Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #49333

Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs

From Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs
Date 2016-07-22 10:49 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nmtfat$899$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <weSdnZmlaO_A0gzKnZ2dnUU7-fvNnZ2d@supernews.com> <1310374b-be2c-4cd8-ae3e-b9f206c9fe60@googlegroups.com> <c4b571a1-70c9-405a-9c6e-b84560f4a91f@googlegroups.com> <9e811fc2-2463-45a9-b85c-10f57ebb277e@googlegroups.com> <nmtdnc$92d$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/22/2016 10:22 AM, rickman wrote:
> On 7/21/2016 11:52 PM, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 7:41:28 PM UTC-7, Brad Eckert wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 5:07:46 PM UTC-7, hughag...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What most likely happened is that some compiler-writers had code
>>>> and data separated, because they knew that this results in
>>>> significantly faster execution speed. SwiftForth had code and
>>>> data intermixed. Everybody wanted to be ANS-Forth compliant, so
>>>> Elizabeth Rather said either method was fine --- data may or may
>>>> not be intermixed with code --- nothing was standardized.
>>>
>>> AFAIK, Rick Van Norman was the primary author of SwiftForth, not
>>> Elizabeth.
>>
>> I'm well aware...
>
> of precious little for the most part.  Your rantings are getting the
> better of you here so I snipped the pointless maniacal ravings.  I will
> point out that computers come in many sizes, shapes and architectures.
> Not all of them require or even support the separation of data and code
> space.  The bottom line is Forth allows you to design a compiler that is
> appropriate for your computer system no matter what it is.  Well, maybe
> not on an abacus.
>
I do believe he was referring about desktop machines since his Forth 
project is only for desktops and that seems to be his area of interest, 
in that case the chips do have mechanisms to enforce the separation of 
the code and the data, although use of those features is optional. 
Windows has that feature although it can be turned off for compatibility 
with old software. Linus also has that capability also.

In the embedded field that forced separation is all over the place with 
many devices offering no protection and separation of data versus code. 
The assemblers for those embedded devices do provide with commands to 
separate the two as that feature is vital in creating code that can be 
placed in ROM or FLASH memories.

These two classes of computers have drifted apart over the years, it 
used to be that desktops used the same processors that embedded 
computers used, but that has changed although some ARM machines are 
beginning to blend the two classes again. Raspberry Pi 3 ,or their 
brethren anyone?

The only thing one can count on is that Forth is great, specially for 
embedded computer devices.

-- 
Cecil - k5nwa

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:09 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:21 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-21 14:58 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 11:23 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 12:42 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-21 12:40 -1000
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:07 -0700
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-21 19:32 -0500
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:40 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:50 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-21 19:53 -0500
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:58 +0300
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:54 +0300
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 06:48 +0000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 00:19 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-22 02:33 -0500
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:45 +0300
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 19:41 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 20:52 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:22 -0400
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-22 10:49 -0500
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:16 -0400
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:11 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 06:32 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 23:58 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:02 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 17:06 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:11 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-21 15:57 -1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-22 13:25 +1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 20:24 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-07-22 11:32 +0000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 12:49 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 23:10 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:36 -0700
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 20:58 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 21:56 -0700
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 23:38 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:43 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 10:56 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 14:18 -0400
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 08:55 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-25 11:34 +0000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:36 -0400
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2016-07-22 11:15 +0200
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 11:37 -0400
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 08:56 -1000
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-24 13:16 +1000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 12:58 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-25 18:09 +1000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 22:34 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-27 23:08 +1000
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-27 08:58 -1000
                CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-28 09:17 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-29 00:19 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-28 14:54 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 10:00 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-29 21:47 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2016-07-29 15:04 +0200
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-30 18:42 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 15:05 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 02:21 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-31 13:05 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 21:24 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-31 19:07 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-01 06:24 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-01 06:14 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-08-02 10:45 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-02 06:59 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 00:34 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 13:57 +0200
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 06:19 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-02 15:28 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-02 13:34 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-03 07:32 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-03 11:51 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-04 08:21 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-08-04 13:18 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-04 14:02 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-04 12:26 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:24 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:36 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 12:14 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 12:17 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-08-06 13:35 +1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash (was: Dictionary separated ...) Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:20 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-08-02 13:43 -0500
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-28 09:19 -1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 05:15 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-28 21:50 -1000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-29 08:24 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 10:08 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 15:06 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-30 06:22 +0000
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 01:07 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 01:30 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 10:17 -0700
                Re: CREATE...DOES> etc. and flash hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 00:51 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 05:20 -0700
    Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 13:06 +0000
      Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 08:13 -0700
        Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 09:09 -1000
          Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 14:08 -0700
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 15:24 -0700
              Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 20:12 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 17:36 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 21:54 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 22:03 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 22:00 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 22:19 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 20:40 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-23 22:23 +1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:48 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 16:04 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 19:31 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 17:20 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 17:54 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 21:27 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 19:18 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 22:25 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 20:39 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 23:32 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 00:30 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 21:36 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 00:46 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-25 09:19 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:35 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:32 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 17:48 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 23:09 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 12:43 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-23 06:58 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-23 04:02 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 10:43 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-23 10:48 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 10:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 11:24 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-24 03:33 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 08:16 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-25 04:28 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-27 11:59 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 10:44 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 11:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 11:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-27 09:09 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 12:47 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 13:27 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs all2001@spambog.com (Wolfgang Allinger) - 2016-07-27 18:20 -0300
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 19:40 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 19:56 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 00:44 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-27 16:14 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 18:38 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 16:03 -0400
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 21:09 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs missycurl@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 21:13 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-27 15:25 +0000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 02:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-07-27 09:44 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 13:06 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:36 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-24 12:43 -1000
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:53 -0700
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-07-25 04:32 -0500
                Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Roelf Toxopeus <rt4all@nothishetnet.nl> - 2016-07-23 14:47 +0200
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-07-22 12:24 -1000
            Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 19:47 -0700
  Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 05:33 -0700

csiph-web