Re: a small but significant win

From	000-666 <8-0-15@never.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.environment
Subject	Re: a small but significant win
Followup-To	alt.morons
Date	2026-10-14 21:50 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<11aoter$1olpu$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<11a4dnf$1tkk$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <11ajc2k$3tlpq$2@dont-email.me> <6vlqclhjdev4ui9k37eoq1g9g2ublqdhm2@4ax.com> <ac0uclhcel2bo7s5oj45es8t1gbiddm0ln@4ax.com>

Followups directed to: alt.morons

Show all headers | View raw

GOP smacked loon Jeremiah Jones shared hallucinations

> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> In Australia it is compulsory to vote,
>> Right now done by preferential system where you must vote in order of
>> preference 1 for party A, 2 for B, 3 for C and so on a minimum of 16
>> times to be counted, OR just put one in the box for your party choice
>> This has designed prefences decided by the party box you tick And this
>> is what happens
> 
> So 

So, what the fuck are you doing in Australian newsgroups where you don't 
belong seppo troll???

> you're forced to vote,

How horrible eh, being asked to do your civic duty, eh moron!

And just imagine those horrible consequences you face if you don't:
  You get a $20.00 fine. That's it!
  What absolutely unbearable horrible punishment!

You septics have zero concept of social responsibility! :-P

> and then all you can do is vote for a party,
> not a candidate?

Sure. You are absolutely ignorant about the Australian electoral system 
yet you have the audacity to make stupid comment on it.
Maybe Google it first before you make yourself look like the arrogantly 
ignorant septic fool you actually are.

In Australia you are given the choice to vote for parties in a 
preferential order or alternatively you can cast your vote for the 
candidates directly, also in a preferential order. You have the full 
freedom of choice unlike you fucking sheep septics who have to live in 
gerrymandered/voter suppressed/billionaires manipulated first past the 
post shit-hole of a country.

> Do you people have any say as to who the candidates
> are, or does the party decide all that for you?

Decision about the selection of party candidates remain with the 
membership of the given party. 
If you want to have a say about the nominations you have to sign up as a 
member.
Nothing wrong with that.

Anyhow, there are also independent candidates, and you have also no say in 
the decision of individuals nominating themselves for the office 
*providing they fulfil the criteria* for the nomination.

But, actually that is totally irrelevant from the standpoint of an average 
voter who have the power to reject or accept candidates at the ballot box 
and can do so in a preferential order.
That is why our electoral system is far superior to the shitshow your 
septics have.

And now kindly bugger off in the sunset, together with your trolling ilk.

-- 
...and was promptly flushed and fully sanitised.  :-P

Thread

a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-07 03:19 +0000
  Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-12 12:57 -0600
    Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:23 +1100
      Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:50 +1100
        Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 13:51 +1100
        Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:46 -0600
      Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:41 -0600
      Re: a small but significant win Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> - 2026-10-13 21:19 -0700
        Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:02 +1100
          Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:11 +1100
            Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:42 +1100
        Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:18 +1100
          Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 07:29 +0000
            Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:38 +1100
              Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 03:08 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 17:02 +0000
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:35 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:48 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:56 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:02 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:36 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:04 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:01 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:41 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-16 20:38 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:39 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 11:03 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:32 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:38 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:42 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:24 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:10 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:44 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 05:43 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 13:00 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:48 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-16 03:06 +0000
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:38 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:11 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:26 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:42 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:15 +1100
            Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-14 20:34 +1100
              Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 09:54 +0000
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:01 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 22:09 +1100
              Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:52 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 23:49 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 03:25 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:10 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:00 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:15 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:45 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:51 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:06 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:34 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 09:31 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 11:07 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:32 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:39 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:03 +1100
        Re: a small but significant win 000-666 <8-0-15@never.invalid> - 2026-10-14 21:50 +0000
          Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 11:01 -0600
            Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:30 +1100

csiph-web