Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash

From	anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash
Date	2016-07-29 05:15 +0000
Organization	Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID	<2016Jul29.071534@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <04KdnWxKbtCzUgjKnZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@supernews.com> <nnabiq$4qh$1@gioia.aioe.org> <LY2dnf9BXvXOmQTKnZ2dnUU7-XHNnZ2d@supernews.com> <2016Jul28.111700@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <s9adnZ925JJTxwfKnZ2dnUU7-UfNnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> writes:
>On 7/27/16 11:17 PM, Anton Ertl wrote:
>> That's interesting, because I have been thinking about how to deal
>> with the problem that Forth systems compiling to flash have
>> difficulties with CREATE...DOES>, because DOES> overwrites a field
>> that ideally would lie in flash (and which we don't want to
>> overwrite).
>
>That's one of the many charms of using a cross-compiler. It constructs a 
>complete image in the host's RAM that is downloaded to the target flash 
>before opening an interactive link for testing. It offers all the 
>advantages of interactive development that Forthers love while managing 
>the trickiness of dealing with flash and other issues.

There is no trickiness of dealing with flash.  Write once, and
everything is fine.  We just need interfaces that fit this
restriction.  Most of Forth is fine, but DOES> and IMMEDIATE have a
model of first defining a word in one way, and later changing it to be
different, and that does not go well with the flash restriction.
Words are only used in their final form (except for proof-of-concept
examples such as the one below), so this property of the interface is
unnecessary, and an interface that does not have this property would
not take any capability away that is really being used.

As for the charms of using a cross-compiler, my experience is
different.  Cross-compiling sucks, big time.  Of course it is possible
to do better than the Gforth cross-compiler, but some limitations of
cross-compilers are fundamental, not implementation issues: In
particular, in Forth there is no hard line between compile-time and
run-time; programs can run words during what the programmer thinks of
as compilation (e.g., for initialization, or as macros), and compile
code during what the programmer thinks of as run-time.
Cross-compilers restrict that and demand that we draw a hard line, and
identify what is run on the host, and (if they allow it at all) what
is compiled in the target.

And if they compile to flash, they have the same problem with DOES> as
compilers running on the target, e.g., the following will not work
with headers in flash:

\ on the host
: recital ( -- )
  ." Your daddy is standing on the table. Ask him 'WHY?' "
does> drop ." To change the light bulb."
does> drop ." Because it's burned out."
does> drop ." Because it was old."
does> drop ." Because we put it in there a long time ago."
does> drop ." Because it was dark!"
does> drop ." Because it was night time!!"
does> drop ." Stop saying WHY?"
does> drop ." Because it's driving me crazy."
does> drop ." Just let me change this light bulb!"
;

create why?

\ on the target
recital
why?
why?
why?
why?
why?
why?
why?
why?
why?

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2016: http://www.euroforth.org/ef16/

Thread

Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:09 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:21 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-21 14:58 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 11:23 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 12:42 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-21 12:40 -1000
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:07 -0700
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-21 19:32 -0500
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:40 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:50 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-21 19:53 -0500
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:58 +0300
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:54 +0300
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 06:48 +0000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 00:19 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-22 02:33 -0500
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:45 +0300
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 19:41 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 20:52 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:22 -0400
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-22 10:49 -0500
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:16 -0400
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:11 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 06:32 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 23:58 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:02 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 17:06 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:11 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-21 15:57 -1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-22 13:25 +1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 20:24 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-07-22 11:32 +0000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 12:49 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 23:10 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:36 -0700
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 20:58 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 21:56 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 23:38 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:43 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:56 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 14:18 -0400
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 08:55 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-25 11:34 +0000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:36 -0400
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2016-07-22 11:15 +0200
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:37 -0400
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 08:56 -1000
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-24 13:16 +1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 12:58 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-25 18:09 +1000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 22:34 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-27 23:08 +1000
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-27 08:58 -1000
                CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-28 09:17 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-29 00:19 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-28 14:54 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 10:00 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-29 21:47 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2016-07-29 15:04 +0200
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-30 18:42 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 15:05 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 02:21 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-31 13:05 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 21:24 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-31 19:07 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-01 06:24 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-01 06:14 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-08-02 10:45 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-02 06:59 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 00:34 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 13:57 +0200
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 06:19 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-02 15:28 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-02 13:34 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-03 07:32 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-03 11:51 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-04 08:21 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-08-04 13:18 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-04 14:02 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-04 12:26 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:24 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:36 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 12:14 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 12:17 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-08-06 13:35 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:20 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-02 13:43 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-28 09:19 -1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 05:15 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-28 21:50 -1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 08:24 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 10:08 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 15:06 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-30 06:22 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 01:07 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 01:30 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 10:17 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 00:51 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 05:20 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 13:06 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 08:13 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 09:09 -1000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 14:08 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 15:24 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 20:12 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 17:36 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 21:54 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 22:03 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 22:00 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:19 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 20:40 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-23 22:23 +1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:48 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 16:04 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 19:31 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 17:20 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 17:54 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 21:27 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 19:18 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 22:25 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 20:39 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 23:32 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 00:30 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 21:36 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 00:46 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-25 09:19 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:35 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:32 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 17:48 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 23:09 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:43 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-23 06:58 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-23 04:02 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 10:43 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-23 10:48 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 10:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 11:24 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-24 03:33 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 08:16 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-25 04:28 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-27 11:59 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 10:44 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 11:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 11:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-27 09:09 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 12:47 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 13:27 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs all2001@spambog.com (Wolfgang Allinger) - 2016-07-27 18:20 -0300
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 19:40 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 19:56 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 00:44 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-27 16:14 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 18:38 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 16:03 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 21:09 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 21:13 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-27 15:25 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 02:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-07-27 09:44 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 13:06 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 12:43 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-25 04:32 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Roelf Toxopeus <rt4all@nothishetnet.nl> - 2016-07-23 14:47 +0200
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 12:24 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 19:47 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 05:33 -0700

csiph-web