Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.math > #641263

Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways

From olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.math, comp.theory, sci.logic
Subject Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways
Date 2025-11-26 19:42 -0600
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <10g8a9c$vrtg$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <20251126155440.395@kylheku.com> <10g85fk$u57s$1@dont-email.me> <20251126163259.71@kylheku.com> <10g87a7$upad$1@dont-email.me> <-k3t_AWjQHLMjeopJvJ2h2VN98Y@jntp>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/26/2025 7:24 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 27/11/2025 à 01:51, olcott a écrit :
>> On 11/26/2025 6:39 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>>> On 2025-11-27, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/26/2025 5:55 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-11-26, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/26/2025 4:19 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-11-26, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2025 3:47 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-11-26, dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2025 2:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2025 12:35 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-11-26, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words you are trying to get away with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or the semantics of the C programing language.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Says the pitiful twit who has no meaningful response to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> results shown
>>>>>>>>>>>> with code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am not the one that came up with the jackass idea
>>>>>>>>>>> of restarting a simulation after it has already
>>>>>>>>>>> conclusively proved that it cannot possibly halt.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That the continuation of the simulation reaches a final 
>>>>>>>>>> halting state
>>>>>>>>>> conclusively proves otherwise.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And Olcott has no idea how to fix it and is no longer
>>>>>>>>> able to engage with tasks involving code.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> void Infinite_Loop()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>       HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>>>>       return;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And the continuation of the simulation
>>>>>>>> at the "return" statement "proves"
>>>>>>>> by deception that infinite loops halt.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have no idea what you are blabbing about, and neither do you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We could simulate Infinite_Loop() until it
>>>>>> proves that it cannot possibly stop running
>>>>>> unless aborted, then abort it. Now to use
>>>>>> your method we can "resume" the simulation
>>>>>> at a different machine state.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you fucking idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>>> This simulation is "resumed" at the "return"
>>>>>> instruction.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you fucking idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> "In other words you are trying to get away with
>>>>> disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language
>>>>> or the semantics of the C programing language."
>>>>>
>>>>> See above.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I discussed you (not by name) with Claude AI.
>>>> It is convinced that you must be a liar.
>>>
>>> Right; anything but atually get to grips with some code.
>>>
>>>> I will fix this by actually adapting a C interpreter
>>>> to prove that you are a liar to anyone that knows C.
>>>>
>>>> I tried to do this with x86 yet this proved far
>>>> too difficult for even the chief editor of one
>>>> of the most prestigious computer science journals.
>>>
>>> It is child's play to show that your claims based on
>>> that x86 contraption are incorrect.
>>>
>>>> When you resume any simulation that cannot possibly
>>>> stop running to the exact same total machine state
>>>
>>> No, only the state of the simulation is resumed, not
>>> the total machine state.
>>>
>>
>> Great you finally admit that you are cheating.
>> Anyone knowing comp.theory will understand this
>> is cheating.
> 
> Quite the opposite.
> 
> Don't pretend to talk in the name of other people. SINNER !

Kaz is saying that he can "resume" a simulation
that has just proved that it will never stop
running to a different machine state to "prove"
that this simulation does stop running.

I am estimating that you are agreeing with
Kaz not even knowing that what he is claiming.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott

My 28 year goal has been to make
"true on the basis of meaning" computable.

This required establishing a new foundation
for correct reasoning.

Back to sci.math | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 09:00 -0600
  Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 07:31 -0600
  Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 07:31 -0600
    Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-11-26 12:01 +0200
      Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 09:17 -0600
        Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-26 10:29 -0500
        Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-26 18:35 +0000
          Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 13:55 -0600
            Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 14:58 -0500
              Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-26 21:47 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 15:53 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-26 22:19 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 16:48 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 18:00 -0500
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-26 23:55 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 18:20 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-27 00:39 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 18:51 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 20:02 -0500
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-11-27 01:24 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 19:42 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-11-27 02:00 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 20:37 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-27 04:15 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 22:31 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-27 06:51 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-27 08:59 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-27 10:16 -0500
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-27 18:17 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-27 07:41 -0500
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-27 07:40 -0500
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 23:00 -0800
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-11-27 01:39 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 19:47 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-11-27 01:59 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 20:26 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-27 04:19 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 22:39 -0600
        Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-11-27 09:49 +0200
          Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 23:58 -0800
            Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-11-28 10:14 +0200
              The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-28 08:46 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-28 10:59 -0500
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-11-29 11:27 +0200
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-29 10:38 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-29 14:58 -0500
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-12-01 12:45 +0200
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 06:47 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-01 14:29 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 08:38 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-01 14:45 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 08:57 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-01 15:06 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 09:19 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 09:26 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 09:29 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-01 15:31 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 09:39 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-01 15:48 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 09:55 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-01 16:00 +0000
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 10:27 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 16:41 -0800
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 18:24 -0600
                Olcott is provably correct --- no one can correctly refute this olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 19:54 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-12-02 11:07 +0200
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-02 08:14 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-12-03 13:34 +0200
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 10:27 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-12-04 11:17 +0200
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 08:15 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-12-06 11:23 +0200
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-06 06:47 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- updated Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-12-06 17:26 -0500
          Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- faking ignorance olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-27 09:21 -0600
            Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- faking ignorance Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-27 10:40 -0500
              Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- faking ignorance Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-27 18:37 +0000
            Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- faking ignorance Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-27 18:24 +0000
            Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- faking ignorance Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-11-28 10:18 +0200
              Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- faking ignorance olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-28 08:52 -0600
                Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways --- faking ignorance Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-28 11:01 -0500

csiph-web