Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs

From	Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs
Date	2016-07-21 19:32 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nmrpii$ksl$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<3d8511c7-8cbf-4ef5-bdc3-eb33c5399d42@googlegroups.com> <weSdnZmlaO_A0gzKnZ2dnUU7-fvNnZ2d@supernews.com> <1310374b-be2c-4cd8-ae3e-b9f206c9fe60@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/21/2016 7:07 PM, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 3:40:35 PM UTC-7, Elizabeth D. Rather wrote:
>> On 7/21/16 4:09 AM, Chris Curl wrote:
>>> As you folks may remember, I am implementing my own little Forth.
>>>
>>> I have implemented two flavors of the memory organization, one where
>>> the code and dictionary start at opposite ends of the memory space and
>>> grow towards each other, and one where the dictionary entries are interspersed
>>> with the code.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean by this. Do you mean segregating code and
>> data space, or machine code separate from compiled definitions? The
>> former makes a lot of sense in certain cases (dating back to some early
>> 8086 implementations using segmented registers, an approach that was
>> abandoned when people went to 32-bit implementations). The latter is
>> pretty unusual, and I can't offhand think of a rationale for it.
>>
>> The most common mapping for integrated data space is to have the
>> dictionary in low memory growing towards high memory and the stacks in
>> high memory growing down, with the data stack lower so that it and the
>> dictionary basically share unused memory. If there is a segregated data
>> space, it would be elsewhere, with the dictionary (containing code and
>> high-level definitions) still growing towards high memory. This would
>> include the name space for variables and other data structures that
>> reside in data space.
>>
>>> At this point, I don't have a clear favorite or preference between the two.
>>>
>>> From your perspective, what are the PROs and CONs of the two different
>>> approaches, and which would you tend to gravitate to?
>>>
>>> https://github.com/CCurl/Forth_C
>>
>> An integrated code/data space dictionary is simpler to create and
>> maintain, and results in less implementation code and modestly better
>> compilation performance. The segregated dictionary is necessary when you
>> need to run from ROM/flash, or on segregated code space microcontrollers.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Elizabeth
>
> ANS-Forth failed because it was written by an idiot salesperson who doesn't know even the most rudimentary concepts of assembly-language that any first-year assembly-language programmer would be expected to know. Caches! Ask somebody what they are!
>
> ANS-Forth should have specified that code and data are separate. HERE would only be affected by ALLOT and comma (there are several variations on comma, for different data types). The ANS-Forth document would define exactly which words cause the HERE value to change. What we have now is ambiguity, because the programmer doesn't know if the HERE value changes or not (for example, when CONSTANT is executed) and his programs work on some ANS-Forth systems but not on other ANS-Forth systems. Also, the advantage of separating code and data is faster speed. You never have data in a code-cache line or code in a data cache-line, which is obviously going to slow down the system considerably.
>
> What most likely happened is that some compiler-writers had code and data separated, because they knew that this results in significantly faster execution speed. SwiftForth had code and data intermixed. Everybody wanted to be ANS-Forth compliant, so Elizabeth Rather said either method was fine --- data may or may not be intermixed with code --- nothing was standardized.
>
Besides the speed advantage, as time progresses more of the OSes and CPU 
chips are implementing protection of the code area from data writes, 
it's an option now but its easy to see that in the future  writing to 
the code area will be prohibited so having separate data headers and 
code headers can prevent future issues.

This will be done as a safety issue because so many system hijacking 
malware/viruses is done by buffer overflows which ends up changing the 
software code. That can' happen if code and data are separate, and the 
code area is protected.

-- 
Cecil - k5nwa

Thread

Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:09 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:21 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-21 14:58 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 11:23 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 12:42 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-21 12:40 -1000
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:07 -0700
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-21 19:32 -0500
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:40 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:50 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-21 19:53 -0500
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:58 +0300
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:54 +0300
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 06:48 +0000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 00:19 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-22 02:33 -0500
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:45 +0300
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 19:41 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 20:52 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:22 -0400
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-22 10:49 -0500
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:16 -0400
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:11 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 06:32 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 23:58 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:02 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 17:06 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:11 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-21 15:57 -1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-22 13:25 +1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 20:24 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-07-22 11:32 +0000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 12:49 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 23:10 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:36 -0700
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 20:58 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 21:56 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 23:38 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:43 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:56 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 14:18 -0400
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 08:55 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-25 11:34 +0000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:36 -0400
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2016-07-22 11:15 +0200
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:37 -0400
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 08:56 -1000
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-24 13:16 +1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 12:58 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-25 18:09 +1000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 22:34 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-27 23:08 +1000
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-27 08:58 -1000
                CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-28 09:17 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-29 00:19 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-28 14:54 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 10:00 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-29 21:47 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2016-07-29 15:04 +0200
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-30 18:42 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 15:05 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 02:21 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-31 13:05 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 21:24 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-31 19:07 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-01 06:24 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-01 06:14 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-08-02 10:45 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-02 06:59 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 00:34 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 13:57 +0200
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 06:19 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-02 15:28 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-02 13:34 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-03 07:32 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-03 11:51 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-04 08:21 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-08-04 13:18 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-04 14:02 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-04 12:26 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:24 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:36 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 12:14 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 12:17 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-08-06 13:35 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:20 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-02 13:43 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-28 09:19 -1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 05:15 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-28 21:50 -1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 08:24 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 10:08 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 15:06 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-30 06:22 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 01:07 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 01:30 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 10:17 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 00:51 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 05:20 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 13:06 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 08:13 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 09:09 -1000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 14:08 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 15:24 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 20:12 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 17:36 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 21:54 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 22:03 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 22:00 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:19 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 20:40 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-23 22:23 +1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:48 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 16:04 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 19:31 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 17:20 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 17:54 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 21:27 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 19:18 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 22:25 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 20:39 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 23:32 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 00:30 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 21:36 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 00:46 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-25 09:19 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:35 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:32 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 17:48 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 23:09 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:43 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-23 06:58 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-23 04:02 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 10:43 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-23 10:48 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 10:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 11:24 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-24 03:33 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 08:16 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-25 04:28 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-27 11:59 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 10:44 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 11:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 11:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-27 09:09 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 12:47 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 13:27 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs all2001@spambog.com (Wolfgang Allinger) - 2016-07-27 18:20 -0300
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 19:40 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 19:56 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 00:44 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-27 16:14 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 18:38 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 16:03 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 21:09 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 21:13 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-27 15:25 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 02:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-07-27 09:44 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 13:06 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 12:43 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-25 04:32 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Roelf Toxopeus <rt4all@nothishetnet.nl> - 2016-07-23 14:47 +0200
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 12:24 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 19:47 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 05:33 -0700

csiph-web