
some, but that's not worse than option 3.  There may also be
incompletely updated data structures, but that's not worse than option
3).

Now, with option 4, we can get even less probablility of missed
cleanup by appropriate coding, and that's what I discussed earlier.

>For the sake of clarity: if you're going to
>talk about such nostandard behaviour you ought to at least flag it as
>such.  That way your audience doesn't have to scratch its collective
>head trying to figure out what you might mean.

I think the audience is well aware that users type Ctrl-C.  In
particular, you should be aware of that because we discussed the issue
earlier, in the thread containing
<2014Jul25.125044@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2016: http://www.euroforth.org/ef16/

Thread

Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:09 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:21 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-21 14:58 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 11:23 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 12:42 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-21 12:40 -1000
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:07 -0700
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-21 19:32 -0500
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:40 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:50 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-21 19:53 -0500
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:58 +0300
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:54 +0300
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 06:48 +0000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 00:19 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-22 02:33 -0500
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:45 +0300
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 19:41 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 20:52 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:22 -0400
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-22 10:49 -0500
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:16 -0400
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:11 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 06:32 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 23:58 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:02 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 17:06 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:11 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-21 15:57 -1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-22 13:25 +1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 20:24 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-07-22 11:32 +0000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 12:49 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 23:10 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:36 -0700
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 20:58 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 21:56 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 23:38 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:43 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:56 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 14:18 -0400
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 08:55 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-25 11:34 +0000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:36 -0400
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2016-07-22 11:15 +0200
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:37 -0400
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 08:56 -1000
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-24 13:16 +1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 12:58 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-25 18:09 +1000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 22:34 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-27 23:08 +1000
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-27 08:58 -1000
                CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-28 09:17 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-29 00:19 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-28 14:54 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 10:00 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-29 21:47 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2016-07-29 15:04 +0200
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-30 18:42 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 15:05 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 02:21 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-31 13:05 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 21:24 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-31 19:07 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-01 06:24 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-01 06:14 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-08-02 10:45 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-02 06:59 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 00:34 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 13:57 +0200
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 06:19 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-02 15:28 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-02 13:34 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-03 07:32 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-03 11:51 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-04 08:21 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-08-04 13:18 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-04 14:02 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-04 12:26 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:24 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:36 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 12:14 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 12:17 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-08-06 13:35 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:20 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-02 13:43 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-28 09:19 -1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 05:15 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-28 21:50 -1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 08:24 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 10:08 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 15:06 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-30 06:22 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 01:07 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 01:30 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 10:17 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 00:51 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 05:20 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 13:06 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 08:13 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 09:09 -1000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 14:08 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 15:24 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 20:12 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 17:36 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 21:54 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 22:03 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 22:00 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:19 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 20:40 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-23 22:23 +1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:48 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 16:04 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 19:31 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 17:20 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 17:54 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 21:27 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 19:18 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 22:25 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 20:39 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 23:32 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 00:30 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 21:36 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 00:46 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-25 09:19 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:35 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:32 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 17:48 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 23:09 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:43 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-23 06:58 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-23 04:02 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 10:43 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-23 10:48 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 10:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 11:24 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-24 03:33 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 08:16 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-25 04:28 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-27 11:59 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 10:44 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 11:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 11:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-27 09:09 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 12:47 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 13:27 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs all2001@spambog.com (Wolfgang Allinger) - 2016-07-27 18:20 -0300
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 19:40 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 19:56 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 00:44 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-27 16:14 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 18:38 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 16:03 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 21:09 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 21:13 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-27 15:25 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 02:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-07-27 09:44 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 13:06 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 12:43 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-25 04:32 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Roelf Toxopeus <rt4all@nothishetnet.nl> - 2016-07-23 14:47 +0200
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 12:24 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 19:47 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 05:33 -0700

csiph-web